↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWV897-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:36:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.39s 1.57s
% Output   : Refutation 1.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    1
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    4 (   3 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    5 (   0 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_evalc_OBody_0,axiom,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X)),Y),Z))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X))),Y),Z)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_evalc_OBody_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn))),v_x),v_xa)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Natural_Oevalc,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn)),v_x),v_xa)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_2) ).

cnf(3158,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_evalc_OBody_0,cls_conjecture_2,cls_conjecture_1]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWV897-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 12:07:29 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T12:07:29
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n013.cluster.edu at 2022-06-15T12:07:29
% 0.20/0.60  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.60     |class_OrderedGroup_Opordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.20/0.60  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.60     |class_OrderedGroup_Ogroup__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.20/0.60  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.60     |class_Int_Onumber__ring| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.20/0.60  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.60     |class_Ring__and__Field_Oidom| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.20/0.60  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.60     |class_OrderedGroup_Oab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 0.20/0.60  WARNING:
% 0.20/0.60     |class_OrderedGroup_Olordered__ab__group__add| is a 1-ary relation that occurs only negatively; disabling rows that contain it.
% 1.39/1.57  
% 1.39/1.57  
% 1.39/1.57  #||
% 1.39/1.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.39/1.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.39/1.57  ||#
% 1.39/1.57  
% 1.39/1.57  ; Summary of computation:
% 1.39/1.57  ;      6474 formulas have been input or derived (from 328 formulas).
% 1.39/1.57  ;      3158 (49%) were retained.  Of these,
% 1.39/1.57  ;           74 ( 2%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 1.39/1.57  ;         3084 (98%) are still being kept.
% 1.39/1.57  ; 
% 1.39/1.57  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.104  10%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.009   1%   Assert                       (493 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.337  31%   Process new row              (5,823 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.075   7%   Resolution                   (654 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.045   4%   Paramodulation               (327 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (4 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.026   2%   Condensing                   (1,236 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.055   5%   Forward subsumption          (1,236 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.021   2%   Backward subsumption         (959 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.005   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (1,862 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.171  16%   Forward simplification       (5,793 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.042   4%   Backward simplification      (3,148 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.145  13%   Ordering                     (17,555 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.002   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     0.048   4%   Other
% 1.39/1.57  ;     1.085        Total
% 1.39/1.57  ;     1.086        Real time
% 1.39/1.57  ; 
% 1.39/1.57  ; Term-hash-array has 8,997 terms in all.
% 1.39/1.57  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 946 entries (946 at peak, 959 added, 13 deleted).
% 1.39/1.57  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 6,172 nodes (6,172 at peak, 6,344 added, 172 deleted).
% 1.39/1.57  ;  Retrieved 2,517 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,236 calls.
% 1.39/1.57  ;  Retrieved 413 possibly backward subsumed rows in 959 calls.
% 1.39/1.57  ; Path-index has 8,849 entries (8,849 at peak, 9,069 added, 220 deleted).
% 1.39/1.57  ; Path-index has 24,302 nodes (24,302 at peak, 24,663 added, 361 deleted).
% 1.39/1.57  ; Trie-index has 8,849 entries (8,849 at peak, 9,069 added, 220 deleted).
% 1.39/1.57  ; Trie-index has 45,378 nodes (45,378 at peak, 47,065 added, 1,687 deleted).
% 1.39/1.57  ; Retrieved 19,588 generalization terms in 24,085 calls.
% 1.39/1.57  ; Retrieved 4,726 instance terms in 2,524 calls.
% 1.39/1.57  ; Retrieved 116,853 unifiable terms in 3,991 calls.
% 1.39/1.57  ; 
% 1.39/1.57  ; The agenda of rows to process has 21 entries:
% 1.39/1.57  ;     1 with value 16              4 with value 38               6 with value 43
% 1.39/1.57  ;     1 with value 20              3 with value 39               3 with value 44
% 1.39/1.57  ;     1 with value 37              1 with value 40               1 with value 45
% 1.39/1.57  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 43 entries:
% 1.39/1.57  ;     1 with value 34              1 with value 43               1 with value 57
% 1.39/1.57  ;     6 with value 35              1 with value 44               1 with value 70
% 1.39/1.57  ;     2 with value 36              1 with value 47               1 with value 77
% 1.39/1.57  ;     1 with value 37              2 with value 48               1 with value 80
% 1.39/1.57  ;     3 with value 38              3 with value 50               1 with value 112
% 1.39/1.57  ;     3 with value 39              1 with value 51               1 with value 161
% 1.39/1.57  ;     6 with value 40              1 with value 52               2 with value 178
% 1.39/1.57  ;     3 with value 41
% 1.39/1.57  ; The agenda of rows to give has 2717 entries:
% 1.39/1.57  ;     4 with value (4 6)         112 with value (4 28)           9 with value (4 50)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    18 with value (4 7)          74 with value (4 29)           2 with value (4 51)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     5 with value (4 8)          72 with value (4 30)           8 with value (4 52)
% 1.39/1.57  ;     4 with value (4 9)          31 with value (4 31)           6 with value (4 53)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    19 with value (4 10)         58 with value (4 32)          15 with value (4 54)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    20 with value (4 11)         69 with value (4 33)           4 with value (4 55)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    31 with value (4 12)         56 with value (4 34)          10 with value (4 56)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    76 with value (4 13)         51 with value (4 35)           8 with value (4 57)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    80 with value (4 14)         30 with value (4 36)           4 with value (4 58)
% 1.39/1.57  ;   129 with value (4 15)         37 with value (4 37)           3 with value (4 59)
% 1.39/1.57  ;   182 with value (4 16)         66 with value (4 38)           2 with value (4 60)
% 1.39/1.57  ;   143 with value (4 17)         43 with value (4 39)           2 with value (4 61)
% 1.39/1.57  ;   216 with value (4 18)         37 with value (4 40)           1 with value (4 62)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    78 with value (4 19)         25 with value (4 41)           2 with value (4 63)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    89 with value (4 20)         20 with value (4 42)           3 with value (4 64)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    87 with value (4 21)         41 with value (4 43)           1 with value (4 65)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    44 with value (4 22)         50 with value (4 44)           1 with value (4 67)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    60 with value (4 23)         32 with value (4 45)           3 with value (4 70)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    70 with value (4 24)         34 with value (4 46)           1 with value (4 76)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    84 with value (4 25)         13 with value (4 47)           1 with value (4 78)
% 1.39/1.57  ;   150 with value (4 26)         13 with value (4 48)           1 with value (4 82)
% 1.39/1.57  ;    71 with value (4 27)          5 with value (4 49)           1 with value (4 93)
% 1.39/1.57  Evaluation took:
% 1.39/1.57    1.087 seconds of real time
% 1.39/1.57    1.012336 seconds of user run time
% 1.39/1.57    0.075174 seconds of system run time
% 1.39/1.57    [Run times include 0.118 seconds GC run time.]
% 1.39/1.57    0 calls to %EVAL
% 1.39/1.57    0 page faults and
% 1.39/1.57    80,179,416 bytes consed.
% 1.39/1.57  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.39/1.57  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-15T12:07:30
% 1.39/1.57  :PROOF-FOUND
% 1.39/1.57  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------