%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV900-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 4 RR)
% Number of literals : 6 ( 0 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 7 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 2 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Com_Ostate),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).
cnf(cls_empty_0,axiom,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X2),tc_bool)),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_empty_0) ).
cnf(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Com_Ostate),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Com_Ostate),
c_0_2 ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X2),tc_bool)),X2),
cls_empty_0 ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV900-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:30:54 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with pid 2817054 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Result found by G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1
% 0.18/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/0.48 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.48 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 2817063 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.18/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.18/0.48 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.48 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.48 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.48 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.18/0.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 580
% 0.18/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Initial clauses : 580
% 0.18/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.18/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 579
% 0.18/0.48 % Processed clauses : 57
% 0.18/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.18/0.48 % ...subsumed : 8
% 0.18/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 48
% 0.18/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.18/0.48 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.18/0.48 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.18/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 47
% 0.18/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 32
% 0.18/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.18/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 8
% 0.18/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 522
% 0.18/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 1142
% 0.18/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 2
% 0.18/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 0.18/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8
% 0.18/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.18/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.18/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.18/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.18/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 19368
% 0.18/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 965
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 % User time : 0.017 s
% 0.18/0.48 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.18/0.48 % Total time : 0.024 s
% 0.18/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4616 pages
% 0.18/0.48
% 0.18/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.48 % User time : 0.051 s
% 0.18/0.48 % System time : 0.023 s
% 0.18/0.48 % Total time : 0.073 s
% 0.18/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.18/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------