↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWV961-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:45:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.75s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    7 (   5 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   0 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   7 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(538,axiom,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),u),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,u)
    | v_thesis____ ),
    file('SWV961-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(542,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____)),
    file('SWV961-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(543,axiom,
    c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),
    file('SWV961-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(546,axiom,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    file('SWV961-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(549,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),u),v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____))
    | ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,u) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[538,546]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:538.2,546.0')] ).

cnf(556,plain,
    ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_sko__CHAINED__1(v_E____,v_P,v_T_092_060_094isub_0622____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,v_h_Ha____)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[542,549]),
    [iquote('0:Res:542.0,549.0')] ).

cnf(558,plain,
    $false,
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[556,543]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:556.0,543.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWV961-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jun 15 00:24:51 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.56/0.75  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.56/0.75  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.56/0.75  SPASS derived 3 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 430 clauses.
% 0.56/0.75  SPASS allocated 77677 KBytes.
% 0.56/0.75  SPASS spent	0:00:00.40 on the problem.
% 0.56/0.75  		0:00:00.07 for the input.
% 0.56/0.75  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.56/0.75  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.56/0.75  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.56/0.75  		0:00:00.24 for the reduction.
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  
% 0.56/0.75  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 7 :
% 0.56/0.75  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.56/0.75  Formulae used in the proof : cls_that_0 cls_CHAINED_1 cls_CHAINED_0 cls_conjecture_0
% 0.56/0.75  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------