↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWW204+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:11:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.09s 1.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   24 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   5 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   31 (  14   ~;  13   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   25 (   1 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),v_r)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_real__le__linear,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X7),X8))
      | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X8),X7)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_real__le__linear) ).

fof(fact_real__le__antisym,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X8),X7))
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X7),X8))
       => X8 = X7 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_real__le__antisym) ).

fof(fact_real__le__trans,axiom,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X11),X10))
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X10),X9))
       => hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X11),X9)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_real__le__trans) ).

fof(fact__0960_A_060_061_Acmod_A_Is_A0_J_096,axiom,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact__0960_A_060_061_Acmod_A_Is_A0_J_096) ).

fof(fact_assms,axiom,
    ! [X6] : hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,X6))),v_r)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_assms) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),v_r)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),v_r)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),v_r)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X126,X127] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X126),X127))
      | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X127),X126)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_real__le__linear]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X131,X132] :
      ( X132 = X131
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X131),X132))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X132),X131)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_real__le__antisym])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X128,X129,X130] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X130),X128))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X129),X128))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X130),X129)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_real__le__trans])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),v_r)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X2),X1))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X2),X1))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),X2))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact__0960_A_060_061_Acmod_A_Is_A0_J_096]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X2),X3))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),X2))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_r),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X124] : hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,X124))),v_r)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_assms]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat)))),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal)))
    | c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),v_r))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,X1))),v_r)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(v_s,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_12]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWW204+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.46  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.46  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.46  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.46  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.46  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.46  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.21/0.46  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:41:26 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.47  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.47  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.54  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.54  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.09/1.54  % Version: 3.5.1
% 4.09/1.54  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.09/1.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % new_bool_1 with pid 1585510 completed with status 0
% 4.09/1.54  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 4.09/1.54  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.09/1.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 4.09/1.54  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 4.09/1.54  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.09/1.54  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1585513 completed with status 0
% 4.09/1.54  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 4.09/1.54  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 4.09/1.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 4.09/1.54  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 4.09/1.54  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 4.09/1.54  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 4.09/1.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 4.09/1.54  % Preprocessing time       : 0.011 s
% 4.09/1.54  
% 4.09/1.54  % Proof found!
% 4.09/1.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 4.09/1.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.09/1.54  % Parsed axioms                        : 1264
% 4.09/1.54  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 984
% 4.09/1.54  % Initial clauses                      : 416
% 4.09/1.54  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 18
% 4.09/1.54  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 398
% 4.09/1.54  % Processed clauses                    : 4687
% 4.09/1.54  % ...of these trivial                  : 432
% 4.09/1.54  % ...subsumed                          : 3111
% 4.09/1.54  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1144
% 4.09/1.54  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 208
% 4.09/1.54  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 4.09/1.54  % Backward-subsumed                    : 27
% 4.09/1.54  % Backward-rewritten                   : 17
% 4.09/1.54  % Generated clauses                    : 26663
% 4.09/1.54  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21039
% 4.09/1.54  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 4.09/1.54  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 4.09/1.54  % Paramodulations                      : 26435
% 4.09/1.54  % Factorizations                       : 8
% 4.09/1.54  % NegExts                              : 0
% 4.09/1.54  % Equation resolutions                 : 225
% 4.09/1.54  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 4.09/1.54  % Total rewrite steps                  : 11718
% 4.09/1.54  % ...of those cached                   : 9615
% 4.09/1.54  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 4.09/1.54  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 4.09/1.54  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.09/1.54  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 4.09/1.54  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.09/1.54  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 4.09/1.54  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 4.09/1.54  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 4.09/1.54  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 4.09/1.54  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 4.09/1.54  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 4.09/1.54  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 4.09/1.54  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1055
% 4.09/1.54  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 394
% 4.09/1.54  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 5
% 4.09/1.54  %    Negative unit clauses             : 235
% 4.09/1.54  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 421
% 4.09/1.54  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16613
% 4.09/1.54  % ...number of literals in the above   : 35789
% 4.09/1.54  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 4.09/1.54  % Current number of archived clauses   : 44
% 4.09/1.54  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 12723
% 4.09/1.54  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 11549
% 4.09/1.54  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 551
% 4.09/1.54  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14302
% 4.09/1.54  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 4.09/1.54  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 10967
% 4.09/1.54  % BW rewrite match successes           : 39
% 4.09/1.54  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 4.09/1.54  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 4.09/1.54  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 544497
% 4.09/1.54  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 11329
% 4.09/1.54  
% 4.09/1.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.09/1.54  % User time                : 0.771 s
% 4.09/1.54  % System time              : 0.039 s
% 4.09/1.54  % Total time               : 0.811 s
% 4.09/1.54  % Maximum resident set size: 6200 pages
% 4.09/1.54  
% 4.09/1.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 4.09/1.54  % User time                : 0.850 s
% 4.09/1.54  % System time              : 0.049 s
% 4.09/1.54  % Total time               : 0.898 s
% 4.09/1.54  % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 4.09/1.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------