↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWV905-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:24:26 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.48s 0.98s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   35 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   32 (  17   ~;  15   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f442,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Map_Odom(X0,X3,X2),X3))
      | hAPP(X0,X1) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_domIff_0) ).

fof(f460,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X0) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
      | c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X0)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WT_OBody_0) ).

fof(f477,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
      | ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
      | ~ c_Com_OWT(X0)
      | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X0),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_MGF_0) ).

fof(f512,negated_conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

fof(f513,negated_conjecture,
    c_Com_OWT__bodies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

fof(f515,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_x,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_3) ).

fof(f516,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

tcf(c_894,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(X1,c_Map_Odom(X0,X3,X2),X3))
      | ( hAPP(X0,X1) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f442]) ).

tcf(c_909,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(X0))
      | ( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X0) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f460]) ).

tcf(c_926,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X0),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate)
      | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
      | ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
      | ~ c_Com_OWT(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f477]) ).

tcf(c_956,negated_conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f512]) ).

tcf(c_957,negated_conjecture,
    c_Com_OWT__bodies,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f513]) ).

tcf(c_959,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(c_in(v_x,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f515]) ).

tcf(c_960,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f516]) ).

tcf(c_1326,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X0),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate)
      | ~ c_Com_OWT(X0) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_926,c_957,c_956,c_926]) ).

tcf(c_3649,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(X0),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate)
      | ~ c_Com_OWT(X0) ),
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_1326]) ).

tcf(c_6480,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(c_in(v_x,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname))
    | ( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_x) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_894]) ).

tcf(c_6798,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),c_Set_Oinsert(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)),tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate)
    | ~ c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_3649]) ).

tcf(c_8746,plain,
    ( c_Com_OWT(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY(v_x))
    | ( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_x) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) ) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_909]) ).

tcf(c_8747,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_8746,c_6798,c_6480,c_960,c_959]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SWV905-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.31  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.31  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.31  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 21:16:05 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.31  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.07/0.33  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34  
% 0.07/0.34  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.07/0.34  
% 0.07/0.34  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.07/0.34  % Proving...
% 3.48/0.98  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.48/0.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.48/0.98  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.48/0.98  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  scvd_s sp: 6 0s scvd_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ Preprocessing...
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ Proving...
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % 
% 3.48/0.98  % clauses                               420
% 3.48/0.98  % conjectures                           3
% 3.48/0.98  % EPR                                   34
% 3.48/0.98  % Horn                                  367
% 3.48/0.98  % unary                                 126
% 3.48/0.98  % binary                                199
% 3.48/0.98  % lits                                  826
% 3.48/0.98  % lits eq                               261
% 3.48/0.98  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.48/0.98  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.48/0.98  % fd_cond                               4
% 3.48/0.98  % fd_pseudo_cond                        33
% 3.48/0.98  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ 
% 3.48/0.98  % Current options:
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ 
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % 
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % ------ Proving...
% 3.48/0.98  % 
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.48/0.98  
% 3.48/0.98  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------