↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.SAT-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : SWV918-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 18:23:56 EDT 2022

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.15s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SWV918-10 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 00:19:20 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.39  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.39  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.15/0.39  #
% 0.15/0.39  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.39  # Number of axioms: 10 Number of unprocessed: 10
% 0.15/0.39  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.15/0.39  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.15/0.39  # Hello from C++
% 0.15/0.39  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.15/0.39  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.15/0.39  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.15/0.39  # 10 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.15/0.39  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.15/0.39  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.15/0.39  # Found 10 unit axioms.
% 0.15/0.39  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.15/0.39  # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.15/0.39  # 10 unit axiom clauses
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.15/0.39  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.15/0.39  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.15/0.39  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.15/0.39  # Returning from population with 53 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.15/0.39  # We now have 53 tableaux to operate on
% 0.15/0.40  # 6130 Satisfiable branch
% 0.15/0.40  # 6131 Satisfiable branch
% 0.15/0.40  # 6137 Satisfiable branch
% 0.15/0.40  # 6132 Satisfiable branch
% 0.15/0.40  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.40  # 6134 Satisfiable branch
% 0.15/0.40  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.40  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2)=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____))).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,X2,X3),true,c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X2),true)=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (ifeq2(c_fequal(X1,X2,X3),true,X1,X2)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))!=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.40  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.40  # Found 6 steps
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X14,X14,X13)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c_fequal(X14,X14,X13)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_46])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_120, plain, (c_fequal(true,true,true)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_121, plain, (c_fequal(true,true,true)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_119, plain, (c_fequal(c_fequal(true,true,true),c_fequal(true,true,true),c_fequal(X14,X14,X13))=c_fequal(true,true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_129, plain, (c_fequal(true,true,true)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.40  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2)=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____))).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,X2,X3),true,c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X2),true)=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (ifeq2(c_fequal(X1,X2,X3),true,X1,X2)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))!=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.40  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.40  # Found 7 steps
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X16,X16,X15)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c_fequal(X16,X16,X15)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_43])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_110, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,c_Conform_Ooconf(true,true,true,true))!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_111, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,c_Conform_Ooconf(true,true,true,true))!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_113, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,c_Conform_Ooconf(true,true,true,true))!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_109, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(c_fequal(X1,X1,c_Conform_Ooconf(true,true,true,true)),c_fequal(X1,X1,c_Conform_Ooconf(true,true,true,true)),c_fequal(X16,X16,X15),c_fequal(X1,X1,c_Conform_Ooconf(true,true,true,true)))=c_Conform_Ooconf(true,true,true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_129, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(true,true,true,true)!=ifeq2(X1,X1,c_Conform_Ooconf(true,true,true,true),X3)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.15/0.40  # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.40  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.40  # 6135 Satisfiable branch
% 0.15/0.40  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2)=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____))).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,X2,X3),true,c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X2),true)=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (ifeq2(c_fequal(X1,X2,X3),true,X1,X2)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))!=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.40  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.40  # Found 6 steps
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X10,X10,X9)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c_fequal(X10,X10,X9)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_46])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_121, plain, (c_fequal(true,true,true)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_122, plain, (c_fequal(true,true,true)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_119, plain, (c_fequal(c_fequal(X10,X10,X9),c_fequal(true,true,true),c_fequal(true,true,true))=c_fequal(true,true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_129, plain, (c_fequal(true,true,true)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.40  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.40  # 6136 Satisfiable branch
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2)=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____))).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,X2,X3),true,c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X2),true)=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (ifeq2(c_fequal(X1,X2,X3),true,X1,X2)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))!=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.40  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.40  # Found 6 steps
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X12,X12,X11)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c_fequal(X12,X12,X11)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_46])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_120, plain, (c_fequal(true,true,true)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_122, plain, (c_fequal(true,true,true)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_119, plain, (c_fequal(c_fequal(true,true,true),c_fequal(X12,X12,X11),c_fequal(true,true,true))=c_fequal(true,true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_129, plain, (c_fequal(true,true,true)!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.40  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.40  # 6133 Satisfiable branch
% 0.15/0.40  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.40  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.40  
% 0.15/0.40  # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2)=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____))).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,X2,X3),true,c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X2),true)=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (ifeq2(c_fequal(X1,X2,X3),true,X1,X2)=X2)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))!=true)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.40  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.40  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.40  # Found 5 steps
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X8,X8,X7)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c_fequal(X8,X8,X7)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_116, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,hAPP(true,true))!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_114, plain, (hAPP(c_fequal(X8,X8,X7),c_fequal(X1,X1,hAPP(true,true)))=hAPP(true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.15/0.40  cnf(i_0_129, plain, (hAPP(true,true)!=ifeq2(X1,X1,hAPP(true,true),X3)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.15/0.40  # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.40  # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.40  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.22/0.40  # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.40  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.40  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  # End clausification derivation
% 0.22/0.40  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,X2)=true)).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (ifeq(X1,X1,X2,X3)=X2)).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))=hAPP(v_ha____,v_a____))).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (ifeq(c_Conform_Ohconf(X1,X2,X3),true,c_Exceptions_Opreallocated(X2),true)=true)).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (ifeq2(c_fequal(X1,X2,X3),true,X1,X2)=X2)).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (c_Conform_Ooconf(v_P,v_ha____,c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))=true)).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha____,v_a____,c_Option_Ooption_OSome(c_Pair(v_C____,c_Objects_Oinit__fields(v_FDTs____),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))=v_h_Ha____)).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_22, negated_conjecture, (c_Conform_Ohconf(v_P,v_h_Ha____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))!=true)).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.22/0.40  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.22/0.40  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.22/0.40  # Found 5 steps
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (c_fequal(X10,X10,X9)=true), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (c_fequal(X10,X10,X9)=true), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_44])).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_115, plain, (c_fequal(X1,X1,hAPP(true,true))!=true), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_23])).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_114, plain, (hAPP(c_fequal(X1,X1,hAPP(true,true)),c_fequal(X10,X10,X9))=hAPP(true,true)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_29])).
% 0.22/0.40  cnf(i_0_129, plain, (hAPP(true,true)!=ifeq2(X1,X1,hAPP(true,true),X3)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.22/0.40  # End printing tableau
% 0.22/0.40  # SZS output end
% 0.22/0.40  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.22/0.40  # Satisfiable branch found.
% 0.22/0.40  # Child (6137) has found a proof.
% 0.22/0.40  
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.22/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.22/0.40  # Proof search is over...
% 0.22/0.40  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------