%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV943-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:13 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 3
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 8 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 11 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 8 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
c_0_3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OBinOp(v_e_092_060_094isub_0621_H____,v_bop____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]),c_0_6])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV943-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:33:05 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % new_bool_1 with pid 457558 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.47 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.47 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 457567 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.47 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.47 % Search class: FGHSF-FSLS32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.47 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.47 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.47 % Parsed axioms : 383
% 0.14/0.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 89
% 0.14/0.47 % Initial clauses : 294
% 0.14/0.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 294
% 0.14/0.47 % Processed clauses : 363
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % ...subsumed : 165
% 0.14/0.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 198
% 0.14/0.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Generated clauses : 140
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 96
% 0.14/0.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Paramodulations : 101
% 0.14/0.47 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.14/0.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Equation resolutions : 37
% 0.14/0.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.14/0.47 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 198
% 0.14/0.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.14/0.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Negative unit clauses : 107
% 0.14/0.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 87
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 24
% 0.14/0.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 85
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3006
% 0.14/0.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2614
% 0.14/0.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 56
% 0.14/0.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1445
% 0.14/0.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7797
% 0.14/0.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1163
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.47 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.14/0.47 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4152 pages
% 0.14/0.47
% 0.14/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.47 % User time : 0.025 s
% 0.14/0.47 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.14/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------