%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SWV962-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:24:32 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.26s 6.52s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.26s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named f495ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_6334ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f480,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_wt_0) ).
fof(f489,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X0,X1),X2),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
fof(f491,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
fof(f492,negated_conjecture,
! [X0] :
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X0)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X0),v_T____)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
tcf(c_456,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X0),v_T____))
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f492]) ).
tcf(c_459,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X0,X1),X2),X2)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f489]) ).
tcf(c_490,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622_H____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f491]) ).
tcf(c_493,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_F____,v_D____,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f480]) ).
tcf(c_667,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i,X7: $i] :
( ( X7 = c_Type_Oty_OVoid )
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X0,X1,X2,c_Expr_Oexp_OFAss(X3,X4,X5,X6,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X7) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f495]) ).
tcf(c_6233,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),v_T____)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_490,c_456]) ).
tcf(c_6326,plain,
c_Type_Oty_OVoid = v_T____,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_493,c_667]) ).
tcf(c_6330,plain,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),c_Type_Oty_OVoid),c_Type_Oty_OVoid)),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_6233,c_6326]) ).
tcf(c_6334,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6330,c_459]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV962-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/5.59 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.59 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.59 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.59 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.59 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.59 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.59 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.59 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 21:24:54 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.59 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.59 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.17/5.63 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/5.63 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/5.64
% 0.17/5.64 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.17/5.64
% 0.17/5.64 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.17/5.66 % Proving...
% 4.26/6.52 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/6.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ iProver source info
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.26/6.52 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.26/6.52 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 12 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 2 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ Proving...
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ Problem Properties
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 %
% 4.26/6.52 % clauses 184
% 4.26/6.52 % conjectures 1
% 4.26/6.52 % EPR 7
% 4.26/6.52 % Horn 172
% 4.26/6.52 % unary 122
% 4.26/6.52 % binary 41
% 4.26/6.52 % lits 285
% 4.26/6.52 % lits eq 184
% 4.26/6.52 % fd_pure 0
% 4.26/6.52 % fd_pseudo 0
% 4.26/6.52 % fd_cond 1
% 4.26/6.52 % fd_pseudo_cond 36
% 4.26/6.52 % AC symbols 0
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % ------
% 4.26/6.52 % Current options:
% 4.26/6.52 % ------
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 %
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % ------ Proving...
% 4.26/6.52 %
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.26/6.52
% 4.26/6.52
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------