↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWW215+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:11:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 15.88s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   58 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   51 (  24   ~;  16   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(fact_not__leE,axiom,
    ! [X7,X22,X4] :
      ( class_Orderings_Olinorder(X4)
     => ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X4,X22,X7)
       => c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X4,X7,X22) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_not__leE) ).

fof(fact_order__less__not__sym,axiom,
    ! [X22,X7,X4] :
      ( class_Orderings_Opreorder(X4)
     => ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X4,X7,X22)
       => ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X4,X22,X7) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_order__less__not__sym) ).

fof(fact_xt1_I10_J,axiom,
    ! [X13,X7,X22,X4] :
      ( class_Orderings_Oorder(X4)
     => ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X4,X22,X7)
       => ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X4,X13,X22)
         => c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X4,X13,X7) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_xt1_I10_J) ).

fof(arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Olinorder,axiom,
    class_Orderings_Olinorder(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Olinorder) ).

fof(fact_H_I2_J,axiom,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_H_I2_J) ).

fof(arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Oorder,axiom,
    class_Orderings_Oorder(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Oorder) ).

fof(fact_H_I5_J,axiom,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),v_da____),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_H_I5_J) ).

fof(arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Opreorder,axiom,
    class_Orderings_Opreorder(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Opreorder) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X7,X22,X4] :
      ( class_Orderings_Olinorder(X4)
     => ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X4,X22,X7)
       => c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X4,X7,X22) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_not__leE]) ).

fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X238,X239,X240] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X240,X238,X239)
      | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X240,X239,X238)
      | ~ class_Orderings_Olinorder(X240) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X22,X7,X4] :
      ( class_Orderings_Opreorder(X4)
     => ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X4,X7,X22)
       => ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X4,X22,X7) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_order__less__not__sym]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X185,X186,X187,X188] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X188,X185,X186)
      | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X188,X185,X187)
      | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X188,X187,X186)
      | ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X188) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_xt1_I10_J])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ class_Orderings_Olinorder(X1)
    | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X3,X2)
    | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    class_Orderings_Olinorder(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Olinorder]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X147,X148,X149] :
      ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X149,X147,X148)
      | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X149,X148,X147)
      | ~ class_Orderings_Opreorder(X149) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Oorder(X1)
    | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_H_I2_J]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    class_Orderings_Oorder(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Oorder]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X2,X1)
    | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ class_Orderings_Opreorder(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z)),v_da____),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_H_I5_J]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    class_Orderings_Opreorder(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_RealDef__Oreal__Orderings_Opreorder]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1)
    | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_w____,v_z))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWW215+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/15.57  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/15.57  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/15.57  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/15.57  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/15.57  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/15.57  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/15.57  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/15.57  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:42:43 UTC 2026
% 0.11/15.57  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/15.57  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/15.61  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/15.61  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/15.88  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/15.88  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/15.88  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 593484 completed with status 0
% 0.15/15.88  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/15.88  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/15.88  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/15.88  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/15.88  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/15.88  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % SubtermCWHack with pid 593496 completed with status 0
% 0.15/15.88  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/15.88  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/15.88  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/15.88  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/15.88  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/15.88  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/15.88  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/15.88  % Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.15/15.88  
% 0.15/15.88  % Proof found!
% 0.15/15.88  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/15.88  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/15.88  % Parsed axioms                        : 1278
% 0.15/15.88  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/15.88  % Initial clauses                      : 1840
% 0.15/15.88  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 80
% 0.15/15.88  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 1760
% 0.15/15.88  % Processed clauses                    : 3383
% 0.15/15.88  % ...of these trivial                  : 79
% 0.15/15.88  % ...subsumed                          : 1815
% 0.15/15.88  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1489
% 0.15/15.88  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 184
% 0.15/15.88  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/15.88  % Backward-subsumed                    : 4
% 0.15/15.88  % Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.15/15.88  % Generated clauses                    : 10000
% 0.15/15.88  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7838
% 0.15/15.88  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/15.88  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.15/15.88  % Paramodulations                      : 9806
% 0.15/15.88  % Factorizations                       : 8
% 0.15/15.88  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/15.88  % Equation resolutions                 : 195
% 0.15/15.88  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/15.88  % Total rewrite steps                  : 6132
% 0.15/15.88  % ...of those cached                   : 5575
% 0.15/15.88  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/15.88  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/15.88  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/15.88  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/15.88  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/15.88  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/15.88  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/15.88  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/15.88  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/15.88  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/15.88  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/15.88  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/15.88  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1377
% 0.15/15.88  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 544
% 0.15/15.88  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 6
% 0.15/15.88  %    Negative unit clauses             : 155
% 0.15/15.88  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 672
% 0.15/15.88  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6204
% 0.15/15.88  % ...number of literals in the above   : 15308
% 0.15/15.88  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/15.88  % Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.15/15.88  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 42762
% 0.15/15.88  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 31008
% 0.15/15.88  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 643
% 0.15/15.88  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3680
% 0.15/15.88  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/15.88  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2838
% 0.15/15.88  % BW rewrite match successes           : 58
% 0.15/15.88  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/15.88  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/15.88  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 271312
% 0.15/15.88  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 23048
% 0.15/15.88  
% 0.15/15.88  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/15.88  % User time                : 0.202 s
% 0.15/15.88  % System time              : 0.023 s
% 0.15/15.88  % Total time               : 0.224 s
% 0.15/15.88  % Maximum resident set size: 10496 pages
% 0.15/15.88  
% 0.15/15.88  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/15.88  % User time                : 0.660 s
% 0.15/15.88  % System time              : 0.086 s
% 0.15/15.88  % Total time               : 0.745 s
% 0.15/15.88  % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 0.15/15.88  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------