%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV962-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:15 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 8 unt; 1 nHn; 13 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 5 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 19 ( 19 usr; 12 con; 0-5 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 25 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X3,X4,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X5,X6,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid
| X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_wt_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_wt_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X3,X4,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X5,X6,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I8_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X3,X4,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X5,X6,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| X1 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
cls_wt_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
v_T____ = c_Type_Oty_OVoid,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV962-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.41 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:34:27 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.42 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/0.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.57/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.63 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.63 % new_bool_3 with pid 2529592 completed with status 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.57/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.63 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.57/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.57/0.63 % Search class: FGHSS-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.63 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.57/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.63 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2529595 completed with status 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.57/0.63 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.57/0.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.57/0.63 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.57/0.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.57/0.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.57/0.63 % Search class: FGHSS-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.63 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FFLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.57/0.63 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.57/0.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.57/0.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 % Proof found!
% 0.57/0.63 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.57/0.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.63 % Parsed axioms : 407
% 0.57/0.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 113
% 0.57/0.63 % Initial clauses : 294
% 0.57/0.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 294
% 0.57/0.63 % Processed clauses : 308
% 0.57/0.63 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % ...subsumed : 114
% 0.57/0.63 % ...remaining for further processing : 194
% 0.57/0.63 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.57/0.63 % Generated clauses : 120
% 0.57/0.63 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 80
% 0.57/0.63 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Paramodulations : 84
% 0.57/0.63 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % NegExts : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Equation resolutions : 36
% 0.57/0.63 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Total rewrite steps : 6
% 0.57/0.63 % ...of those cached : 2
% 0.57/0.63 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.63 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.63 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.63 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.63 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.63 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.57/0.63 % Current number of processed clauses : 193
% 0.57/0.63 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.57/0.63 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Negative unit clauses : 111
% 0.57/0.63 % Non-unit-clauses : 70
% 0.57/0.63 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 66
% 0.57/0.63 % ...number of literals in the above : 232
% 0.57/0.63 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.57/0.63 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1605
% 0.57/0.63 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1009
% 0.57/0.63 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.57/0.63 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1048
% 0.57/0.63 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % BW rewrite match attempts : 9
% 0.57/0.63 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.57/0.63 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.57/0.63 % Termbank termtop insertions : 8660
% 0.57/0.63 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1269
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.57/0.63 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.57/0.63 % Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.57/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4172 pages
% 0.57/0.63
% 0.57/0.63 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.57/0.63 % User time : 0.043 s
% 0.57/0.63 % System time : 0.018 s
% 0.57/0.63 % Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.57/0.63 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.57/0.63 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------