%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV938-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:13 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 5.32s 1.30s
% Output : CNFRefutation 5.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 11 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 64 ( 8 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_wt__env__mono_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellType_OWT(X1,X5,X3,X4)
| ~ c_Map_Omap__le(X5,X2,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty)
| c_WellType_OWT(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_wt__env__mono_0) ).
cnf(cls_map__le__upds_0,axiom,
( ~ c_Map_Omap__le(X1,X6,X4,X5)
| c_Map_Omap__le(c_Map_Omap__upds(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),c_Map_Omap__upds(X6,X2,X3,X4,X5),X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_map__le__upds_0) ).
cnf(cls_WT__implies__WTrt_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellType_OWT(X1,X3,X4,X5)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WT__implies__WTrt_0) ).
cnf(cls_wtabody_0,axiom,
c_WellType_OWT(v_P,c_Map_Omap__upds(c_COMBK(c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Type_Oty),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Type_Oty),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty),v_body____,v_T_H_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_wtabody_0) ).
cnf(cls_map__le__empty_0,axiom,
c_Map_Omap__le(c_COMBK(c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X1),tc_Option_Ooption(X1),X2),X3,X2,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_map__le__empty_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,c_Map_Omap__upds(v_E____,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty),v_body____,v_T_H_H____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_WellType_OWT(X1,X5,X3,X4)
| ~ c_Map_Omap__le(X5,X2,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty)
| c_WellType_OWT(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_wt__env__mono_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_Map_Omap__le(X1,X6,X4,X5)
| c_Map_Omap__le(c_Map_Omap__upds(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),c_Map_Omap__upds(X6,X2,X3,X4,X5),X4,X5) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_map__le__upds_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_WellType_OWT(X1,X5,X3,X4)
| ~ c_Map_Omap__le(X5,X2,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty)
| c_WellType_OWT(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_Map_Omap__le(X1,X6,X4,X5)
| c_Map_Omap__le(c_Map_Omap__upds(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5),c_Map_Omap__upds(X6,X2,X3,X4,X5),X4,X5) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_WellType_OWT(X1,X3,X4,X5)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WT__implies__WTrt_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_WellType_OWT(X1,c_Map_Omap__upds(X7,X3,X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty),X5,X6)
| ~ c_Map_Omap__le(X7,X2,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty)
| c_WellType_OWT(X1,c_Map_Omap__upds(X2,X3,X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty),X5,X6) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
c_WellType_OWT(v_P,c_Map_Omap__upds(c_COMBK(c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Type_Oty),tc_Option_Ooption(tc_Type_Oty),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty),v_body____,v_T_H_H____),
cls_wtabody_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
c_Map_Omap__le(c_COMBK(c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X1),tc_Option_Ooption(X1),X2),X3,X2,X1),
cls_map__le__empty_0 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,c_Map_Omap__upds(v_E____,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty),v_body____,v_T_H_H____),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_WellType_OWT(X1,X3,X4,X5)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
c_WellType_OWT(v_P,c_Map_Omap__upds(X1,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty),v_body____,v_T_H_H____),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,c_Map_Omap__upds(v_E____,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty),v_body____,v_T_H_H____),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,X1,c_Map_Omap__upds(X2,c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Othis,v_pns____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_List_Olist_OCons(c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_D____),v_Ts____,tc_Type_Oty),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar),tc_Type_Oty),v_body____,v_T_H_H____),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV938-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:34:23 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.32/1.30 % Version: 3.5.1
% 5.32/1.30 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 5.32/1.30 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % new_bool_3 with pid 680743 completed with status 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 5.32/1.30 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 5.32/1.30 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 5.32/1.30 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.32/1.30 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 5.32/1.30 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 680752 completed with status 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 5.32/1.30 % Preprocessing class: FSLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 5.32/1.30 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2S with 1200s (4) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 5.32/1.30 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 5.32/1.30 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM32-MFFFFFNN
% 5.32/1.30 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 5.32/1.30 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 5.32/1.30 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 5.32/1.30
% 5.32/1.30 % Proof found!
% 5.32/1.30 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 5.32/1.30 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 5.32/1.30 % Parsed axioms : 501
% 5.32/1.30 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 234
% 5.32/1.30 % Initial clauses : 267
% 5.32/1.30 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Initial clauses in saturation : 267
% 5.32/1.30 % Processed clauses : 4062
% 5.32/1.30 % ...of these trivial : 38
% 5.32/1.30 % ...subsumed : 2849
% 5.32/1.30 % ...remaining for further processing : 1175
% 5.32/1.30 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 95
% 5.32/1.30 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Backward-subsumed : 122
% 5.32/1.30 % Backward-rewritten : 15
% 5.32/1.30 % Generated clauses : 17217
% 5.32/1.30 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 16196
% 5.32/1.30 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Paramodulations : 17054
% 5.32/1.30 % Factorizations : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % NegExts : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Equation resolutions : 163
% 5.32/1.30 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Total rewrite steps : 5609
% 5.32/1.30 % ...of those cached : 3387
% 5.32/1.30 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Propositional check models : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 5.32/1.30 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 5.32/1.30 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 5.32/1.30 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 5.32/1.30 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 5.32/1.30 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 5.32/1.30 % Current number of processed clauses : 851
% 5.32/1.30 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 74
% 5.32/1.30 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 5.32/1.30 % Negative unit clauses : 301
% 5.32/1.30 % Non-unit-clauses : 466
% 5.32/1.30 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12418
% 5.32/1.30 % ...number of literals in the above : 24845
% 5.32/1.30 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Current number of archived clauses : 324
% 5.32/1.30 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 43093
% 5.32/1.30 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40057
% 5.32/1.30 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 894
% 5.32/1.30 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8839
% 5.32/1.30 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % BW rewrite match attempts : 166
% 5.32/1.30 % BW rewrite match successes : 57
% 5.32/1.30 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Condensation successes : 0
% 5.32/1.30 % Termbank termtop insertions : 214004
% 5.32/1.30 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1564
% 5.32/1.30
% 5.32/1.30 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.32/1.30 % User time : 0.683 s
% 5.32/1.30 % System time : 0.035 s
% 5.32/1.30 % Total time : 0.718 s
% 5.32/1.30 % Maximum resident set size: 4280 pages
% 5.32/1.30
% 5.32/1.30 % -------------------------------------------------
% 5.32/1.30 % User time : 1.386 s
% 5.32/1.30 % System time : 0.077 s
% 5.32/1.30 % Total time : 1.463 s
% 5.32/1.30 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 5.32/1.30 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------