%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW182+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 35.45s 5.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 35.45s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 27 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 52 ( 27 ~; 18 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 55 ( 6 sgn 28 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),v_h) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ozero,axiom,
! [X94] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X94)
=> class_Groups_Ozero(X94) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ozero) ).
fof(fact_monom__eq__0,axiom,
! [X17,X5] :
( class_Groups_Ozero(X5)
=> c_Polynomial_Omonom(X5,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X5),X17) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_monom__eq__0) ).
fof(tfree_0,hypothesis,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(t_a),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_0) ).
fof(fact_offset__poly__pCons,axiom,
! [X4,X24,X19,X5] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X5)
=> c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X5,c_Polynomial_OpCons(X5,X19,X24),X4) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5),c_Polynomial_Osmult(X5,X4,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X5,X24,X4)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X5,X19,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X5,X24,X4))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_offset__poly__pCons) ).
fof(fact_offset__poly__0,axiom,
! [X4,X5] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X5)
=> c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X5,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)),X4) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_offset__poly__0) ).
fof(fact_smult__0__right,axiom,
! [X19,X5] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X5)
=> c_Polynomial_Osmult(X5,X19,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_smult__0__right) ).
fof(fact_add__poly__code_I1_J,axiom,
! [X22,X5] :
( class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X5)
=> c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)),X22) = X22 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_add__poly__code_I1_J) ).
fof(clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add,axiom,
! [X94] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X94)
=> class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X94) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),v_h) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),v_h) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X2994] :
( class_Groups_Ozero(X2994)
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X2994) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ozero])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),v_h) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X140,X141] :
( c_Polynomial_Omonom(X141,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X141),X140) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X141))
| ~ class_Groups_Ozero(X141) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_monom__eq__0])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| class_Groups_Ozero(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(t_a),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[tfree_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),v_h) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ class_Groups_Ozero(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Omonom(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
class_Groups_Ozero(t_a),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X317,X318,X319,X320] :
( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X320,c_Polynomial_OpCons(X320,X319,X318),X317) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X320),c_Polynomial_Osmult(X320,X317,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X320,X318,X317)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X320,X319,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X320,X318,X317)))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X320) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_offset__poly__pCons])])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X100,X101] :
( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X101,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X101)),X100) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X101))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X101) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_offset__poly__0])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1)),v_h) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X1,c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,X2,X3),X4) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,X4,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X1,X3,X4)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,X2,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X1,X3,X4))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X2) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X212,X213] :
( c_Polynomial_Osmult(X213,X212,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X213))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X213))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X213) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_smult__0__right])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a),c_Polynomial_Osmult(t_a,v_h,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1),v_h)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1),v_h))) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(X1,c_Polynomial_Omonom(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2),X3) = c_Polynomial_Omonom(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,X2,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
fof(c_0_28,plain,
! [X305,X306] :
( c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X306),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X306)),X305) = X305
| ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X306) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_add__poly__code_I1_J])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a),c_Polynomial_Osmult(t_a,v_h,c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1))) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,X2,c_Polynomial_Omonom(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X3)) = c_Polynomial_Omonom(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X3) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_17]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1)
| c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X2) = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a),c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1),c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1))) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Polynomial_Omonom(t_a,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a),X1)),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( ~ class_Groups_Ozero(X1)
| ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1)
| c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),c_Polynomial_Omonom(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2),X3) = X3 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_34,plain,
! [X2988] :
( class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X2988)
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X2988) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(t_a),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWW182+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:41:02 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 35.45/5.72 % Version: 3.5.1
% 35.45/5.72 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 35.45/5.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2609477 completed with status 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 35.45/5.72 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 35.45/5.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 35.45/5.72 % No SInE strategy applied
% 35.45/5.72 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 35.45/5.72 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2609493 completed with status 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 35.45/5.72 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 35.45/5.72 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 35.45/5.72 % No SInE strategy applied
% 35.45/5.72 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 35.45/5.72 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 35.45/5.72 % Preprocessing time : 0.040 s
% 35.45/5.72 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 35.45/5.72
% 35.45/5.72 % Proof found!
% 35.45/5.72 % SZS status Theorem
% 35.45/5.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 35.45/5.72 % Parsed axioms : 1181
% 35.45/5.72 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Initial clauses : 1638
% 35.45/5.72 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 80
% 35.45/5.72 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1558
% 35.45/5.72 % Processed clauses : 15672
% 35.45/5.72 % ...of these trivial : 306
% 35.45/5.72 % ...subsumed : 10170
% 35.45/5.72 % ...remaining for further processing : 5196
% 35.45/5.72 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1597
% 35.45/5.72 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Backward-subsumed : 82
% 35.45/5.72 % Backward-rewritten : 158
% 35.45/5.72 % Generated clauses : 92800
% 35.45/5.72 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 83060
% 35.45/5.72 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 20
% 35.45/5.72 % Paramodulations : 91198
% 35.45/5.72 % Factorizations : 10
% 35.45/5.72 % NegExts : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Equation resolutions : 1620
% 35.45/5.72 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Total rewrite steps : 190776
% 35.45/5.72 % ...of those cached : 188719
% 35.45/5.72 % Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 35.45/5.72 % Propositional check models : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 35.45/5.72 % Propositional encoding time : 0.219
% 35.45/5.72 % Propositional solver time : 0.140
% 35.45/5.72 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 35.45/5.72 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 35.45/5.72 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 35.45/5.72 % Current number of processed clauses : 3552
% 35.45/5.72 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 275
% 35.45/5.72 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 23
% 35.45/5.72 % Negative unit clauses : 125
% 35.45/5.72 % Non-unit-clauses : 3129
% 35.45/5.72 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 68504
% 35.45/5.72 % ...number of literals in the above : 231533
% 35.45/5.72 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Current number of archived clauses : 1500
% 35.45/5.72 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1100855
% 35.45/5.72 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 794989
% 35.45/5.72 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3569
% 35.45/5.72 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10532
% 35.45/5.72 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2417
% 35.45/5.72 % BW rewrite match successes : 279
% 35.45/5.72 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Condensation successes : 0
% 35.45/5.72 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2597675
% 35.45/5.72 % Search garbage collected termcells : 21481
% 35.45/5.72
% 35.45/5.72 % -------------------------------------------------
% 35.45/5.72 % User time : 4.927 s
% 35.45/5.72 % System time : 0.163 s
% 35.45/5.72 % Total time : 5.090 s
% 35.45/5.72 % Maximum resident set size: 10148 pages
% 35.45/5.72
% 35.45/5.72 % -------------------------------------------------
% 35.45/5.72 % User time : 24.055 s
% 35.45/5.72 % System time : 0.765 s
% 35.45/5.72 % Total time : 24.820 s
% 35.45/5.72 % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 35.45/5.72 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------