%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWV982-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:00:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.33s 0.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.33s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 10 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR)
% Number of literals : 43 ( 0 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-5 aty)
% Number of functors : 20 ( 20 usr; 9 con; 0-8 aty)
% Number of variables : 83 ( 15 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I5_J_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OTryCatch(X4,X5,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X6)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__5__1(X5,X3,X1,X6,X7,X4,X8,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I5_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I4_J_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__4__1(X3,X1,X4,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I4_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_RedTryFail_I4_J_0,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_a______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OTryCatch(c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_C______,v_V______,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_RedTryFail_I4_J_0) ).
cnf(cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I4_J_1,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X4,X1,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(X3,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5)
| c_Type_Ois__refT(c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__4__1(X1,X2,X3,X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I4_J_1) ).
cnf(cls_WTrtThrow_0,axiom,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,X6)
| ~ c_Type_Ois__refT(X6)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_WTrtThrow_0) ).
cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_a______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_conjecture_0) ).
cnf(cls_widen__refl_0,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cls_widen__refl_0) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OTryCatch(X4,X5,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X6)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__5__1(X5,X3,X1,X6,X7,X4,X8,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I5_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__4__1(X3,X1,X4,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I4_J_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_OTryCatch(X4,X5,X7,X8,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X6)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__5__1(X5,X3,X1,X6,X7,X4,X8,X2)) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_a______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OTryCatch(c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_C______,v_V______,v_e_092_060_094isub_0622______,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_T____),
cls_RedTryFail_I4_J_0 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X4,X1,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(X3,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5)
| c_Type_Ois__refT(c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__4__1(X1,X2,X3,X4)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrt__elim__cases_I4_J_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,X6)
| ~ c_Type_Ois__refT(X6)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_WTrtThrow_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__4__1(X3,X1,X4,X2)) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_a______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__5__1(v_C______,v_E____,v_P,v_T____,v_V______,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_e_092_060_094isub_0622______,v_a______)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X2,X4,X1,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(X3,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5)
| c_Type_Ois__refT(c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__4__1(X1,X2,X3,X4)) ),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_a______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cls_conjecture_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,X4,X6)
| ~ c_Type_Ois__refT(X6)
| c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(X1,X2,X3,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(X4,tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X5) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_a______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__4__1(v_E____,v_P,c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_a______)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
c_Type_Ois__refT(c_WellTypeRT_Osko__WellTypeRT__XWTrt__elim__cases__4__1(v_E____,v_P,c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),v_a______)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_a______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1)
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,v_a______,v_E____,c_Expr_Oexp_Othrow(c_Expr_Oexp_OVal(c_Value_Oval_OAddr(v_aa______),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),X1),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(v_P,tc_prod(tc_List_Olist(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)),tc_Expr_Oexp(tc_List_Olist(tc_String_Ochar)))),X1),v_T____)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,axiom,
hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_TypeRel_Owiden(X1,X2),X3),X3)),
cls_widen__refl_0 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWV982-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.44 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:35:40 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.27/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.27/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.33/0.73 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.33/0.73 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1573506 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.33/0.73 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.33/0.73 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.33/0.73 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLS33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.73 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 226s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting new_bool_3 with 226s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting new_bool_1 with 226s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % new_bool_1 with pid 1573517 completed with status 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.33/0.73 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.33/0.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.33/0.73 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.33/0.73 % Search class: FGHSM-FSLS33-DFFFFFNN
% 0.33/0.73 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 226s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting new_bool_3 with 226s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Starting new_bool_1 with 226s (1) cores
% 0.33/0.73 % Preprocessing time : 0.009 s
% 0.33/0.73 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.33/0.73
% 0.33/0.73 % Proof found!
% 0.33/0.73 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.33/0.73 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.33/0.73 % Parsed axioms : 429
% 0.33/0.73 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Initial clauses : 429
% 0.33/0.73 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.33/0.73 % Initial clauses in saturation : 427
% 0.33/0.73 % Processed clauses : 778
% 0.33/0.73 % ...of these trivial : 10
% 0.33/0.73 % ...subsumed : 158
% 0.33/0.73 % ...remaining for further processing : 610
% 0.33/0.73 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.33/0.73 % Generated clauses : 498
% 0.33/0.73 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 303
% 0.33/0.73 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Paramodulations : 455
% 0.33/0.73 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % NegExts : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Equation resolutions : 43
% 0.33/0.73 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Total rewrite steps : 198
% 0.33/0.73 % ...of those cached : 92
% 0.33/0.73 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.73 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.73 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.73 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.73 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.73 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.33/0.73 % Current number of processed clauses : 293
% 0.33/0.73 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 80
% 0.33/0.73 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Negative unit clauses : 114
% 0.33/0.73 % Non-unit-clauses : 99
% 0.33/0.73 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 201
% 0.33/0.73 % ...number of literals in the above : 280
% 0.33/0.73 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Current number of archived clauses : 318
% 0.33/0.73 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 16789
% 0.33/0.73 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8178
% 0.33/0.73 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.33/0.73 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6509
% 0.33/0.73 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % BW rewrite match attempts : 265
% 0.33/0.73 % BW rewrite match successes : 8
% 0.33/0.73 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.33/0.73 % Termbank termtop insertions : 17408
% 0.33/0.73 % Search garbage collected termcells : 885
% 0.33/0.73
% 0.33/0.73 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.73 % User time : 0.082 s
% 0.33/0.73 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.33/0.73 % Total time : 0.095 s
% 0.33/0.73 % Maximum resident set size: 4444 pages
% 0.33/0.73
% 0.33/0.73 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.33/0.73 % User time : 0.325 s
% 0.33/0.73 % System time : 0.048 s
% 0.33/0.73 % Total time : 0.373 s
% 0.33/0.73 % Maximum resident set size: 5120 pages
% 0.33/0.73 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------