↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWW186+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:03 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.69s 1.20s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.69s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (  49 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   71 (  31   ~;  26   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   45 (   6 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_offset__poly__eq__0__lemma,axiom,
    ! [X6,X7,X8,X5] :
      ( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X5)
     => ( c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5),c_Polynomial_Osmult(X5,X8,X7),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X5,X6,X7)) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5))
       => X7 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_offset__poly__eq__0__lemma) ).

fof(fact_add__poly__code_I1_J,axiom,
    ! [X10,X5] :
      ( class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X5)
     => c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)),X10) = X10 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_add__poly__code_I1_J) ).

fof(clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add,axiom,
    ! [X87] :
      ( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X87)
     => class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X87) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add) ).

fof(fact_smult__0__right,axiom,
    ! [X6,X5] :
      ( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X5)
     => c_Polynomial_Osmult(X5,X6,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X5)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_smult__0__right) ).

fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
    ( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,v_p,v_h) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))
   => v_p = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
    c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a),c_Polynomial_Osmult(t_a,v_h,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,v_p,v_h)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,v_p,v_h))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).

fof(tfree_0,hypothesis,
    class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(t_a),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',tfree_0) ).

fof(conj_2,conjecture,
    ( v_p = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))
    & v_a = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_2) ).

fof(fact_pCons__eq__0__iff,axiom,
    ! [X11,X12,X13] :
      ( class_Groups_Ozero(X13)
     => ( c_Polynomial_OpCons(X13,X12,X11) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X13))
      <=> ( X11 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X13))
          & X12 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X13) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_pCons__eq__0__iff) ).

fof(clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ozero,axiom,
    ! [X87] :
      ( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X87)
     => class_Groups_Ozero(X87) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ozero) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X102,X103,X104,X105] :
      ( X103 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X105))
      | c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X105),c_Polynomial_Osmult(X105,X104,X103),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X105,X102,X103)) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X105))
      | ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X105) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_offset__poly__eq__0__lemma])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X132,X133] :
      ( c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X133),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X133)),X132) = X132
      | ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X133) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_add__poly__code_I1_J])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X3003] :
      ( class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X3003)
      | ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X3003) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X136,X137] :
      ( c_Polynomial_Osmult(X137,X136,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X137))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X137))
      | ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X137) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_smult__0__right])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( v_p = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))
    | c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,v_p,v_h) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,X2,X3),c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,X4,X3)) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))
    | ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
    | X3 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a),c_Polynomial_Osmult(t_a,v_h,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,v_p,v_h)),c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,v_p,v_h))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(t_a),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[tfree_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1)
    | c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X2) = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
    | class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
    | c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,X2,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    ( c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,v_p,v_h) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))
    | v_p = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    c_Fundamental__Theorem__Algebra__Mirabelle_Ooffset__poly(t_a,v_p,v_h) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
    | c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)),X2) = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( v_p = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))
      & v_a = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,hypothesis,
    c_Polynomial_Osmult(t_a,X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)) = v_p,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a)),X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_p != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))
    | v_a != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X125,X126,X127] :
      ( ( ~ class_Groups_Ozero(X127)
        | c_Polynomial_OpCons(X127,X126,X125) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X127))
        | X125 != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X127))
        | X126 != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X127) )
      & ( ~ class_Groups_Ozero(X127)
        | c_Polynomial_OpCons(X127,X126,X125) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X127))
        | X125 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X127)) )
      & ( ~ class_Groups_Ozero(X127)
        | c_Polynomial_OpCons(X127,X126,X125) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X127))
        | X126 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X127) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_pCons__eq__0__iff])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    c_Polynomial_Osmult(t_a,X1,v_p) = v_p,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a),v_p,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( v_p != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(t_a))
    | v_a != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ class_Groups_Ozero(X2)
    | c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X1,X3) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X2))
    | X1 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    c_Polynomial_OpCons(t_a,v_a,v_p) = v_p,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_22]),c_0_26]),c_0_22]),c_0_26]),c_0_26]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(t_a) != v_a,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_26])]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X3009] :
      ( class_Groups_Ozero(X3009)
      | ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X3009) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[clrel_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0__Groups_Ozero])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    ~ class_Groups_Ozero(t_a),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_26])]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
    | class_Groups_Ozero(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_17])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWW186+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:39:35 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.69/1.20  % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.69/1.20  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.69/1.20  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with pid 470230 completed with status 0
% 4.69/1.20  % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c
% 4.69/1.20  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.69/1.20  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.69/1.20  % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.69/1.20  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.69/1.20  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 151s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 470241 completed with status 0
% 4.69/1.20  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 4.69/1.20  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.69/1.20  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 4.69/1.20  % No SInE strategy applied
% 4.69/1.20  % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.69/1.20  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_S4c with 151s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 4.69/1.20  % Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 4.69/1.20  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.69/1.20  
% 4.69/1.20  % Proof found!
% 4.69/1.20  % SZS status Theorem
% 4.69/1.20  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.69/1.20  % Parsed axioms                        : 1182
% 4.69/1.20  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 4.69/1.20  % Initial clauses                      : 1566
% 4.69/1.20  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 78
% 4.69/1.20  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1488
% 4.69/1.20  % Processed clauses                    : 3314
% 4.69/1.20  % ...of these trivial                  : 35
% 4.69/1.20  % ...subsumed                          : 809
% 4.69/1.20  % ...remaining for further processing  : 2470
% 4.69/1.20  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 243
% 4.69/1.20  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 4.69/1.20  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 4.69/1.20  % Backward-rewritten                   : 34
% 4.69/1.20  % Generated clauses                    : 5664
% 4.69/1.20  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4278
% 4.69/1.20  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 4.69/1.20  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 2
% 4.69/1.20  % Paramodulations                      : 5429
% 4.69/1.20  % Factorizations                       : 4
% 4.69/1.20  % NegExts                              : 0
% 4.69/1.20  % Equation resolutions                 : 259
% 4.69/1.20  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 4.69/1.20  % Total rewrite steps                  : 3353
% 4.69/1.20  % ...of those cached                   : 2730
% 4.69/1.20  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 4.69/1.20  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 4.69/1.20  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.69/1.20  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 4.69/1.20  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.69/1.20  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 4.69/1.20  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 4.69/1.20  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 4.69/1.20  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 4.69/1.20  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 4.69/1.20  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 4.69/1.20  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 4.69/1.20  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1109
% 4.69/1.20  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 434
% 4.69/1.20  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 9
% 4.69/1.20  %    Negative unit clauses             : 61
% 4.69/1.20  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 605
% 4.69/1.20  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3597
% 4.69/1.20  % ...number of literals in the above   : 7077
% 4.69/1.20  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 4.69/1.20  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1224
% 4.69/1.20  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 167403
% 4.69/1.20  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 104300
% 4.69/1.20  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 418
% 4.69/1.20  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 962
% 4.69/1.20  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 4.69/1.20  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 4356
% 4.69/1.20  % BW rewrite match successes           : 218
% 4.69/1.20  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 4.69/1.20  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 4.69/1.20  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 256123
% 4.69/1.20  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 20579
% 4.69/1.20  
% 4.69/1.20  % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.69/1.20  % User time                : 0.620 s
% 4.69/1.20  % System time              : 0.039 s
% 4.69/1.20  % Total time               : 0.660 s
% 4.69/1.20  % Maximum resident set size: 9876 pages
% 4.69/1.20  
% 4.69/1.20  % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.69/1.20  % User time                : 2.857 s
% 4.69/1.20  % System time              : 0.159 s
% 4.69/1.20  % Total time               : 3.016 s
% 4.69/1.20  % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 4.69/1.20  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------