↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SWV949-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:36:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.83s 1.02s
% Output   : Refutation 0.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   11 (   1 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   16 (  16 usr;  10 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_WTrtFAccNT_0,axiom,
    ( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X,Y,Z,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(U,V,W,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X,Y,Z,U,c_Type_Oty_ONT) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrtFAccNT_0) ).

cnf(cls_wte_H_0,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,v_U____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_wte_H_0) ).

cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X,Y),Z),Z)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).

cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
    v_U____ = c_Type_Oty_ONT,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).

cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X),v_T____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).

cnf(261,plain,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_wte_H_0,cls_CHAINED_0_01,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(4812,plain,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(v_e_Ha____,X,Y,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),Z),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[cls_WTrtFAccNT_0,261]) ).

cnf(4813,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X),v_T____)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0,4812]) ).

cnf(4814,plain,
    $false,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[4813,cls_widen__refl_0]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.10  % Problem  : SWV949-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.11/0.11  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 15:21:43 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.40  /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41  * 
% 0.15/0.41  * 
% 0.15/0.41  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.15/0.41  * 
% 0.15/0.41  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.15/0.41  * 
% 0.15/0.41  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.15/0.41   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.15/0.41   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.15/0.41   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.15/0.41   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.15/0.41   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.15/0.41   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.15/0.41   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.15/0.41   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.15/0.41   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.15/0.41   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.15/0.41   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.15/0.41   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.15/0.41  * 
% 0.15/0.41  "."
% 0.15/0.41  * 
% 0.15/0.41  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T15:21:43
% 0.15/0.41  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n032.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T15:21:43
% 0.83/1.02  
% 0.83/1.02  
% 0.83/1.02  #||
% 0.83/1.02  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.83/1.02  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.83/1.02  ||#
% 0.83/1.02  
% 0.83/1.02  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.83/1.02  ;      9140 formulas have been input or derived (from 198 formulas).
% 0.83/1.02  ;      4814 (53%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.83/1.02  ;            6 ( 0%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.83/1.02  ;         4808 (100%) are still being kept.
% 0.83/1.02  ; 
% 0.83/1.02  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.046   8%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.003   0%   Assert                       (370 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.251  41%   Process new row              (8,549 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.089  15%   Resolution                   (394 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.001   0%   Paramodulation               (197 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.003   0%   Condensing                   (105 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.002   0%   Forward subsumption          (105 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.002   0%   Backward subsumption         (105 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.006   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (80 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.102  17%   Forward simplification       (8,549 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.047   8%   Backward simplification      (4,814 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.001   0%   Ordering                     (111 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.053   9%   Other
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.606        Total
% 0.83/1.02  ;     0.608        Real time
% 0.83/1.02  ; 
% 0.83/1.02  ; Term-hash-array has 8,656 terms in all.
% 0.83/1.02  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 101 entries (102 at peak, 105 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.83/1.02  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 502 nodes (530 at peak, 600 added, 98 deleted).
% 0.83/1.02  ;  Retrieved 58 possibly forward subsuming rows in 105 calls.
% 0.83/1.02  ;  Retrieved 59 possibly backward subsumed rows in 105 calls.
% 0.83/1.02  ; Path-index has 8,654 entries (8,656 at peak, 8,678 added, 24 deleted).
% 0.83/1.02  ; Path-index has 12,073 nodes (12,073 at peak, 12,081 added, 8 deleted).
% 0.83/1.02  ; Trie-index has 8,654 entries (8,656 at peak, 8,678 added, 24 deleted).
% 0.83/1.02  ; Trie-index has 40,255 nodes (40,264 at peak, 40,279 added, 24 deleted).
% 0.83/1.02  ; Retrieved 4,141 generalization terms in 8,608 calls.
% 0.83/1.02  ; Retrieved 4,724 instance terms in 4,708 calls.
% 0.83/1.02  ; Retrieved 174,921 unifiable terms in 2,193 calls.
% 0.83/1.02  ; 
% 0.83/1.02  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 62 entries:
% 0.83/1.02  ;     1 with value 22              1 with value 36               2 with value 62
% 0.83/1.02  ;     2 with value 24              1 with value 38               3 with value 66
% 0.83/1.02  ;     3 with value 26              2 with value 39               2 with value 73
% 0.83/1.02  ;     2 with value 27              2 with value 40               4 with value 77
% 0.83/1.02  ;     5 with value 28              1 with value 44               2 with value 82
% 0.83/1.02  ;     1 with value 30              1 with value 45               1 with value 86
% 0.83/1.02  ;     9 with value 31              3 with value 53               2 with value 90
% 0.83/1.02  ;     1 with value 33              1 with value 54               1 with value 110
% 0.83/1.02  ;     7 with value 35              2 with value 58
% 0.83/1.02  ; The agenda of rows to give has 4548 entries:
% 0.83/1.02  ;     2 with value (4 8)         198 with value (4 16)         686 with value (4 22)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     9 with value (4 10)        258 with value (4 17)         522 with value (4 23)
% 0.83/1.02  ;     4 with value (4 11)        354 with value (4 18)         394 with value (4 24)
% 0.83/1.02  ;    20 with value (4 12)        459 with value (4 19)         161 with value (4 25)
% 0.83/1.02  ;    14 with value (4 13)        574 with value (4 20)          80 with value (4 26)
% 0.83/1.02  ;    63 with value (4 14)        658 with value (4 21)           8 with value (4 27)
% 0.83/1.02  ;    84 with value (4 15)
% 0.83/1.02  Evaluation took:
% 0.83/1.02    0.608 seconds of real time
% 0.83/1.02    0.549489 seconds of user run time
% 0.83/1.02    0.058782 seconds of system run time
% 0.83/1.02    [Run times include 0.053 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.83/1.02    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.83/1.02    0 page faults and
% 0.83/1.02    56,183,672 bytes consed.
% 0.83/1.02  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.83/1.02  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T15:21:43
% 0.83/1.02  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.83/1.02  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------