%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV961-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 0.62s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR)
% Number of literals : 19 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 2 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 6 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_that_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
| v_thesis____ ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_that_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_1,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_1) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
| v_thesis____ ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_that_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
| v_thesis____ ),
c_0_4 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ v_thesis____,
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)),
cls_CHAINED_1 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_10])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV961-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:39:22 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.62 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2133353 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.25/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.62 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.62 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.62 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 169s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting new_bool_3 with 169s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting new_bool_1 with 169s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2133359 completed with status 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.62 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.62 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.25/0.62 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.25/0.62 % Search class: FGUSM-FSLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.62 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.25/0.62 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.62 % Preprocessing time : 0.008 s
% 0.25/0.62
% 0.25/0.62 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.62 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.25/0.62 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.62 % Parsed axioms : 546
% 0.25/0.62 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Initial clauses : 546
% 0.25/0.62 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.25/0.62 % Initial clauses in saturation : 544
% 0.25/0.62 % Processed clauses : 682
% 0.25/0.62 % ...of these trivial : 10
% 0.25/0.62 % ...subsumed : 243
% 0.25/0.62 % ...remaining for further processing : 429
% 0.25/0.62 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4
% 0.25/0.62 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.25/0.62 % Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.25/0.62 % Generated clauses : 920
% 0.25/0.62 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 632
% 0.25/0.62 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Paramodulations : 874
% 0.25/0.62 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Equation resolutions : 46
% 0.25/0.62 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Total rewrite steps : 288
% 0.25/0.62 % ...of those cached : 164
% 0.25/0.62 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.62 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.62 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.62 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.62 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.62 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.62 % Current number of processed clauses : 419
% 0.25/0.62 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 116
% 0.25/0.62 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Negative unit clauses : 101
% 0.25/0.62 % Non-unit-clauses : 202
% 0.25/0.62 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 478
% 0.25/0.62 % ...number of literals in the above : 1177
% 0.25/0.62 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Current number of archived clauses : 11
% 0.25/0.62 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29594
% 0.25/0.62 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19862
% 0.25/0.62 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 142
% 0.25/0.62 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5493
% 0.25/0.62 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % BW rewrite match attempts : 340
% 0.25/0.62 % BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.25/0.62 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.62 % Termbank termtop insertions : 62437
% 0.25/0.62 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1286
% 0.25/0.62
% 0.25/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.62 % User time : 0.057 s
% 0.25/0.62 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.25/0.62 % Total time : 0.067 s
% 0.25/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 4848 pages
% 0.25/0.62
% 0.25/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.62 % User time : 0.253 s
% 0.25/0.62 % System time : 0.038 s
% 0.25/0.62 % Total time : 0.291 s
% 0.25/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 5376 pages
% 0.25/0.62 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------