%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV913-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 10 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 13 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_asm_0,axiom,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3),tc_bool))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_asm_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_equalityE_0,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_equalityE_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3),tc_bool))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_asm_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_lessequals(X2,X1,tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(X3),tc_bool))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_lessequals(X1,X1,tc_fun(X2,tc_bool)),
cls_equalityE_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),v_t),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_bool))),t_a),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(X1,X1,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV913-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:31:19 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.49 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.18/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % new_bool_1 with pid 3128490 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.18/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.18/0.49 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.49 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLF31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3128492 completed with status 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.18/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.18/0.49 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.18/0.49 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLF31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.49 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.18/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.49 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 % Proof found!
% 0.18/0.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.18/0.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.49 % Parsed axioms : 521
% 0.18/0.49 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 390
% 0.18/0.49 % Initial clauses : 131
% 0.18/0.49 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Initial clauses in saturation : 131
% 0.18/0.49 % Processed clauses : 605
% 0.18/0.49 % ...of these trivial : 30
% 0.18/0.49 % ...subsumed : 409
% 0.18/0.49 % ...remaining for further processing : 165
% 0.18/0.49 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 24
% 0.18/0.49 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Backward-rewritten : 4
% 0.18/0.49 % Generated clauses : 2165
% 0.18/0.49 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1629
% 0.18/0.49 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Paramodulations : 2137
% 0.18/0.49 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Equation resolutions : 28
% 0.18/0.49 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Total rewrite steps : 472
% 0.18/0.49 % ...of those cached : 302
% 0.18/0.49 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.49 % Current number of processed clauses : 161
% 0.18/0.49 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 42
% 0.18/0.49 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.18/0.49 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.18/0.49 % Non-unit-clauses : 108
% 0.18/0.49 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1154
% 0.18/0.49 % ...number of literals in the above : 2403
% 0.18/0.49 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.18/0.49 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2009
% 0.18/0.49 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1840
% 0.18/0.49 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 319
% 0.18/0.49 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11
% 0.18/0.49 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % BW rewrite match attempts : 159
% 0.18/0.49 % BW rewrite match successes : 40
% 0.18/0.49 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.49 % Termbank termtop insertions : 45539
% 0.18/0.49 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2033
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 % User time : 0.043 s
% 0.18/0.49 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.18/0.49 % Total time : 0.049 s
% 0.18/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 4328 pages
% 0.18/0.49
% 0.18/0.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.49 % User time : 0.062 s
% 0.18/0.49 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.18/0.49 % Total time : 0.070 s
% 0.18/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.18/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------