%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV892-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:07:05 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.35s 0.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.35s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 28 ( 11 unt; 4 nHn; 22 RR)
% Number of literals : 49 ( 20 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 4 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 35 ( 5 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_WT__bodiesD_0,axiom,
( ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X2,tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_OWT(X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WT__bodiesD_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(cls_WTs__elim__cases_I7_J_0,axiom,
( ~ c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Com_Osko__Com__XWTs__elim__cases__7__1(X1),tc_Com_Ocom) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTs__elim__cases_I7_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_the_Osimps_0,axiom,
c_Option_Othe(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_the_Osimps_0) ).
cnf(cls_WT_OBody_0,axiom,
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WT_OBody_0) ).
cnf(cls_domIff_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X4),X2),c_Map_Odom(X1,X4,X3)))
| hAPP(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_domIff_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Com_OWT(c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_Com_Opname),v_pn),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X2,tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_OWT(X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WT__bodiesD_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X2,tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_OWT(X2) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Com_Osko__Com__XWTs__elim__cases__7__1(X1),tc_Com_Ocom) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTs__elim__cases_I7_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_OWT(X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Com_Osko__Com__XWTs__elim__cases__7__1(X1),tc_Com_Ocom) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
c_Option_Othe(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
cls_the_Osimps_0 ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X2) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1)
| c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Osko__Com__XWTs__elim__cases__7__1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))
| c_Com_Osko__Com__XWTs__elim__cases__7__1(X1) = c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1),tc_Com_Ocom) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1)) ),
cls_WT_OBody_0 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X4),X2),c_Map_Odom(X1,X4,X3)))
| hAPP(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_domIff_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Com_OWT(c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1))
| c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Osko__Com__XWTs__elim__cases__7__1(X1)) ),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
| c_Com_Osko__Com__XWTs__elim__cases__7__1(X1) = c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1),tc_Com_Ocom) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(X4),X2),c_Map_Odom(X1,X4,X3)))
| hAPP(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3) ),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_in(tc_Com_Opname),v_pn),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom))),
cls_conjecture_3 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Com_OWT(c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),tc_Com_Ocom)),
c_0_19 ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( c_Com_OWT(c_Option_Othe(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1),tc_Com_Ocom))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV892-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:32:00 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/0.73 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.35/0.73 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with pid 3961626 completed with status 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Result found by G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1
% 0.35/0.73 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.35/0.73 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.35/0.73 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.35/0.73 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 3961636 completed with status 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Result found by G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.35/0.73 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.35/0.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.35/0.73 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.35/0.73 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.35/0.73 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.35/0.73 % Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.35/0.73 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.35/0.73
% 0.35/0.73 % Proof found!
% 0.35/0.73 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.35/0.73 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.35/0.73 % Parsed axioms : 704
% 0.35/0.73 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Initial clauses : 704
% 0.35/0.73 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 4
% 0.35/0.73 % Initial clauses in saturation : 700
% 0.35/0.73 % Processed clauses : 914
% 0.35/0.73 % ...of these trivial : 26
% 0.35/0.73 % ...subsumed : 132
% 0.35/0.73 % ...remaining for further processing : 756
% 0.35/0.73 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.35/0.73 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.35/0.73 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.35/0.73 % Generated clauses : 165
% 0.35/0.73 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 89
% 0.35/0.73 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.35/0.73 % Paramodulations : 159
% 0.35/0.73 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.35/0.73 % NegExts : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Equation resolutions : 4
% 0.35/0.73 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Total rewrite steps : 355
% 0.35/0.73 % ...of those cached : 231
% 0.35/0.73 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.73 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.73 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.73 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.73 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.73 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.35/0.73 % Current number of processed clauses : 199
% 0.35/0.73 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 88
% 0.35/0.73 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.35/0.73 % Negative unit clauses : 32
% 0.35/0.73 % Non-unit-clauses : 77
% 0.35/0.73 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 426
% 0.35/0.73 % ...number of literals in the above : 1015
% 0.35/0.73 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Current number of archived clauses : 558
% 0.35/0.73 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 32620
% 0.35/0.73 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23751
% 0.35/0.73 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 95
% 0.35/0.73 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1096
% 0.35/0.73 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % BW rewrite match attempts : 335
% 0.35/0.73 % BW rewrite match successes : 39
% 0.35/0.73 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.35/0.73 % Termbank termtop insertions : 34398
% 0.35/0.73 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1353
% 0.35/0.73
% 0.35/0.73 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/0.73 % User time : 0.149 s
% 0.35/0.73 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.35/0.73 % Total time : 0.164 s
% 0.35/0.73 % Maximum resident set size: 4952 pages
% 0.35/0.73
% 0.35/0.73 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.35/0.73 % User time : 0.664 s
% 0.35/0.73 % System time : 0.053 s
% 0.35/0.73 % Total time : 0.717 s
% 0.35/0.73 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.35/0.73 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------