%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWV969-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 20 21:40:47 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.04s 300.20s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.14 % Problem : SWV969-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Jun 16 01:02:56 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.40 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.15/0.40 The process was started by sandbox2 on n003.cluster.edu,
% 0.15/0.40 Thu Jun 16 01:02:56 2022
% 0.15/0.40 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 4892.
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.15/0.40 set(auto).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.15/0.40 clear(print_given).
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 list(usable).
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.15/0.40 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.15/0.40 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.15/0.40 clauses in usable.
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.15/0.40 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 ------------> process usable:
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_List_Olist__all2(A,c_List_Olist_OCons(B,C,D),c_List_Olist_OCons(E,F,G),D,G)| -c_List_Olist__all2(A,C,F,D,G)| -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(A,B),E)).
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_List_Olist__all2(A,c_List_Olist_OCons(B,C,D),c_List_Olist_OCons(E,F,G),D,G)| -c_List_Olist__all2(A,C,F,D,G)| -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(A,B),E)).
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_Type_Oty_OClass(A)!=c_Type_Oty_ONT.
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 55 during input processing: 0 [flip.1] {-} c_List_Olist_OCons(B,A,C)!=A.
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 32 during input processing: 0 [] {-} c_List_Olist__all2(c_TypeRel_Owiden(A,B),c_List_Olist_OCons(C,D,tc_Type_Oty),c_List_Olist_OCons(E,F,tc_Type_Oty),tc_Type_Oty,tc_Type_Oty)| -c_List_Olist__all2(c_TypeRel_Owiden(A,B),D,F,tc_Type_Oty,tc_Type_Oty)| -hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(A,B),C),E)).
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [copy,11,flip.1] {-} c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(A,B)!=c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(C,D,E,B).
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 48 during input processing: 0 [copy,36,flip.1] {-} c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(A,B)!=c_Expr_Oexp_OCast(C,D,B).
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 56 during input processing: 0 [copy,44,flip.1] {-} c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(A,B,C,D)!=c_Expr_Oexp_OCast(E,F,D).
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [copy,48,flip.1] {-} c_Expr_Oexp_OCast(A,B,C)!=c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(D,C).
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [copy,50,flip.1] {-} c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(A,B,C,D)!=c_Expr_Oexp_Onew(E,D).
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 44 during input processing: 0 [copy,56,flip.1] {-} c_Expr_Oexp_OCast(A,B,C)!=c_Expr_Oexp_OCall(D,E,F,C).
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 ------------> process sos:
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 111 during input processing: 0 [demod,108] {-} c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_h_Ha____,v_E____,v_e_Ha____,v_U____).
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 118 during input processing: 0 [copy,114,flip.1] {-} v_P=v_P.
% 0.15/0.40 Following clause subsumed by 118 during input processing: 0 [copy,118,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.15/0.40 118 back subsumes 114.
% 0.15/0.40 118 back subsumes 91.
% 0.15/0.40 118 back subsumes 90.
% 0.15/0.40 118 back subsumes 89.
% 0.15/0.40 118 back subsumes 88.
% 0.15/0.40 118 back subsumes 87.
% 0.15/0.40
% 0.15/0.40 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.22/0.45 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.22/0.45 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.22/0.45 number of clauses in intial UL: 80
% 0.22/0.45 number of clauses initially in problem: 104
% 0.22/0.45 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 76
% 0.22/0.45 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 78
% 0.22/0.45 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 98
% 0.22/0.45 absolute distinct symbol count: 71
% 0.22/0.45 distinct predicate count: 14
% 0.22/0.45 distinct function count: 28
% 0.22/0.45 distinct constant count: 29
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.89/1.14
% 0.89/1.14
% 0.89/1.14 Changing weight limit from 60 to 43.
% 0.89/1.14
% 0.89/1.14 Resetting weight limit to 43 after 40 givens.
% 0.89/1.14
% 1.28/1.50
% 1.28/1.50
% 1.28/1.50 Changing weight limit from 43 to 34.
% 1.28/1.50
% 1.28/1.50 Resetting weight limit to 34 after 45 givens.
% 1.28/1.50
% 1.51/1.70
% 1.51/1.70
% 1.51/1.70 Changing weight limit from 34 to 33.
% 1.51/1.70
% 1.51/1.70 Resetting weight limit to 33 after 50 givens.
% 1.51/1.70
% 1.67/1.89
% 1.67/1.89
% 1.67/1.89 Changing weight limit from 33 to 32.
% 1.67/1.89
% 1.67/1.89 Resetting weight limit to 32 after 55 givens.
% 1.67/1.89
% 1.79/2.02
% 1.79/2.02
% 1.79/2.02 Changing weight limit from 32 to 30.
% 1.79/2.02
% 1.79/2.02 Resetting weight limit to 30 after 60 givens.
% 1.79/2.02
% 2.11/2.30
% 2.11/2.30
% 2.11/2.30 Changing weight limit from 30 to 27.
% 2.11/2.30
% 2.11/2.30 Resetting weight limit to 27 after 65 givens.
% 2.11/2.30
% 2.26/2.45
% 2.26/2.45
% 2.26/2.45 Changing weight limit from 27 to 26.
% 2.26/2.45
% 2.26/2.45 Resetting weight limit to 26 after 70 givens.
% 2.26/2.45
% 2.32/2.54
% 2.32/2.54
% 2.32/2.54 Changing weight limit from 26 to 25.
% 2.32/2.54
% 2.32/2.54 Resetting weight limit to 25 after 75 givens.
% 2.32/2.54
% 2.82/3.00
% 2.82/3.00
% 2.82/3.00 Changing weight limit from 25 to 24.
% 2.82/3.00
% 2.82/3.00 Resetting weight limit to 24 after 80 givens.
% 2.82/3.00
% 3.01/3.22
% 3.01/3.22
% 3.01/3.22 Changing weight limit from 24 to 22.
% 3.01/3.22
% 3.01/3.22 Resetting weight limit to 22 after 85 givens.
% 3.01/3.22
% 3.14/3.33
% 3.14/3.33
% 3.14/3.33 Changing weight limit from 22 to 21.
% 3.14/3.33
% 3.14/3.33 Resetting weight limit to 21 after 90 givens.
% 3.14/3.33
% 3.15/3.38
% 3.15/3.38
% 3.15/3.38 Changing weight limit from 21 to 20.
% 3.15/3.38
% 3.15/3.38 Resetting weight limit to 20 after 95 givens.
% 3.15/3.38
% 3.41/3.66
% 3.41/3.66
% 3.41/3.66 Changing weight limit from 20 to 19.
% 3.41/3.66
% 3.41/3.66 Resetting weight limit to 19 after 110 givens.
% 3.41/3.66
% 3.64/3.88
% 3.64/3.88
% 3.64/3.88 Changing weight limit from 19 to 18.
% 3.64/3.88
% 3.64/3.88 Resetting weight limit to 18 after 120 givens.
% 3.64/3.88
% 4.09/4.28
% 4.09/4.28
% 4.09/4.28 Changing weight limit from 18 to 17.
% 4.09/4.28
% 4.09/4.28 Resetting weight limit to 17 after 140 givens.
% 4.09/4.28
% 5.76/5.99
% 5.76/5.99
% 5.76/5.99 Changing weight limit from 17 to 16.
% 5.76/5.99
% 5.76/5.99 Resetting weight limit to 16 after 230 givens.
% 5.76/5.99
% 9.01/9.19
% 9.01/9.19
% 9.01/9.19 Changing weight limit from 16 to 15.
% 9.01/9.19
% 9.01/9.19 Modelling stopped after 300 given clauses and 0.00 seconds
% 9.01/9.19
% 9.01/9.19
% 9.01/9.19 Resetting weight limit to 15 after 540 givens.
% 9.01/9.19
% 300.04/300.20 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------