%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV966-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:16 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.17s 0.47s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 9 RR)
% Number of literals : 25 ( 0 equ; 14 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 10 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 36 ( 15 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,v_M____,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_WTrtCallNT_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(X1,X2,X3,X6,X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(X4,X5,X6,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrtCallNT_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_esa____,v_Ts____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0) ).
cnf(cls_CHAINED_0_01,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_CHAINED_0_01) ).
cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,v_M____,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(X1,X2,X3,X6,X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(X4,X5,X6,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X7) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrtCallNT_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,v_M____,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
c_0_5 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(X1,X2,X3,X6,X8)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(X4,X5,X6,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X7) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrts(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_esa____,v_Ts____),
cls_CHAINED_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(v_e_Ha____,v_M____,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,X1,c_Type_Oty_ONT)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(X1,X2,v_esa____,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,c_Type_Oty_ONT),
cls_CHAINED_0_01 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWV966-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:35:24 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.47 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % sh5l with pid 682362 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.17/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.17/0.47 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/0.47 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLS33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.47 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % SubtermCWHack with pid 682367 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/0.47 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.47 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.17/0.47 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/0.47 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLS33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.47 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.17/0.47 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.47 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.47 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.17/0.47 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.47 % Parsed axioms : 339
% 0.17/0.47 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 8
% 0.17/0.47 % Initial clauses : 331
% 0.17/0.47 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Initial clauses in saturation : 331
% 0.17/0.47 % Processed clauses : 331
% 0.17/0.47 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % ...subsumed : 114
% 0.17/0.47 % ...remaining for further processing : 217
% 0.17/0.47 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Generated clauses : 101
% 0.17/0.47 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 49
% 0.17/0.47 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Paramodulations : 64
% 0.17/0.47 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Equation resolutions : 37
% 0.17/0.47 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.17/0.47 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.17/0.47 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.47 % Current number of processed clauses : 217
% 0.17/0.47 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.17/0.47 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Negative unit clauses : 107
% 0.17/0.47 % Non-unit-clauses : 97
% 0.17/0.47 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 49
% 0.17/0.47 % ...number of literals in the above : 142
% 0.17/0.47 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3586
% 0.17/0.47 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3271
% 0.17/0.47 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.17/0.47 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 860
% 0.17/0.47 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.17/0.47 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.47 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7888
% 0.17/0.47 % Search garbage collected termcells : 787
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47 % User time : 0.016 s
% 0.17/0.47 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.17/0.47 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.17/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4360 pages
% 0.17/0.47
% 0.17/0.47 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.47 % User time : 0.024 s
% 0.17/0.47 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.17/0.47 % Total time : 0.033 s
% 0.17/0.47 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.17/0.47 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------