%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV897-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 5.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 9 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_evalc_OBody_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1))),X2),X3))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)),X2),X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_evalc_OBody_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn)),v_x),v_xa)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn))),v_x),v_xa)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1))),X2),X3))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)),X2),X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_evalc_OBody_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn)),v_x),v_xa)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1))),X2),X3))
| hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)),X2),X3)) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn))),v_x),v_xa)),
cls_conjecture_1 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn)),v_x),v_xa)),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV897-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.43 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/5.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/5.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/5.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/5.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/5.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/5.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/5.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:30:41 UTC 2026
% 0.15/5.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/5.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/5.56 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.21/5.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2816410 completed with status 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.21/5.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/5.56 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/5.56 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/5.56 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2816424 completed with status 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.21/5.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/5.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.21/5.56 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/5.56 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.21/5.56 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/5.56 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.21/5.56 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/5.56
% 0.21/5.56 % Proof found!
% 0.21/5.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/5.56 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/5.56 % Parsed axioms : 493
% 0.21/5.56 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Initial clauses : 493
% 0.21/5.56 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.21/5.56 % Initial clauses in saturation : 491
% 0.21/5.56 % Processed clauses : 629
% 0.21/5.56 % ...of these trivial : 15
% 0.21/5.56 % ...subsumed : 88
% 0.21/5.56 % ...remaining for further processing : 526
% 0.21/5.56 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.21/5.56 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.21/5.56 % Backward-rewritten : 6
% 0.21/5.56 % Generated clauses : 48
% 0.21/5.56 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 25
% 0.21/5.56 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Paramodulations : 33
% 0.21/5.56 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % NegExts : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Equation resolutions : 15
% 0.21/5.56 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Total rewrite steps : 35
% 0.21/5.56 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.21/5.56 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.56 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.56 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.56 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.56 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.56 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/5.56 % Current number of processed clauses : 134
% 0.21/5.56 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 48
% 0.21/5.56 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Negative unit clauses : 36
% 0.21/5.56 % Non-unit-clauses : 50
% 0.21/5.56 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 270
% 0.21/5.56 % ...number of literals in the above : 564
% 0.21/5.56 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Current number of archived clauses : 392
% 0.21/5.56 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 17534
% 0.21/5.56 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12207
% 0.21/5.56 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 43
% 0.21/5.56 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1815
% 0.21/5.56 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 8
% 0.21/5.56 % BW rewrite match attempts : 161
% 0.21/5.56 % BW rewrite match successes : 32
% 0.21/5.56 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/5.56 % Termbank termtop insertions : 19607
% 0.21/5.56 % Search garbage collected termcells : 880
% 0.21/5.56
% 0.21/5.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/5.56 % User time : 0.033 s
% 0.21/5.56 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/5.56 % Total time : 0.042 s
% 0.21/5.56 % Maximum resident set size: 4528 pages
% 0.21/5.56
% 0.21/5.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/5.56 % User time : 0.146 s
% 0.21/5.56 % System time : 0.036 s
% 0.21/5.56 % Total time : 0.182 s
% 0.21/5.56 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.21/5.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------