↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWV908-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:36:25 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.45s 3.65s
% Output   : Refutation 3.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   13 (   1 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   4 usr;   3 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   7 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   1 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_equalityE_0,axiom,
    c_lessequals(X,X,tc_fun(Y,tc_bool)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_equalityE_0) ).

cnf(cls_MGF__lemma2__simult_0,axiom,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),X,tc_Com_Ostate)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X,c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_COMBB(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),c_Com_Obody,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Com_Opname),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool))
    | ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
    | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_MGF__lemma2__simult_0) ).

cnf(cls_image__image_0,axiom,
    c_Set_Oimage(X,c_Set_Oimage(Y,Z,U,V),V,W) = c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(X,Y,V,W,U),Z,U,W),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_image__image_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_1,negated_conjecture,
    c_Com_OWT__bodies,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_1) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Set_Oimage(c_COMBB(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_COMBB(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),c_Com_Obody,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Com_Opname),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_Com_Opname),c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_4) ).

cnf(374,plain,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Set_Oimage(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Set_Oimage(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),c_Set_Oimage(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Set_Oimage(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),c_Set_Oimage(c_Com_Obody,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_Com_Ostate),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_4,cls_image__image_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(409,plain,
    ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(c_Set_Oimage(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Set_Oimage(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),X,tc_Com_Ostate)
    | ~ c_lessequals(X,c_Set_Oimage(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,c_Set_Oimage(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),c_Set_Oimage(c_Com_Obody,c_Map_Odom(c_Com_Obody,tc_Com_Opname,tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Opname,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom),tc_Com_Ocom,tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_bool)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_MGF__lemma2__simult_0,cls_conjecture_0,cls_conjecture_1,cls_image__image_0,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(4502,plain,
    $false,
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[409,374,cls_equalityE_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV908-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 16:01:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T16:01:37
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n008.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T16:01:37
% 3.45/3.65  
% 3.45/3.65  
% 3.45/3.65  #||
% 3.45/3.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.45/3.65  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 3.45/3.65  ||#
% 3.45/3.65  
% 3.45/3.65  ; Summary of computation:
% 3.45/3.65  ;     10296 formulas have been input or derived (from 374 formulas).
% 3.45/3.65  ;      4502 (44%) were retained.  Of these,
% 3.45/3.65  ;           65 ( 1%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 3.45/3.65  ;         4437 (99%) are still being kept.
% 3.45/3.65  ; 
% 3.45/3.65  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.106   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.004   0%   Assert                       (481 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.455  14%   Process new row              (9,419 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.257   8%   Resolution                   (746 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.041   1%   Paramodulation               (373 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (12 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.021   1%   Condensing                   (1,460 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.075   2%   Forward subsumption          (1,460 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.027   1%   Backward subsumption         (1,141 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.015   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (2,188 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.642  20%   Forward simplification       (9,410 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.070   2%   Backward simplification      (4,493 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     1.412  44%   Ordering                     (136,992 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.001   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 3.45/3.66  ;     0.064   2%   Other
% 3.45/3.66  ;     3.190        Total
% 3.45/3.66  ;     3.192        Real time
% 3.45/3.66  ; 
% 3.49/3.66  ; Term-hash-array has 11,425 terms in all.
% 3.49/3.66  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,111 entries (1,111 at peak, 1,141 added, 30 deleted).
% 3.49/3.66  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 9,312 nodes (9,312 at peak, 9,736 added, 424 deleted).
% 3.49/3.66  ;  Retrieved 4,394 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,460 calls.
% 3.49/3.66  ;  Retrieved 483 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,141 calls.
% 3.49/3.66  ; Path-index has 11,342 entries (11,342 at peak, 11,487 added, 145 deleted).
% 3.49/3.66  ; Path-index has 20,284 nodes (20,284 at peak, 20,462 added, 178 deleted).
% 3.49/3.66  ; Trie-index has 11,342 entries (11,342 at peak, 11,487 added, 145 deleted).
% 3.49/3.66  ; Trie-index has 67,477 nodes (67,477 at peak, 68,293 added, 816 deleted).
% 3.49/3.66  ; Retrieved 140,140 generalization terms in 44,521 calls.
% 3.49/3.66  ; Retrieved 5,422 instance terms in 3,619 calls.
% 3.49/3.66  ; Retrieved 298,633 unifiable terms in 5,598 calls.
% 3.49/3.66  ; 
% 3.49/3.66  ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 3.49/3.66  ;     1 with value 25              1 with value 51               1 with value 54
% 3.49/3.66  ;     1 with value 41              1 with value 52
% 3.49/3.66  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 12 entries:
% 3.49/3.66  ;     1 with value 52              1 with value 70               1 with value 155
% 3.49/3.66  ;     1 with value 53              1 with value 77               2 with value 172
% 3.49/3.66  ;     1 with value 57              1 with value 81               2 with value 178
% 3.49/3.66  ;     1 with value 67
% 3.49/3.66  ; The agenda of rows to give has 4056 entries:
% 3.49/3.66  ;     1 with value (4 4)          73 with value (4 29)          40 with value (4 54)
% 3.49/3.66  ;     1 with value (4 5)          60 with value (4 30)           5 with value (4 55)
% 3.49/3.66  ;     4 with value (4 6)          50 with value (4 31)           6 with value (4 56)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    21 with value (4 7)          55 with value (4 32)           3 with value (4 57)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    10 with value (4 8)          43 with value (4 33)           3 with value (4 58)
% 3.49/3.66  ;     9 with value (4 9)          58 with value (4 34)           4 with value (4 59)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    21 with value (4 10)         40 with value (4 35)           3 with value (4 60)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    24 with value (4 11)         44 with value (4 36)           6 with value (4 61)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    37 with value (4 12)         37 with value (4 37)           4 with value (4 62)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    75 with value (4 13)         45 with value (4 38)           3 with value (4 63)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    90 with value (4 14)         41 with value (4 39)           9 with value (4 64)
% 3.49/3.66  ;   118 with value (4 15)         31 with value (4 40)           2 with value (4 66)
% 3.49/3.66  ;   191 with value (4 16)         28 with value (4 41)           3 with value (4 67)
% 3.49/3.66  ;   163 with value (4 17)         34 with value (4 42)           8 with value (4 69)
% 3.49/3.66  ;   222 with value (4 18)         26 with value (4 43)           3 with value (4 70)
% 3.49/3.66  ;   102 with value (4 19)         33 with value (4 44)           1 with value (4 71)
% 3.49/3.66  ;   119 with value (4 20)         34 with value (4 45)           2 with value (4 73)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    94 with value (4 21)         75 with value (4 46)           2 with value (4 74)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    55 with value (4 22)        133 with value (4 47)           1 with value (4 76)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    57 with value (4 23)        200 with value (4 48)           1 with value (4 78)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    82 with value (4 24)        138 with value (4 49)           1 with value (4 79)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    95 with value (4 25)        382 with value (4 50)           1 with value (4 80)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    69 with value (4 26)        278 with value (4 51)           1 with value (4 82)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    57 with value (4 27)        145 with value (4 52)           1 with value (4 86)
% 3.49/3.66  ;    76 with value (4 28)         67 with value (4 53)
% 3.49/3.66  Evaluation took:
% 3.49/3.66    3.193 seconds of real time
% 3.49/3.66    2.93929 seconds of user run time
% 3.49/3.66    0.253237 seconds of system run time
% 3.49/3.66    [Run times include 0.26 seconds GC run time.]
% 3.49/3.66    0 calls to %EVAL
% 3.49/3.66    0 page faults and
% 3.49/3.66    220,774,488 bytes consed.
% 3.49/3.66  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.49/3.66  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T16:01:41
% 3.49/3.66  :PROOF-FOUND
% 3.49/3.66  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------