%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV949-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:24:30 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.85s 1.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.85s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 2 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 9 ~; 5 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 10 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 sgn 29 !; 0 ?; 11 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f369,axiom,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X6,X4,X5] :
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,X3,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(X3,X4,X5,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrtFAccNT_0) ).
fof(f379,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,v_U____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_wte_H_0) ).
fof(f402,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X0,X1),X2),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
fof(f429,axiom,
v_U____ = c_Type_Oty_ONT,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
fof(f430,plain,
c_Type_Oty_ONT = v_U____,
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f429]) ).
fof(f431,negated_conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X0)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X0),v_T____)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
fof(f439,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1,X6,X4,X5] :
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,X3,v_U____)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(X3,X4,X5,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X6) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f369,f430]) ).
tcf(c_419,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X0)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X0),v_T____)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f431]) ).
tcf(c_423,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X0,X1),X2),X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f402]) ).
tcf(c_458,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,v_U____),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f379]) ).
tcf(c_690,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i] :
( c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(X3,X4,X5,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X6)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,X3,v_U____) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f439]) ).
tcf(c_5147,plain,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAcc(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_423,c_419]) ).
tcf(c_5345,plain,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,v_U____),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_690,c_5147]) ).
tcf(c_5346,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5345,c_458]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV949-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.56 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.56 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.56 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.56 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.56 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.56 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.56 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.57 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 21:23:26 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.57 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.57 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.61 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.61 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.62
% 0.10/0.62 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.10/0.62
% 0.10/0.62 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.63 % Proving...
% 1.85/1.49 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.85/1.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ iProver source info
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.85/1.49 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.85/1.49 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ Proving...
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ Problem Properties
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 %
% 1.85/1.49 % clauses 168
% 1.85/1.49 % conjectures 1
% 1.85/1.49 % EPR 4
% 1.85/1.49 % Horn 164
% 1.85/1.49 % unary 113
% 1.85/1.49 % binary 46
% 1.85/1.49 % lits 246
% 1.85/1.49 % lits eq 184
% 1.85/1.49 % fd_pure 0
% 1.85/1.49 % fd_pseudo 0
% 1.85/1.49 % fd_cond 0
% 1.85/1.49 % fd_pseudo_cond 38
% 1.85/1.49 % AC symbols 0
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % ------
% 1.85/1.49 % Current options:
% 1.85/1.49 % ------
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 %
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % ------ Proving...
% 1.85/1.49 %
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.85/1.49
% 1.85/1.49
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------