%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV892-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.26s 0.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 33 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 51 ( 15 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 4 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 54 ( 10 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_CollectD_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X3),X2),c_Collect(X1,X3)))
| hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CollectD_0) ).
cnf(cls_CollectI_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X3,X2))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X1),X2),c_Collect(X3,X1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CollectI_0) ).
cnf(cls_Collect__def_0,axiom,
c_Collect(X1,X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Collect__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_Com_Opname),v_pn),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_domD_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X3),X2),c_Map_Odom(X1,X3,X4)))
| hAPP(X1,X2) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Map_Osko__Map__XdomD__1__1(X2,X1,X3,X4),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_domD_0) ).
cnf(cls_WT__bodiesD_0,axiom,
( ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X2,tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_OWT(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WT__bodiesD_0) ).
cnf(cls_the_Osimps_0,axiom,
c_Option_Othe(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_the_Osimps_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Com_OWT(c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X3),X2),c_Collect(X1,X3)))
| hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CollectD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X3,X2))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X1),X2),c_Collect(X3,X1))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CollectI_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X3),X2),c_Collect(X1,X3)))
| hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
c_Collect(X1,X2) = X1,
cls_Collect__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X3,X2))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X1),X2),c_Collect(X3,X1))) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X3),X2),X1))
| hBOOL(hAPP(X1,X2)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_Com_Opname),v_pn),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom))),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X3),X2),c_Map_Odom(X1,X3,X4)))
| hAPP(X1,X2) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Map_Osko__Map__XdomD__1__1(X2,X1,X3,X4),X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_domD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X3,X2))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X1),X2),X3)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),v_pn)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X3),X2),c_Map_Odom(X1,X3,X4)))
| hAPP(X1,X2) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Map_Osko__Map__XdomD__1__1(X2,X1,X3,X4),X4) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X1),v_pn),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X2,tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_OWT(X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WT__bodiesD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
c_Option_Othe(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
cls_the_Osimps_0 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Map_Osko__Map__XdomD__1__1(v_pn,c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom) = hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X2,tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_OWT(X2) ),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
c_Map_Osko__Map__XdomD__1__1(v_pn,c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom) = c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Com_OWT(c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_OWT(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom) = hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Com_OWT(c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom)),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_31]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV892-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:31:09 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/0.76 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.26/0.76 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.26/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with pid 677115 completed with status 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Result found by G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1
% 1.26/0.76 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.26/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.26/0.76 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.26/0.76 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.26/0.76 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 151s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 677124 completed with status 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 1.26/0.76 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.26/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 1.26/0.76 % No SInE strategy applied
% 1.26/0.76 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.26/0.76 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 151s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 1.26/0.76 % Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 1.26/0.76 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.26/0.76
% 1.26/0.76 % Proof found!
% 1.26/0.76 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.26/0.76 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/0.76 % Parsed axioms : 704
% 1.26/0.76 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Initial clauses : 704
% 1.26/0.76 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 1.26/0.76 % Initial clauses in saturation : 700
% 1.26/0.76 % Processed clauses : 1281
% 1.26/0.76 % ...of these trivial : 25
% 1.26/0.76 % ...subsumed : 131
% 1.26/0.76 % ...remaining for further processing : 1125
% 1.26/0.76 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 66
% 1.26/0.76 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 1.26/0.76 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 1.26/0.76 % Generated clauses : 9448
% 1.26/0.76 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7984
% 1.26/0.76 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 1.26/0.76 % Paramodulations : 9346
% 1.26/0.76 % Factorizations : 6
% 1.26/0.76 % NegExts : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Equation resolutions : 96
% 1.26/0.76 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Total rewrite steps : 3354
% 1.26/0.76 % ...of those cached : 2486
% 1.26/0.76 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.26/0.76 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.26/0.76 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.26/0.76 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.26/0.76 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.26/0.76 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.26/0.76 % Current number of processed clauses : 565
% 1.26/0.76 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 113
% 1.26/0.76 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 1.26/0.76 % Negative unit clauses : 32
% 1.26/0.76 % Non-unit-clauses : 411
% 1.26/0.76 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7950
% 1.26/0.76 % ...number of literals in the above : 19465
% 1.26/0.76 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Current number of archived clauses : 561
% 1.26/0.76 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 63346
% 1.26/0.76 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45019
% 1.26/0.76 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 92
% 1.26/0.76 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2171
% 1.26/0.76 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % BW rewrite match attempts : 383
% 1.26/0.76 % BW rewrite match successes : 69
% 1.26/0.76 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.26/0.76 % Termbank termtop insertions : 200200
% 1.26/0.76 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1353
% 1.26/0.76
% 1.26/0.76 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.26/0.76 % User time : 0.250 s
% 1.26/0.76 % System time : 0.015 s
% 1.26/0.76 % Total time : 0.264 s
% 1.26/0.76 % Maximum resident set size: 4900 pages
% 1.26/0.76
% 1.26/0.76 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.26/0.76 % User time : 0.892 s
% 1.26/0.76 % System time : 0.054 s
% 1.26/0.76 % Total time : 0.946 s
% 1.26/0.76 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 1.26/0.76 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------