%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV958-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 9.80s 6.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 2 equ; 25 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-6 aty)
% Number of functors : 20 ( 20 usr; 13 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 51 ( 4 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_WTrtFAss_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_OClass(X10))
| ~ c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(X1,X10,X5,X9,X6,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X8),X9))
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrtFAss_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_sub_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),v_TF____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_sub_0) ).
cnf(cls_void_0,axiom,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_void_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_03,axiom,
c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(v_P,v_C_H____,v_F____,v_TF____,v_D____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_03) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_04,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_C_H____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_04) ).
cnf(cls_wt_092_060_094isub_0622_H_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_wt_092_060_094isub_0622_H_0) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_OClass(X10))
| ~ c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(X1,X10,X5,X9,X6,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X8),X9))
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrtFAss_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_OClass(X10))
| ~ c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(X1,X10,X5,X9,X6,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X7,X8)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X8),X9))
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X4,X5,X6,X7,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),v_TF____)),
cls_sub_0 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
cls_void_0 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,X1,X2,X6,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,X1,X2,X3,c_Type_Oty_OClass(X7))
| ~ c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(v_P,X7,X4,v_TF____,X5,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar))))
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,X1,X2,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X3,X4,X5,X6,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
c_TypeRel_Ohas__field(v_P,v_C_H____,v_F____,v_TF____,v_D____,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),
cls_CHAINED_0_03 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(v_e_Ha____,v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,X1,X2,X4,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,X1,X2,X3,c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_C_H____))
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,X1,X2,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X3,v_F____,v_D____,X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_OClass(v_C_H____)),
cls_CHAINED_0_04 ).
cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____),
cls_wt_092_060_094isub_0622_H_0 ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV958-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.37 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/5.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:35:22 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/5.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.80/6.95 % Version: 3.5.1
% 9.80/6.95 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.80/6.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2598791 completed with status 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 9.80/6.95 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.80/6.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.80/6.95 % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.80/6.95 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 9.80/6.95 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting U----_206b_01_C11_23_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting G-E--_208_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S070I with 136s (1) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2598796 completed with status 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 9.80/6.95 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.80/6.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.80/6.95 % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.80/6.95 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 9.80/6.95 % Scheduled 11 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 9.80/6.95 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 9.80/6.95 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.80/6.95
% 9.80/6.95 % Proof found!
% 9.80/6.95 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 9.80/6.95 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.80/6.95 % Parsed axioms : 393
% 9.80/6.95 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Initial clauses : 393
% 9.80/6.95 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 9.80/6.95 % Initial clauses in saturation : 391
% 9.80/6.95 % Processed clauses : 2473
% 9.80/6.95 % ...of these trivial : 3
% 9.80/6.95 % ...subsumed : 1041
% 9.80/6.95 % ...remaining for further processing : 1429
% 9.80/6.95 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Backward-subsumed : 10
% 9.80/6.95 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Generated clauses : 35281
% 9.80/6.95 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 34859
% 9.80/6.95 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Paramodulations : 35243
% 9.80/6.95 % Factorizations : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % NegExts : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Equation resolutions : 38
% 9.80/6.95 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Total rewrite steps : 5568
% 9.80/6.95 % ...of those cached : 5278
% 9.80/6.95 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Propositional check models : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 9.80/6.95 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 9.80/6.95 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 9.80/6.95 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 9.80/6.95 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 9.80/6.95 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 9.80/6.95 % Current number of processed clauses : 1148
% 9.80/6.95 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 80
% 9.80/6.95 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 24
% 9.80/6.95 % Negative unit clauses : 116
% 9.80/6.95 % Non-unit-clauses : 928
% 9.80/6.95 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33023
% 9.80/6.95 % ...number of literals in the above : 82029
% 9.80/6.95 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Current number of archived clauses : 282
% 9.80/6.95 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 281106
% 9.80/6.95 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 180739
% 9.80/6.95 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 931
% 9.80/6.95 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4510
% 9.80/6.95 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2227
% 9.80/6.95 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Condensation successes : 0
% 9.80/6.95 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1265517
% 9.80/6.95 % Search garbage collected termcells : 834
% 9.80/6.95
% 9.80/6.95 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.80/6.95 % User time : 1.321 s
% 9.80/6.95 % System time : 0.061 s
% 9.80/6.95 % Total time : 1.382 s
% 9.80/6.95 % Maximum resident set size: 4160 pages
% 9.80/6.95
% 9.80/6.95 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.80/6.95 % User time : 6.658 s
% 9.80/6.95 % System time : 0.291 s
% 9.80/6.95 % Total time : 6.949 s
% 9.80/6.95 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 9.80/6.95 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------