%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV954-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:14 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 10 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 2 equ; 10 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 2 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 10 con; 0-7 aty)
% Number of variables : 28 ( 7 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,X1)
| v_thesis____ ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_11,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X7,X6,X5,X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__3(X5,X3,X6,X1,X7,X2,X4))
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__4(X3,X1,X2,X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_11) ).
cnf(cls_wt_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_ea____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_wt_0) ).
cnf(cls_void_0,axiom,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_void_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,X1)
| v_thesis____ ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_that_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X7,X6,X5,X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__3(X5,X3,X6,X1,X7,X2,X4))
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__4(X3,X1,X2,X4)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_ea____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
cls_wt_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
cls_void_0 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,X1)
| v_thesis____ ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X7,X6,X5,X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__3(X5,X3,X6,X1,X7,X2,X4))
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__8__4(X3,X1,X2,X4)) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_ea____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,X1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV954-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:37:36 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.56 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1149716 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.20/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.56 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.56 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.56 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 169s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 169s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 169s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 1149729 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.20/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.56 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.56 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.56 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 169s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.56 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.56 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.56 % Parsed axioms : 398
% 0.20/0.56 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Initial clauses : 398
% 0.20/0.56 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.20/0.56 % Initial clauses in saturation : 396
% 0.20/0.56 % Processed clauses : 1062
% 0.20/0.56 % ...of these trivial : 7
% 0.20/0.56 % ...subsumed : 294
% 0.20/0.56 % ...remaining for further processing : 761
% 0.20/0.56 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 10
% 0.20/0.56 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.20/0.56 % Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.20/0.56 % Generated clauses : 1341
% 0.20/0.56 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1131
% 0.20/0.56 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.20/0.56 % Paramodulations : 1292
% 0.20/0.56 % Factorizations : 8
% 0.20/0.56 % NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Equation resolutions : 41
% 0.20/0.56 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Total rewrite steps : 198
% 0.20/0.56 % ...of those cached : 85
% 0.20/0.56 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.56 % Current number of processed clauses : 433
% 0.20/0.56 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 73
% 0.20/0.56 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Negative unit clauses : 79
% 0.20/0.56 % Non-unit-clauses : 281
% 0.20/0.56 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 777
% 0.20/0.56 % ...number of literals in the above : 2206
% 0.20/0.56 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Current number of archived clauses : 329
% 0.20/0.56 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 74861
% 0.20/0.56 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36446
% 0.20/0.56 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 225
% 0.20/0.56 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4671
% 0.20/0.56 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % BW rewrite match attempts : 328
% 0.20/0.56 % BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 0.20/0.56 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Termbank termtop insertions : 102935
% 0.20/0.56 % Search garbage collected termcells : 961
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.56 % User time : 0.079 s
% 0.20/0.56 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.20/0.56 % Total time : 0.089 s
% 0.20/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 4484 pages
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.56 % User time : 0.382 s
% 0.20/0.56 % System time : 0.041 s
% 0.20/0.56 % Total time : 0.422 s
% 0.20/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.20/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------