↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV905-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.31s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.31s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   36 (  20 unt;   2 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   58 (  12 equ;  28 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (  15 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_insert__absorb_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
    | c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__absorb_0) ).

cnf(cls_mem__def_1,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_mem__def_1) ).

cnf(cls_insert__code_1,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__code_1) ).

cnf(cls_MGF_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
    | ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
    | ~ c_Com_OWT(X1)
    | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X1),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_MGF_0) ).

cnf(cls_insert__iff_1,axiom,
    hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_insert__iff_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_3,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_x,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_Com_OWT__bodies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_domIff_0,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_Map_Odom(X1,X4,X3),X4))
    | hAPP(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_domIff_0) ).

cnf(cls_WT_OBody_0,axiom,
    ( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
    | c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WT_OBody_0) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
    | c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_insert__absorb_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_mem__def_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3))
    | c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) = X2 ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | hBOOL(c_in(X1,X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X2,X1))
    | c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3) = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X1)),
    cls_insert__code_1 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
    | ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
    | ~ c_Com_OWT(X1)
    | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X1),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_MGF_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X3)),
    cls_insert__iff_1 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    c_Set_Oinsert(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4) = c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_x,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname)),
    cls_conjecture_3 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
    | ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
    | ~ c_Com_OWT(X1)
    | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X1),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    c_Com_OWT__bodies,
    cls_conjecture_1 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
    cls_conjecture_0 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_Map_Odom(X1,X4,X3),X4))
    | hAPP(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_domIff_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Set_Oinsert(X1,X2,X3),X4)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    c_Set_Oinsert(v_x,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname) = c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ c_Com_OWT(X1)
    | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X1),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X2,c_Map_Odom(X1,X4,X3),X4))
    | hAPP(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X3) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_x,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,axiom,
    ( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
    | c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X1)) ),
    cls_WT_OBody_0 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_x),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SWV905-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:29:06 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.31/0.51  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.31/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % new_bool_1 with pid 748866 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.31/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.31/0.51  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.31/0.51  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.51  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % SubtermCWHack with pid 748868 completed with status 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.31/0.51  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.31/0.51  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting G-N--_023_B07_F1_SP_PI_Q7_CS_SP_CO_S5PRR_S0Y1 with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.31/0.51  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.31/0.51  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.31/0.51  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.31/0.51  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.31/0.51  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.31/0.51  
% 0.31/0.51  % Proof found!
% 0.31/0.51  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.31/0.51  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.31/0.51  % Parsed axioms                        : 486
% 0.31/0.51  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 167
% 0.31/0.51  % Initial clauses                      : 319
% 0.31/0.51  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 319
% 0.31/0.51  % Processed clauses                    : 1376
% 0.31/0.51  % ...of these trivial                  : 223
% 0.31/0.51  % ...subsumed                          : 693
% 0.31/0.51  % ...remaining for further processing  : 460
% 0.31/0.51  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 150
% 0.31/0.51  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.31/0.51  % Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 0.31/0.51  % Generated clauses                    : 8734
% 0.31/0.51  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5175
% 0.31/0.51  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Paramodulations                      : 8574
% 0.31/0.51  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Equation resolutions                 : 160
% 0.31/0.51  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Total rewrite steps                  : 6327
% 0.31/0.51  % ...of those cached                   : 5610
% 0.31/0.51  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.31/0.51  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.31/0.51  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.31/0.51  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.31/0.51  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.31/0.51  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.31/0.51  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.31/0.51  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.31/0.51  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.31/0.51  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.31/0.51  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.31/0.51  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.31/0.51  % Current number of processed clauses  : 447
% 0.31/0.51  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 187
% 0.31/0.51  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
% 0.31/0.51  %    Negative unit clauses             : 10
% 0.31/0.51  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 242
% 0.31/0.51  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4112
% 0.31/0.51  % ...number of literals in the above   : 7975
% 0.31/0.51  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.31/0.51  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12402
% 0.31/0.51  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12196
% 0.31/0.51  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 649
% 0.31/0.51  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 99
% 0.31/0.51  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 1626
% 0.31/0.51  % BW rewrite match successes           : 71
% 0.31/0.51  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.31/0.51  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 116380
% 0.31/0.51  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1308
% 0.31/0.51  
% 0.31/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.51  % User time                : 0.065 s
% 0.31/0.51  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.31/0.51  % Total time               : 0.072 s
% 0.31/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4276 pages
% 0.31/0.51  
% 0.31/0.51  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.51  % User time                : 0.078 s
% 0.31/0.51  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.31/0.51  % Total time               : 0.090 s
% 0.31/0.51  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.31/0.51  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------