%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW235+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 33.12s 5.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 33.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 20 ( 11 ~; 6 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 6 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 32 ( 0 sgn 20 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____),hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),v_z____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____))),v_z____))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(fact_comm__semiring__1__class_Onormalizing__semiring__rules_I24_J,axiom,
! [X22,X5,X6] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X6)
=> c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X6,X5,X22) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X6,X22,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_comm__semiring__1__class_Onormalizing__semiring__rules_I24_J) ).
fof(fact_poly__pCons,axiom,
! [X9,X11,X5,X6] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X6)
=> hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X6,c_Polynomial_OpCons(X6,X5,X11)),X9) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X6,X5,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X6),X9),hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X6,X11),X9))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_poly__pCons) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).
fof(fact_norm__diff__ineq,axiom,
! [X4,X5,X6] :
( class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(X6)
=> c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X6,X5),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X6,X4)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X6,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X6,X5,X4))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_norm__diff__ineq) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector,axiom,
class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____),hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),v_z____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____))),v_z____))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____),hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),v_z____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____))),v_z____))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X768,X769,X770] :
( c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X770,X769,X768) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X770,X768,X769)
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X770) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_comm__semiring__1__class_Onormalizing__semiring__rules_I24_J])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____),hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),v_z____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____))),v_z____))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X199,X200,X201,X202] :
( hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X202,c_Polynomial_OpCons(X202,X201,X200)),X199) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X202,X201,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X202),X199),hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X202,X200),X199)))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X202) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_poly__pCons])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,X3) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X3,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____),hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),v_z____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____))),v_z____))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1,X2,X3)),X4) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),X4),hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,X3),X4))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X1,X2) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X196,X197,X198] :
( c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X198,X197),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X198,X196)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X198,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X198,X197,X196)))
| ~ class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(X198) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_norm__diff__ineq])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____),hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),v_z____))),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_aa____)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),v_z____),hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),v_z____)),v_aa____))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(X1)
| c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_RealDef_Oreal,c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X1,X2),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X1,X3)),c_RealVector_Onorm__class_Onorm(X1,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(X1,X2,X3))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
class_RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__RealVector_Oreal__normed__vector]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWW235+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.44 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.44 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.44 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.44 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.44 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.44 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.44 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:43:48 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.44 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.51 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.51 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 33.12/5.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 33.12/5.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 33.12/5.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2612717 completed with status 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 33.12/5.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 33.12/5.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 33.12/5.48 % No SInE strategy applied
% 33.12/5.48 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 33.12/5.48 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2612728 completed with status 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 33.12/5.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 33.12/5.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 33.12/5.48 % No SInE strategy applied
% 33.12/5.48 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 33.12/5.48 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 33.12/5.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.042 s
% 33.12/5.48 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 33.12/5.48
% 33.12/5.48 % Proof found!
% 33.12/5.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 33.12/5.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 33.12/5.48 % Parsed axioms : 1259
% 33.12/5.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Initial clauses : 1763
% 33.12/5.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 46
% 33.12/5.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1717
% 33.12/5.48 % Processed clauses : 10980
% 33.12/5.48 % ...of these trivial : 217
% 33.12/5.48 % ...subsumed : 5983
% 33.12/5.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 4780
% 33.12/5.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 593
% 33.12/5.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Backward-subsumed : 42
% 33.12/5.48 % Backward-rewritten : 57
% 33.12/5.48 % Generated clauses : 122723
% 33.12/5.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 111934
% 33.12/5.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 3
% 33.12/5.48 % Paramodulations : 122117
% 33.12/5.48 % Factorizations : 10
% 33.12/5.48 % NegExts : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Equation resolutions : 611
% 33.12/5.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Total rewrite steps : 71605
% 33.12/5.48 % ...of those cached : 68462
% 33.12/5.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 33.12/5.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 33.12/5.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 33.12/5.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 33.12/5.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 33.12/5.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 33.12/5.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 3112
% 33.12/5.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 659
% 33.12/5.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 15
% 33.12/5.48 % Negative unit clauses : 498
% 33.12/5.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 1940
% 33.12/5.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 103963
% 33.12/5.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 253987
% 33.12/5.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 1533
% 33.12/5.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 501085
% 33.12/5.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 375656
% 33.12/5.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2838
% 33.12/5.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 70677
% 33.12/5.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 28335
% 33.12/5.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 316
% 33.12/5.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 33.12/5.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2456934
% 33.12/5.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 20745
% 33.12/5.48
% 33.12/5.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 33.12/5.48 % User time : 4.579 s
% 33.12/5.48 % System time : 0.179 s
% 33.12/5.48 % Total time : 4.758 s
% 33.12/5.48 % Maximum resident set size: 10128 pages
% 33.12/5.48
% 33.12/5.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 33.12/5.48 % User time : 22.498 s
% 33.12/5.48 % System time : 0.839 s
% 33.12/5.48 % Total time : 23.338 s
% 33.12/5.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 33.12/5.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------