↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWV921-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:12 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.48s 1.10s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   18 (  10 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   29 (   6 equ;  14 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   22 (  22 usr;  13 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_hext__upd__obj_0,axiom,
    ( hAPP(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X4))
    | c_Objects_Ohext(X1,c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X1,X2,hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X5)),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_hext__upd__obj_0) ).

cnf(cls_lconf__hext_0,axiom,
    ( ~ c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5)
    | ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X6,X2)
    | c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_lconf__hext_0) ).

cnf(cls_RedFAss_Ohyps_0,axiom,
    hAPP(v_ha______,v_a______) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C______),v_fs______)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_RedFAss_Ohyps_0) ).

cnf(cls_RedFAss_I3_J_0,axiom,
    c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_RedFAss_I3_J_0) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C______),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_fs______,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F______),v_D______),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),v_v______),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))),v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( hAPP(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X4))
    | c_Objects_Ohext(X1,c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X1,X2,hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X5)),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_hext__upd__obj_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5)
    | ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X6,X2)
    | c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_lconf__hext_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( hAPP(X1,X2) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X4))
    | c_Objects_Ohext(X1,c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X1,X2,hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),X3),X5)),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))) ),
    c_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    hAPP(v_ha______,v_a______) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C______),v_fs______)),
    cls_RedFAss_Ohyps_0 ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X6,X3,X4,X5)
    | ~ c_Objects_Ohext(X6,X2)
    | c_Conform_Olconf(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) ),
    c_0_6 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,v_ha______,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
    cls_RedFAss_I3_J_0 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( hAPP(X1,X2) != hAPP(v_ha______,v_a______)
    | c_Objects_Ohext(X1,c_Fun_Ofun__upd(X1,X2,hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C______),X3)),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C______),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_fs______,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F______),v_D______),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),v_v______),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))),v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,X1)
    | c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,X1,v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    c_Objects_Ohext(v_ha______,c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C______),X1)),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))))),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C______),c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_fs______,hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F______),v_D______),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Value_Oval),v_v______),tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))),v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    c_Conform_Olconf(v_P,c_Fun_Ofun__upd(v_ha______,v_a______,hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval)))),hAPP(hAPP(c_Pair(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))),v_C______),X1)),tc_nat,tc_Option_Ooption(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_fun(tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Value_Oval))))),v_la______,v_E____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWV921-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.65  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.65  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.65  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.65  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.65  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.65  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.65  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.65  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:32:56 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.65  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.65  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.72  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.73  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.48/1.10  % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.48/1.10  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.48/1.10  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % new_bool_3 with pid 679128 completed with status 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.48/1.10  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.48/1.10  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.48/1.10  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.48/1.10  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.48/1.10  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % new_bool_3 with pid 679133 completed with status 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.48/1.10  % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 1.48/1.10  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.48/1.10  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.48/1.10  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 1.48/1.10  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 55s (1) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % Starting new_bool_3 with 61s (1) cores
% 1.48/1.10  % Preprocessing time       : 0.019 s
% 1.48/1.10  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.48/1.10  
% 1.48/1.10  % Proof found!
% 1.48/1.10  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.48/1.10  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.48/1.10  % Parsed axioms                        : 778
% 1.48/1.10  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 327
% 1.48/1.10  % Initial clauses                      : 451
% 1.48/1.10  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 451
% 1.48/1.10  % Processed clauses                    : 1006
% 1.48/1.10  % ...of these trivial                  : 16
% 1.48/1.10  % ...subsumed                          : 300
% 1.48/1.10  % ...remaining for further processing  : 690
% 1.48/1.10  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 16
% 1.48/1.10  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Backward-subsumed                    : 12
% 1.48/1.10  % Backward-rewritten                   : 7
% 1.48/1.10  % Generated clauses                    : 1248
% 1.48/1.10  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1043
% 1.48/1.10  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Paramodulations                      : 1180
% 1.48/1.10  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % NegExts                              : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Equation resolutions                 : 68
% 1.48/1.10  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Total rewrite steps                  : 160
% 1.48/1.10  % ...of those cached                   : 65
% 1.48/1.10  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.48/1.10  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.48/1.10  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.48/1.10  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.48/1.10  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.48/1.10  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.48/1.10  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.48/1.10  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.48/1.10  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.48/1.10  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.48/1.10  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.48/1.10  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.48/1.10  % Current number of processed clauses  : 348
% 1.48/1.10  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 75
% 1.48/1.10  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 1.48/1.10  %    Negative unit clauses             : 102
% 1.48/1.10  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 169
% 1.48/1.10  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 788
% 1.48/1.10  % ...number of literals in the above   : 1353
% 1.48/1.10  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Current number of archived clauses   : 342
% 1.48/1.10  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42442
% 1.48/1.10  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23605
% 1.48/1.10  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 148
% 1.48/1.10  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6737
% 1.48/1.10  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 470
% 1.48/1.10  % BW rewrite match successes           : 15
% 1.48/1.10  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.48/1.10  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 131690
% 1.48/1.10  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2637
% 1.48/1.10  
% 1.48/1.10  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.48/1.10  % User time                : 0.219 s
% 1.48/1.10  % System time              : 0.018 s
% 1.48/1.10  % Total time               : 0.237 s
% 1.48/1.10  % Maximum resident set size: 5036 pages
% 1.48/1.10  
% 1.48/1.10  % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.48/1.10  % User time                : 0.485 s
% 1.48/1.10  % System time              : 0.034 s
% 1.48/1.10  % Total time               : 0.520 s
% 1.48/1.10  % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 1.48/1.10  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------