%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : SWV985-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n023.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Mon Jun 24 16:49:05 EDT 2024 % Result : Unsatisfiable 0.53s 0.58s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.53s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWV985-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0. % 0.11/0.12 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu % 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Thu Jun 20 14:20:24 EDT 2024 % 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark % 0.19/0.58 %------------------------------------------- % 0.19/0.58 % File :CSE---1.7 % 0.19/0.58 % Problem :theBenchmark % 0.19/0.58 % Transform :cnf % 0.19/0.58 % Format :tptp:raw % 0.19/0.58 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.19/0.58 % 0.19/0.58 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s % 0.19/0.58 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s % 0.19/0.58 %------------------------------------------- % 0.19/0.58 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.19/0.58 % File : SWV985-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.1.0. % 0.19/0.58 % Domain : Software Verification % 0.19/0.58 % Problem : Java type soundness 555_24 % 0.19/0.58 % Version : Especial. % 0.19/0.58 % English : % 0.19/0.58 % 0.19/0.58 % Refs : [vON99] von Oheimb & Nipkow (1999), Machine-Checking the Java % 0.19/0.58 % : [Nip10] Nipkow (2010), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe % 0.19/0.58 % : [BN10] Boehme & Nipkow (2010), Sledgehammer: Judgement Day % 0.19/0.58 % Source : [Nip10] % 0.19/0.58 % Names : TypeSafe-555_24 [Nip10] % 0.19/0.58 % 0.19/0.58 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 0.19/0.58 % Rating : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.08 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.14 v4.1.0 % 0.19/0.58 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR) % 0.19/0.58 % Number of literals : 8 ( 3 equ; 2 neg) % 0.19/0.58 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.19/0.58 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 0.19/0.58 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 0 prp; 2-5 aty) % 0.19/0.58 % Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty) % 0.19/0.58 % Number of variables : 7 ( 3 sgn) % 0.19/0.58 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN % 0.19/0.58 % 0.19/0.58 % Comments : % 0.19/0.58 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.19/0.58 cnf(cls_COMBI__def_0,axiom, % 0.19/0.58 c_COMBI(V_P,T_a) = V_P ). % 0.19/0.58 % 0.19/0.58 cnf(cls_refl_I2_J_0,axiom, % 0.53/0.58 c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf(v_P,v_E,v_s_H) ). % 0.53/0.58 % 0.53/0.58 cnf(cls_refl_I1_J_0,axiom, % 0.53/0.58 c_WellTypeRT_OWTrt(v_P,c_State_Ohp(v_s_H),v_E,v_e_H,v_T____) ). % 0.53/0.58 % 0.53/0.58 cnf(cls_COMBI__def__raw_0,axiom, % 0.53/0.58 c_COMBI(v_P,t_a) = v_P ). % 0.53/0.58 % 0.53/0.58 cnf(cls_conjecture_0,negated_conjecture, % 0.53/0.58 ~ c_TypeSafe__Mirabelle_Osconf(v_P,v_E,v_s_H) ). % 0.53/0.58 % 0.53/0.58 cnf(cls_ATP__Linkup_Oequal__imp__fequal_0,axiom, % 0.53/0.58 c_fequal(V_x,V_x,T_a) ). % 0.53/0.58 % 0.53/0.58 cnf(cls_ATP__Linkup_Ofequal__imp__equal_0,axiom, % 0.53/0.58 ( V_X = V_Y % 0.53/0.58 | ~ c_fequal(V_X,V_Y,T_a) ) ). % 0.53/0.58 % 0.53/0.58 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % 0.53/0.58 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.58 % Proof found % 0.53/0.58 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 0.53/0.58 % SZS output start Proof % 0.53/0.58 %ClaNum:20(EqnAxiom:15) % 0.53/0.58 %VarNum:8(SingletonVarNum:5) % 0.53/0.58 %MaxLitNum:2 % 0.53/0.58 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 0.53/0.58 %SharedTerms:9 % 0.53/0.58 %goalClause: 19 % 0.53/0.58 %singleGoalClaCount:1 % 0.53/0.58 [16]P1(a1,a2,a4) % 0.53/0.58 [19]~P1(a1,a2,a4) % 0.53/0.58 [18]P3(a1,f3(a4),a2,a5,a6) % 0.53/0.58 [17]P2(x171,x171,x172) % 0.53/0.58 [20]E(x201,x202)+~P2(x201,x202,x203) % 0.53/0.58 %EqnAxiom % 0.53/0.58 [1]E(x11,x11) % 0.53/0.58 [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22) % 0.53/0.58 [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33) % 0.53/0.58 [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f3(x41),f3(x42)) % 0.53/0.58 [5]P1(x52,x53,x54)+~E(x51,x52)+~P1(x51,x53,x54) % 0.53/0.58 [6]P1(x63,x62,x64)+~E(x61,x62)+~P1(x63,x61,x64) % 0.53/0.58 [7]P1(x73,x74,x72)+~E(x71,x72)+~P1(x73,x74,x71) % 0.53/0.58 [8]P2(x82,x83,x84)+~E(x81,x82)+~P2(x81,x83,x84) % 0.53/0.58 [9]P2(x93,x92,x94)+~E(x91,x92)+~P2(x93,x91,x94) % 0.53/0.58 [10]P2(x103,x104,x102)+~E(x101,x102)+~P2(x103,x104,x101) % 0.53/0.58 [11]P3(x112,x113,x114,x115,x116)+~E(x111,x112)+~P3(x111,x113,x114,x115,x116) % 0.53/0.58 [12]P3(x123,x122,x124,x125,x126)+~E(x121,x122)+~P3(x123,x121,x124,x125,x126) % 0.53/0.58 [13]P3(x133,x134,x132,x135,x136)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x133,x134,x131,x135,x136) % 0.53/0.58 [14]P3(x143,x144,x145,x142,x146)+~E(x141,x142)+~P3(x143,x144,x145,x141,x146) % 0.53/0.58 [15]P3(x153,x154,x155,x156,x152)+~E(x151,x152)+~P3(x153,x154,x155,x156,x151) % 0.53/0.58 % 0.53/0.58 %------------------------------------------- % 0.53/0.58 cnf(21,plain, % 0.53/0.58 ($false), % 0.53/0.58 inference(scs_inference,[],[19,16]), % 0.53/0.58 ['proof']). % 0.53/0.58 % SZS output end Proof % 0.53/0.58 % Total time :0.000000s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------