↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.SAT-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : SWV973-10 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr  9 09:31:59 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Satisfiable 3.16s 1.96s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14  % Problem  : SWV973-10 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.04/0.15  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.37  % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.37  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.37  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.37  % DateTime : Wed Apr  9 05:03:29 EDT 2025
% 0.14/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 3.16/1.96  
% 3.16/1.96  % SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.16/1.96  
% 3.16/1.96  % SZS output start Saturation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.25/1.97  %$ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt > ifeq2 > ifeq > c_Expr_Oexp_OVal > #nlpp > tc_List_Olist > c_Value_Oval_OIntg > c_Value_Oval_OAddr > v_v____ > v_ha____ > v_P > v_E____ > true > tc_String_Ochar > c_Value_Oval_OUnit > c_Value_Oval_ONull > c_Type_Oty_ONT > b > a
% 3.25/1.97  
% 3.25/1.97  %Foreground sorts:
% 3.25/1.97  
% 3.25/1.97  
% 3.25/1.97  %Background operators:
% 3.25/1.97  
% 3.25/1.97  
% 3.25/1.97  %Foreground operators:
% 3.25/1.97  tff(a, type, a: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(v_P, type, v_P: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(c_Value_Oval_OAddr, type, c_Value_Oval_OAddr: $i > $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(v_ha____, type, v_ha____: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(c_Type_Oty_ONT, type, c_Type_Oty_ONT: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(ifeq2, type, ifeq2: ($i * $i * $i * $i) > $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(b, type, b: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(tc_List_Olist, type, tc_List_Olist: $i > $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt, type, c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt: ($i * $i * $i * $i * $i) > $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(c_Value_Oval_OIntg, type, c_Value_Oval_OIntg: $i > $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(c_Value_Oval_ONull, type, c_Value_Oval_ONull: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(v_v____, type, v_v____: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(c_Value_Oval_OUnit, type, c_Value_Oval_OUnit: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal, type, c_Expr_Oexp_OVal: ($i * $i) > $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(true, type, true: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(tc_String_Ochar, type, tc_String_Ochar: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(v_E____, type, v_E____: $i).
% 3.25/1.97  tff(ifeq, type, ifeq: ($i * $i * $i * $i) > $i).
% 3.25/1.97  
% 3.25/1.97  %Saturated clause set:
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_10, plain, (c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P, v_ha____, v_E____, c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(v_v____, tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)), c_Type_Oty_ONT)=true)).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_14, plain, (![V_int_12, V_nat_H_13]: (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_OIntg(V_int_12), c_Value_Oval_OAddr(V_nat_H_13), a, b)=b))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_8, plain, (![V_int_9, V_int_H_10]: (ifeq2(c_Value_Oval_OIntg(V_int_9), c_Value_Oval_OIntg(V_int_H_10), V_int_9, V_int_H_10)=V_int_H_10))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_16, plain, (![V_nat_H_14, V_int_15]: (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(V_nat_H_14), c_Value_Oval_OIntg(V_int_15), a, b)=b))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_6, plain, (![V_nat_7, V_nat_H_8]: (ifeq2(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(V_nat_7), c_Value_Oval_OAddr(V_nat_H_8), V_nat_7, V_nat_H_8)=V_nat_H_8))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_32, plain, (![V_nat_H_21]: (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(V_nat_H_21), c_Value_Oval_ONull, a, b)=b))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_34, plain, (![V_nat_H_22]: (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_ONull, c_Value_Oval_OAddr(V_nat_H_22), a, b)=b))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_22, plain, (![V_int_H_18]: (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_OIntg(V_int_H_18), c_Value_Oval_OUnit, a, b)=b))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_26, plain, (![V_int_H_19]: (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_OIntg(V_int_H_19), c_Value_Oval_ONull, a, b)=b))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_18, plain, (![V_nat_H_16]: (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(V_nat_H_16), c_Value_Oval_OUnit, a, b)=b))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_30, plain, (![V_int_H_20]: (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_ONull, c_Value_Oval_OIntg(V_int_H_20), a, b)=b))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_12, plain, (![V_nat_H_11]: (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_OUnit, c_Value_Oval_OAddr(V_nat_H_11), a, b)=b))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_20, plain, (![V_int_H_17]: (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_OUnit, c_Value_Oval_OIntg(V_int_H_17), a, b)=b))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_28, plain, (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_OUnit, c_Value_Oval_ONull, a, b)=b)).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_4, plain, (![A_4, B_5, C_6]: (ifeq(A_4, A_4, B_5, C_6)=B_5))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_24, plain, (ifeq(c_Value_Oval_ONull, c_Value_Oval_OUnit, a, b)=b)).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_36, plain, (ifeq(v_v____, c_Value_Oval_ONull, a, b)=b)).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_2, plain, (![A_1, B_2, C_3]: (ifeq2(A_1, A_1, B_2, C_3)=B_2))).
% 3.25/1.98  tff(c_38, plain, (b!=a)).
% 3.25/1.98  % SZS output end Saturation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.25/1.98  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------