%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW225+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 6.00s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 31 ( 19 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 19 ~; 11 |; 2 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))),hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Nat_OSuc(hAPP(v_f____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(fact_not__less__eq__eq,axiom,
! [X19,X18] :
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X18,X19)
<=> c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(X19),X18) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_not__less__eq__eq) ).
fof(fact_Suc__eq__plus1,axiom,
! [X6] : c_Nat_OSuc(X6) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X6,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_Suc__eq__plus1) ).
fof(fact_real__of__nat__le__iff,axiom,
! [X18,X19] :
( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),X19),hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),X18))
<=> c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X19,X18) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_real__of__nat__le__iff) ).
fof(fact_real__eq__of__nat,axiom,
c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat) = c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_real__eq__of__nat) ).
fof(fact_nat__add__commute,axiom,
! [X6,X7] : c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X7,X6) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X6,X7),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_nat__add__commute) ).
fof(fact__096N1_A_L_AN2_A_060_061_Af_A_IN1_A_L_AN2_J_096,axiom,
c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____),hAPP(v_f____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact__096N1_A_L_AN2_A_060_061_Af_A_IN1_A_L_AN2_J_096) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))),hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Nat_OSuc(hAPP(v_f____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))),hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Nat_OSuc(hAPP(v_f____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X19,X18] :
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X18,X19)
<=> c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(X19),X18) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_not__less__eq__eq]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))),hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Nat_OSuc(hAPP(v_f____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X1002] : c_Nat_OSuc(X1002) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X1002,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_Suc__eq__plus1]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X305,X306] :
( ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),X306),hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),X305))
| ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X306,X305) )
& ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X306,X305)
| ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),X306),hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),X305)) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_real__of__nat__le__iff])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X162,X163] :
( ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X163,X162)
| ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(X162),X163) )
& ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(X162),X163)
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X163,X162) ) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))),hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Nat_OSuc(hAPP(v_f____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
c_Nat_OSuc(X1) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X1,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X1,X2)
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),X1),hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat) = c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(tc_RealDef_Oreal),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_real__eq__of__nat]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(X2),X1)
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X2,X1)
| ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc(X1),X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X303,X304] : c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X304,X303) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X303,X304),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_nat__add__commute]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))),hAPP(c_RealDef_Oreal(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,hAPP(v_f____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X1,X2)
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X1),hAPP(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2)) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X2,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),X1)
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X1,X2) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X1,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),X2)
| ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X2,X1) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____),hAPP(v_f____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact__096N1_A_L_AN2_A_060_061_Af_A_IN1_A_L_AN2_J_096]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X1,X2) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))),hAPP(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,hAPP(v_f____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____)),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_17]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,X2,X1)
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,hAPP(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(tc_RealDef_Oreal),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X1,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))),hAPP(c_Nat_Osemiring__1__class_Oof__nat(tc_RealDef_Oreal),X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(v_f____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____))),c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_N1____,v_N2____)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_26]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SWW225+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.39 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/5.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:43:31 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/5.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/6.00 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/6.00 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/6.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 697940 completed with status 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/6.00 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/6.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/6.00 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/6.00 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/6.00 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with pid 697949 completed with status 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Result found by G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI
% 0.15/6.00 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/6.00 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/6.00 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/6.00 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/6.00 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 0.15/6.00 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.15/6.00
% 0.15/6.00 % Proof found!
% 0.15/6.00 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/6.00 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/6.00 % Parsed axioms : 1269
% 0.15/6.00 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Initial clauses : 1758
% 0.15/6.00 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 58
% 0.15/6.00 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1700
% 0.15/6.00 % Processed clauses : 2871
% 0.15/6.00 % ...of these trivial : 153
% 0.15/6.00 % ...subsumed : 856
% 0.15/6.00 % ...remaining for further processing : 1862
% 0.15/6.00 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 195
% 0.15/6.00 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Backward-subsumed : 21
% 0.15/6.00 % Backward-rewritten : 21
% 0.15/6.00 % Generated clauses : 28287
% 0.15/6.00 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 25266
% 0.15/6.00 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 0.15/6.00 % Paramodulations : 28067
% 0.15/6.00 % Factorizations : 16
% 0.15/6.00 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Equation resolutions : 218
% 0.15/6.00 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Total rewrite steps : 25172
% 0.15/6.00 % ...of those cached : 22868
% 0.15/6.00 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/6.00 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/6.00 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/6.00 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/6.00 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/6.00 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/6.00 % Current number of processed clauses : 1695
% 0.15/6.00 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 419
% 0.15/6.00 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 0.15/6.00 % Negative unit clauses : 101
% 0.15/6.00 % Non-unit-clauses : 1165
% 0.15/6.00 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 23957
% 0.15/6.00 % ...number of literals in the above : 59985
% 0.15/6.00 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Current number of archived clauses : 46
% 0.15/6.00 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 171142
% 0.15/6.00 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 120283
% 0.15/6.00 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 461
% 0.15/6.00 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8811
% 0.15/6.00 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1501
% 0.15/6.00 % BW rewrite match successes : 117
% 0.15/6.00 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/6.00 % Termbank termtop insertions : 796001
% 0.15/6.00 % Search garbage collected termcells : 20166
% 0.15/6.00
% 0.15/6.00 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/6.00 % User time : 0.459 s
% 0.15/6.00 % System time : 0.038 s
% 0.15/6.00 % Total time : 0.497 s
% 0.15/6.00 % Maximum resident set size: 10160 pages
% 0.15/6.00
% 0.15/6.00 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/6.00 % User time : 1.977 s
% 0.15/6.00 % System time : 0.135 s
% 0.15/6.00 % Total time : 2.112 s
% 0.15/6.00 % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 0.15/6.00 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------