%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV955-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:07:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.67s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 29 ( 2 equ; 16 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 12 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 37 ( 15 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_void_0,axiom,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_void_0) ).
cnf(cls_WTrtFAssNT_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrtFAssNT_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_02,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_02) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
cls_void_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrtFAssNT_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
cls_CHAINED_0_01 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,X1,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X1,X2,X3,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
cls_CHAINED_0_02 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWV955-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.58 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.58 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.58 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.58 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.58 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.58 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.58 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.58 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:34:26 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.58 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.58 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.62 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.62 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.67 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % sh5l with pid 1571500 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.67 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.67 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.67 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1571503 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.67 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.67 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.67 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.67 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.67
% 0.14/0.67 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.67 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.67 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.67 % Parsed axioms : 384
% 0.14/0.67 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 15
% 0.14/0.67 % Initial clauses : 369
% 0.14/0.67 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Initial clauses in saturation : 369
% 0.14/0.67 % Processed clauses : 353
% 0.14/0.67 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.14/0.67 % ...subsumed : 117
% 0.14/0.67 % ...remaining for further processing : 235
% 0.14/0.67 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Generated clauses : 189
% 0.14/0.67 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 137
% 0.14/0.67 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Paramodulations : 151
% 0.14/0.67 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Equation resolutions : 38
% 0.14/0.67 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.14/0.67 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.14/0.67 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.67 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.67 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.67 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.67 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.67 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.67 % Current number of processed clauses : 235
% 0.14/0.67 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.14/0.67 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Negative unit clauses : 112
% 0.14/0.67 % Non-unit-clauses : 110
% 0.14/0.67 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 153
% 0.14/0.67 % ...number of literals in the above : 436
% 0.14/0.67 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4193
% 0.14/0.67 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3439
% 0.14/0.67 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.14/0.67 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1532
% 0.14/0.67 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.14/0.67 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.67 % Termbank termtop insertions : 11682
% 0.14/0.67 % Search garbage collected termcells : 880
% 0.14/0.67
% 0.14/0.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.67 % User time : 0.019 s
% 0.14/0.67 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.67 % Total time : 0.022 s
% 0.14/0.67 % Maximum resident set size: 4360 pages
% 0.14/0.67
% 0.14/0.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.67 % User time : 0.028 s
% 0.14/0.67 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.67 % Total time : 0.037 s
% 0.14/0.67 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.67 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------