%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV903-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 45 ( 28 unt; 3 nHn; 21 RR)
% Number of literals : 65 ( 21 equ; 27 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 21 ( 21 usr; 9 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 110 ( 22 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pna)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_7) ).
cnf(cls_CollectI_0,axiom,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
| c_in(X1,c_Collect(X2,X3),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CollectI_0) ).
cnf(cls_image__image_0,axiom,
c_Set_Oimage(X1,c_Set_Oimage(X2,X3,X4,X5),X5,X6) = c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X5,X6,X4),X3,X4,X6),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_image__image_0) ).
cnf(cls_insert__subset_2,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
| c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__subset_2) ).
cnf(cls_Collect__def_0,axiom,
c_Collect(X1,X2) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Collect__def_0) ).
cnf(cls_empty__subsetI_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2,tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_empty__subsetI_0) ).
cnf(cls_rev__image__eqI_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(hAPP(X4,X1),c_Set_Oimage(X4,X2,X3,X5),X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_rev__image__eqI_0) ).
cnf(cls_insert__code_1,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__code_1) ).
cnf(cls_insert__absorb_0,axiom,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__absorb_0) ).
cnf(cls_domIff_1,axiom,
( hAPP(X2,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X4)
| c_in(X1,c_Map_Odom(X2,X3,X4),X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_domIff_1) ).
cnf(cls_Option_Oset_Osimps_I2_J_0,axiom,
c_Option_Oset(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_Option_Oset_Osimps_I2_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_6,negated_conjecture,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pna) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_ya,tc_Com_Ocom),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_6) ).
cnf(cls_insert__not__empty_0,axiom,
c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) != c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__not__empty_0) ).
cnf(cls_set__empty__eq_1,axiom,
c_Option_Oset(c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X1),X1) = c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_set__empty__eq_1) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pna)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
| c_in(X1,c_Collect(X2,X3),X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_CollectI_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pna)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
c_Set_Oimage(X1,c_Set_Oimage(X2,X3,X4,X5),X5,X6) = c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X5,X6,X4),X3,X4,X6),
cls_image__image_0 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
| c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_insert__subset_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
| c_in(X1,c_Collect(X2,X3),X3) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
c_Collect(X1,X2) = X1,
cls_Collect__def_0 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pna)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Set_Oimage(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Set_Oimage(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X4,X3)
| ~ c_lessequals(X2,X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool))
| c_lessequals(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4,tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)) ),
c_0_18 ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
c_lessequals(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),X2,tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),
cls_empty__subsetI_0 ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(hAPP(X4,X1),c_Set_Oimage(X4,X2,X3,X5),X5) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_rev__image__eqI_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
| c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
cls_insert__code_1 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) = X2 ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_insert__absorb_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pna)),c_Set_Oimage(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Set_Oimage(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_in(hAPP(X4,X1),c_Set_Oimage(X4,X2,X3,X5),X5) ),
c_0_24 ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
c_in(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X3)
| c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) = X2 ),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pna),c_Set_Oimage(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ c_in(X1,X2,X4)
| c_in(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,axiom,
( hAPP(X2,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X4)
| c_in(X1,c_Map_Odom(X2,X3,X4),X3) ),
cls_domIff_1 ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ c_in(v_pna,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( c_in(X2,c_Map_Odom(X1,X4,X3),X5)
| hAPP(X1,X2) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
c_Option_Oset(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),X2),
cls_Option_Oset_Osimps_I2_J_0 ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pna) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_ya,tc_Com_Ocom),
cls_conjecture_6 ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) != c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_insert__not__empty_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_40,axiom,
c_Option_Oset(c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X1),X1) = c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_bool)),
cls_set__empty__eq_1 ).
cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) = hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pna),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
c_Option_Oset(hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pna),tc_Com_Ocom) = c_Set_Oinsert(v_ya,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Com_Ocom,tc_bool)),tc_Com_Ocom),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) != c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X3,tc_bool)),
c_0_39 ).
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_43]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV903-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.57 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.57 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.57 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.57 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.57 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.58 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.58 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.58 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:34:36 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.58 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.58 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.62 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.86 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.86 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with pid 1146038 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Result found by G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1
% 0.15/0.86 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.86 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.86 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.86 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting U----_206c_05_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 1146048 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Result found by G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 0.15/0.86 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.86 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.86 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.86 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.86 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.86 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.86
% 0.15/0.86 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.86 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.86 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.86 % Parsed axioms : 726
% 0.15/0.86 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Initial clauses : 726
% 0.15/0.86 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 3
% 0.15/0.86 % Initial clauses in saturation : 723
% 0.15/0.86 % Processed clauses : 2841
% 0.15/0.86 % ...of these trivial : 267
% 0.15/0.86 % ...subsumed : 976
% 0.15/0.86 % ...remaining for further processing : 1598
% 0.15/0.86 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 126
% 0.15/0.86 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Backward-subsumed : 25
% 0.15/0.86 % Backward-rewritten : 74
% 0.15/0.86 % Generated clauses : 11417
% 0.15/0.86 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8078
% 0.15/0.86 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 5
% 0.15/0.86 % Paramodulations : 11278
% 0.15/0.86 % Factorizations : 4
% 0.15/0.86 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Equation resolutions : 135
% 0.15/0.86 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Total rewrite steps : 5728
% 0.15/0.86 % ...of those cached : 3560
% 0.15/0.86 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.86 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.86 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.86 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.86 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.86 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.86 % Current number of processed clauses : 894
% 0.15/0.86 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 428
% 0.15/0.86 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 17
% 0.15/0.86 % Negative unit clauses : 33
% 0.15/0.86 % Non-unit-clauses : 416
% 0.15/0.86 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6315
% 0.15/0.86 % ...number of literals in the above : 10630
% 0.15/0.86 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Current number of archived clauses : 705
% 0.15/0.86 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 66661
% 0.15/0.86 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45276
% 0.15/0.86 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 655
% 0.15/0.86 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 825
% 0.15/0.86 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2050
% 0.15/0.86 % BW rewrite match successes : 287
% 0.15/0.86 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.86 % Termbank termtop insertions : 192839
% 0.15/0.86 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1355
% 0.15/0.86
% 0.15/0.86 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.86 % User time : 0.184 s
% 0.15/0.86 % System time : 0.014 s
% 0.15/0.86 % Total time : 0.199 s
% 0.15/0.86 % Maximum resident set size: 4896 pages
% 0.15/0.86
% 0.15/0.86 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.86 % User time : 0.899 s
% 0.15/0.86 % System time : 0.058 s
% 0.15/0.86 % Total time : 0.957 s
% 0.15/0.86 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.15/0.86 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------