%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV955-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:14 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 5.57s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 2 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 12 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 15 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_void_0,axiom,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_void_0) ).
cnf(cls_WTrtFAssNT_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrtFAssNT_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_02,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_02) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
cls_void_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrtFAssNT_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
cls_CHAINED_0_01 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,X1,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X1,X2,X3,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
cls_CHAINED_0_02 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV955-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.39 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:40:04 UTC 2026
% 0.16/5.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/5.40 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.47 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.57 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/5.57 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2803179 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.16/5.57 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/5.57 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/5.57 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.57 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting U----_206b_01_C11_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2803183 completed with status 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/5.57 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.57 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/5.57 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/5.57 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.57 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/5.57 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.57 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/5.57
% 0.16/5.57 % Proof found!
% 0.16/5.57 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/5.57 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/5.57 % Parsed axioms : 384
% 0.16/5.57 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Initial clauses : 384
% 0.16/5.57 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.16/5.57 % Initial clauses in saturation : 382
% 0.16/5.57 % Processed clauses : 364
% 0.16/5.57 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.16/5.57 % ...subsumed : 119
% 0.16/5.57 % ...remaining for further processing : 244
% 0.16/5.57 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Generated clauses : 163
% 0.16/5.57 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 106
% 0.16/5.57 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Paramodulations : 125
% 0.16/5.57 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Equation resolutions : 38
% 0.16/5.57 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.16/5.57 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.16/5.57 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.57 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.57 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.57 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.57 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.57 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.57 % Current number of processed clauses : 244
% 0.16/5.57 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.16/5.57 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Negative unit clauses : 112
% 0.16/5.57 % Non-unit-clauses : 118
% 0.16/5.57 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 124
% 0.16/5.57 % ...number of literals in the above : 361
% 0.16/5.57 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.16/5.57 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5277
% 0.16/5.57 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4421
% 0.16/5.57 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.16/5.57 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1553
% 0.16/5.57 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.16/5.57 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/5.57 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11094
% 0.16/5.57 % Search garbage collected termcells : 834
% 0.16/5.57
% 0.16/5.57 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.57 % User time : 0.037 s
% 0.16/5.57 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.16/5.57 % Total time : 0.047 s
% 0.16/5.57 % Maximum resident set size: 4156 pages
% 0.16/5.57
% 0.16/5.57 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.57 % User time : 0.081 s
% 0.16/5.57 % System time : 0.030 s
% 0.16/5.57 % Total time : 0.111 s
% 0.16/5.57 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.16/5.57 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------