%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW181+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:11:41 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 76.58s 11.84s
% Output : CNFRefutation 76.58s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 22 ( 10 ~; 6 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 9 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 16 ( 16 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
? [X5] :
( ! [X4] :
( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X4),v_r)
=> c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X4)),X5) )
& c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(fact__096_B_Bz_O_Acmod_Az_A_060_061_Ar_A_061_061_062_Acmod_A_Ipoly_A_IpCons_Ac_Acs_J_Az_J_A_060_061_A1_A_L_Acmod_Ac_A_L_Aabs_A_Ir_A_K_Am_J_096,axiom,
! [X24] :
( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X24),v_r)
=> c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X24)),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____)),c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),v_m____)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact__096_B_Bz_O_Acmod_Az_A_060_061_Ar_A_061_061_062_Acmod_A_Ipoly_A_IpCons_Ac_Acs_J_Az_J_A_060_061_A1_A_L_Acmod_Ac_A_L_Aabs_A_Ir_A_K_Am_J_096) ).
fof(fact_kp,axiom,
c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____)),c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),v_m____)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_kp) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X5] :
( ! [X4] :
( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X4),v_r)
=> c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X4)),X5) )
& c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X5) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X2906] :
( ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2906)
| ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),esk52_1(X2906))),X2906) )
& ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2906)
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,esk52_1(X2906)),v_r) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X337] :
( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X337)),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____)),c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),v_m____))))
| ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X337),v_r) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact__096_B_Bz_O_Acmod_Az_A_060_061_Ar_A_061_061_062_Acmod_A_Ipoly_A_IpCons_Ac_Acs_J_Az_J_A_060_061_A1_A_L_Acmod_Ac_A_L_Aabs_A_Ir_A_K_Am_J_096])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1)
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,esk52_1(X1)),v_r) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____)),c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),v_m____)))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_kp]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X1),v_r)
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X1)),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____)),c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),v_m____)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,esk52_1(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____)),c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),v_m____))))),v_r),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1)
| ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),esk52_1(X1))),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),esk52_1(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____)),c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),v_m____)))))),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____)),c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),v_m____)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),esk52_1(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____)),c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),v_m____)))))),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____)),c_Groups_Oabs__class_Oabs(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_RealDef_Oreal),v_r),v_m____)))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
$false,
inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWW181+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:42:47 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 76.58/11.84 % Version: 3.5.1
% 76.58/11.84 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 76.58/11.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2993541 completed with status 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 76.58/11.84 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 76.58/11.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 76.58/11.84 % No SInE strategy applied
% 76.58/11.84 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 76.58/11.84 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 2993550 completed with status 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 76.58/11.84 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 76.58/11.84 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 76.58/11.84 % No SInE strategy applied
% 76.58/11.84 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 76.58/11.84 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 76.58/11.84 % Preprocessing time : 0.039 s
% 76.58/11.84 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 76.58/11.84 % SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 76.58/11.84
% 76.58/11.84 % Proof found!
% 76.58/11.84 % SZS status Theorem
% 76.58/11.84 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 76.58/11.84 % Parsed axioms : 1273
% 76.58/11.84 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Initial clauses : 1697
% 76.58/11.84 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 69
% 76.58/11.84 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1628
% 76.58/11.84 % Processed clauses : 38158
% 76.58/11.84 % ...of these trivial : 1441
% 76.58/11.84 % ...subsumed : 26717
% 76.58/11.84 % ...remaining for further processing : 10000
% 76.58/11.84 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 923
% 76.58/11.84 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Backward-subsumed : 216
% 76.58/11.84 % Backward-rewritten : 406
% 76.58/11.84 % Generated clauses : 378718
% 76.58/11.84 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 304019
% 76.58/11.84 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 32
% 76.58/11.84 % Paramodulations : 377738
% 76.58/11.84 % Factorizations : 14
% 76.58/11.84 % NegExts : 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Equation resolutions : 981
% 76.58/11.84 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Total rewrite steps : 307357
% 76.58/11.84 % ...of those cached : 286920
% 76.58/11.84 % Propositional unsat checks : 2
% 76.58/11.84 % Propositional check models : 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 76.58/11.84 % Propositional clauses : 276204
% 76.58/11.84 % Propositional clauses after purity: 19533
% 76.58/11.84 % Propositional unsat core size : 2
% 76.58/11.84 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 76.58/11.84 % Propositional encoding time : 0.639
% 76.58/11.84 % Propositional solver time : 0.107
% 76.58/11.84 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 76.58/11.84 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.573
% 76.58/11.84 % Success case prop solver time : 0.052
% 76.58/11.84 % Current number of processed clauses : 7912
% 76.58/11.84 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1504
% 76.58/11.84 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 87
% 76.58/11.84 % Negative unit clauses : 1074
% 76.58/11.84 % Non-unit-clauses : 5247
% 76.58/11.84 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 268292
% 76.58/11.84 % ...number of literals in the above : 565017
% 76.58/11.84 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Current number of archived clauses : 1950
% 76.58/11.84 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1862749
% 76.58/11.84 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1035019
% 76.58/11.84 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17445
% 76.58/11.84 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 181790
% 76.58/11.84 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 76.58/11.84 % BW rewrite match attempts : 60884
% 76.58/11.84 % BW rewrite match successes : 841
% 76.58/11.84 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Condensation successes : 0
% 76.58/11.84 % Termbank termtop insertions : 10211433
% 76.58/11.84 % Search garbage collected termcells : 20260
% 76.58/11.84
% 76.58/11.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 76.58/11.84 % User time : 10.632 s
% 76.58/11.84 % System time : 0.373 s
% 76.58/11.84 % Total time : 11.005 s
% 76.58/11.84 % Maximum resident set size: 10160 pages
% 76.58/11.84
% 76.58/11.84 % -------------------------------------------------
% 76.58/11.84 % User time : 52.308 s
% 76.58/11.84 % System time : 1.682 s
% 76.58/11.84 % Total time : 53.990 s
% 76.58/11.84 % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 76.58/11.84 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------