%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV918-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.23s 0.55s
% Output : Saturation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_13ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_15ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
ifeq(c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,X2,X3),true,c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X2),true) = true,
cls_hconf__def_1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) = true,
cls_hconf_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_001,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(v_ha____) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) != true,
c_0_13,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
v_h_Ha____ = c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))),
cls_CHAINED_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) = true,
cls_CHAINED_0_01,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),
cls_CHAINED_0_02,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
ifeq(c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,v_ha____,X2),true,true,true) = true,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
ifeq2(c_fequal(X1,X2,X3),true,X1,X2) = X2,
cls_ATP__Linkup_Ofequal__imp__equal_0,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
c_fequal(X1,X1,X2) = true,
cls_ATP__Linkup_Oequal__imp__fequal_0,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV918-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.45 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:33:15 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.55 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 3964050 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.55 % Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.23/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.55 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.55 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.55 % partial match(1): FUUPM-FFSF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.55 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting G----_X1276__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3964054 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.55 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.55 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.23/0.55 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.23/0.55 % Search class: FUUPM-FFSS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.55 % partial match(1): FUUPM-FFSF32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.55 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.23/0.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.55 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.55
% 0.23/0.55 % No proof found!
% 0.23/0.55 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.23/0.55 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.55 % Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.23/0.55 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Initial clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.55 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.23/0.55 % Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.23/0.55 % Processed clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.55 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % ...remaining for further processing : 12
% 0.23/0.55 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.55 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.23/0.55 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.23/0.55 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.23/0.55 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.55 % Current number of processed clauses : 12
% 0.23/0.55 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.23/0.55 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.55 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.55 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.55 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.55 % Termbank termtop insertions : 343
% 0.23/0.55 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.23/0.55
% 0.23/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.55 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.55 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.23/0.55 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.23/0.55
% 0.23/0.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.55 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.23/0.55 % System time : 0.016 s
% 0.23/0.55 % Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.23/0.55 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------