↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SWW232+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 03:29:18 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 10.88s 2.28s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 10.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  19   ~;  15   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   2 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   15 (  15 usr;   6 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   32 (   0 sgn  28   !;   4   ?;  11   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    v_cs____ != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_H) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( v_cs____ != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
     => ? [X2] :
        ! [X3] :
          ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X2,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X3))
         => c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X0,v_cs____)),X3))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_pCons_Ohyps) ).

fof(f1253,axiom,
    ( ? [X0] :
      ! [X1] :
        ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X0,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X1))
       => c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X1))) )
   => v_thesis____ ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(f1254,conjecture,
    v_thesis____,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).

fof(f1255,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1254]) ).

fof(f1260,plain,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(flattening,[],[f1255]) ).

fof(f1262,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( v_cs____ = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
      | ? [X2] :
        ! [X3] :
          ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X2,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X3))
          | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X0,v_cs____)),X3))) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f2399,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
      ? [X1] :
        ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X0,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X1))
        & ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X1))) )
    | v_thesis____ ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1253]) ).

fof(f2401,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( v_cs____ = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
      | ! [X3] :
          ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,sK1(X0,X1),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X3))
          | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X0,v_cs____)),X3))) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(X2,sK1(X0,X1))],[f1262]) ).

fof(f2763,plain,
    ( ! [X0] :
        ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X0,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,sK37(X0)))
        & ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),sK37(X0)))) )
    | v_thesis____ ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK37]),skolemize(X1,sK37(X0))],[f2399]) ).

fof(f2765,plain,
    v_cs____ != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2767,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( v_cs____ = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))
      | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,sK1(X0,X1),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X3))
      | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X0,v_cs____)),X3))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2401]) ).

fof(f4416,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X0,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,sK37(X0)))
      | v_thesis____ ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2763]) ).

fof(f4417,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),sK37(X0))))
      | v_thesis____ ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2763]) ).

fof(f4418,plain,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1260]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) != v_cs____,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2765]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X0,v_cs____)),X2)))
      | ( c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = v_cs____ )
      | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,sK1(X0,X1),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2767]) ).

tcf(c_1636,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( v_thesis____
      | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),sK37(X0)))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4417]) ).

tcf(c_1637,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( v_thesis____
      | c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X0,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,sK37(X0))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4416]) ).

tcf(c_1638,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v_thesis____,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4418]) ).

tcf(c_1793,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X0,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,sK37(X0))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_1637,c_1638,c_1637]) ).

tcf(c_2411,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),sK37(X0)))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_1636,c_1638,c_1636]) ).

tcf(c_2441,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,X1,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X0,v_cs____)),X2)))
      | ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,sK1(X0,X1),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X2)) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_50,c_52]) ).

tcf(c_2448,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,sK1(v_c____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,v_da____,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,sK37(X0))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2441,c_2411]) ).

tcf(c_10911,plain,
    $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1793,c_2448]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWW232+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 21:44:16 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.42  % Proving...
% 10.88/2.28  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 10.88/2.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % ------  iProver source info
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 10.88/2.28  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 10.88/2.28  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % ------ Parsing...
% 10.88/2.28  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...
% 10.88/2.28  % ------ Proving...
% 10.88/2.28  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % 
% 10.88/2.28  % clauses                               1590
% 10.88/2.28  % conjectures                           1
% 10.88/2.28  % EPR                                   326
% 10.88/2.28  % Horn                                  1420
% 10.88/2.28  % unary                                 398
% 10.88/2.28  % binary                                571
% 10.88/2.28  % lits                                  3704
% 10.88/2.28  % lits eq                               802
% 10.88/2.28  % fd_pure                               0
% 10.88/2.28  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 10.88/2.28  % fd_cond                               60
% 10.88/2.28  % fd_pseudo_cond                        160
% 10.88/2.28  % AC symbols                            0
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % ------ 
% 10.88/2.28  % Current options:
% 10.88/2.28  % ------ 
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % 
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % ------ Proving...
% 10.88/2.28  % 
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % ------ Proving...
% 10.88/2.28  % 
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 10.88/2.28  
% 10.88/2.28  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------