%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV917-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.28s 0.65s
% Output : Saturation 0.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_11ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_25ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2) != c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X3,X2)
| X1 = X3 ),
c_0_11,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
( X1 = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__Some__eq__1__1(X1,X2),X2)
| X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2) ),
cls_not__Some__eq_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X1) != c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X2,X1),
c_0_12,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
( X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2)
| X1 = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__None__eq__1__1(X1,X2),X2) ),
cls_not__None__eq_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
( X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2)
| X1 = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xnchotomy__1__1(X1,X2),X2) ),
cls_option_Onchotomy_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__Some__eq__1__1(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14])]),c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
( X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2)
| X1 = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xexhaust__1__1(X1,X2),X2) ),
cls_option_Oexhaust_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__None__eq__1__1(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_16])]),c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xnchotomy__1__1(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_17])]),c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2)
| c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xexhaust__1__1(X1,X2) = c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__Some__eq__1__1(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2)
| c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xexhaust__1__1(X1,X2) = c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__None__eq__1__1(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_19]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2)
| c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xexhaust__1__1(X1,X2) = c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xnchotomy__1__1(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_19]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2)
| c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__Some__eq__1__1(X1,X2) = c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__None__eq__1__1(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2)
| c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__Some__eq__1__1(X1,X2) = c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xnchotomy__1__1(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2)
| c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xnot__None__eq__1__1(X1,X2) = c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xnchotomy__1__1(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ c_Option_Ois__none(X1,X2)
| X1 = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2) ),
c_0_22,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),
c_0_23,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
~ c_Option_Ois__none(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2),
c_0_24,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
c_ATP__Linkup_Osko__Option__Xoption__Xexhaust__1__1(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_19])]),c_0_15]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,axiom,
c_Objects_Onew__Addr(v_ha____) = c_Option_Ooption_OSome(v_a____,tc_nat),
cls_CHAINED_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,axiom,
c_Option_Ois__none(c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X1),X1),
cls_is__none__def_1,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV917-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.47 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.23/0.47 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.23/0.47 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.23/0.47 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.23/0.47 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.23/0.47 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.23/0.47 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.23/0.47 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:31:43 UTC 2026
% 0.23/0.48 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.48 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.28/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.28/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.28/0.65 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.28/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1421336 completed with status 1
% 0.28/0.65 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.28/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.65 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.28/0.65 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.65 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1421340 completed with status 1
% 0.28/0.65 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.28/0.65 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.28/0.65 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.28/0.65 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.28/0.65 % Search class: FGUSF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.28/0.65 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.28/0.65 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.28/0.65 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.28/0.65
% 0.28/0.65 % No proof found!
% 0.28/0.65 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.28/0.65 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.28/0.65 % Parsed axioms : 14
% 0.28/0.65 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Initial clauses : 14
% 0.28/0.65 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Initial clauses in saturation : 14
% 0.28/0.65 % Processed clauses : 48
% 0.28/0.65 % ...of these trivial : 4
% 0.28/0.65 % ...subsumed : 23
% 0.28/0.65 % ...remaining for further processing : 21
% 0.28/0.65 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 8
% 0.28/0.65 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Generated clauses : 53
% 0.28/0.65 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 34
% 0.28/0.65 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Paramodulations : 44
% 0.28/0.65 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % NegExts : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Equation resolutions : 9
% 0.28/0.65 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.28/0.65 % ...of those cached : 6
% 0.28/0.65 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.65 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.65 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.65 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.65 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.65 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.28/0.65 % Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.28/0.65 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 6
% 0.28/0.65 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.28/0.65 % Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 0.28/0.65 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.28/0.65 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20
% 0.28/0.65 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 20
% 0.28/0.65 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 0.28/0.65 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.28/0.65 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.28/0.65 % Termbank termtop insertions : 518
% 0.28/0.65 % Search garbage collected termcells : 14
% 0.28/0.65
% 0.28/0.65 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.65 % User time : 0.008 s
% 0.28/0.65 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.28/0.65 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.28/0.65 % Maximum resident set size: 3388 pages
% 0.28/0.65
% 0.28/0.65 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.28/0.65 % User time : 0.025 s
% 0.28/0.65 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.28/0.65 % Total time : 0.036 s
% 0.28/0.65 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.28/0.65 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------