%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW256+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:10 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 94.32s 14.40s
% Output : CNFRefutation 108.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 38 ( 25 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 31 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 31 ( 18 ~; 8 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 4 sgn 21 !; 6 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_0,conjecture,
? [X3,X81] : hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X3),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X3),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))) != hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X81),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X81),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(fact_Suc__eq__plus1,axiom,
! [X4] : c_Nat_OSuc(X4) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X4,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_Suc__eq__plus1) ).
fof(fact_comm__semiring__1__class_Onormalizing__semiring__rules_I9_J,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X6)
=> hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X6),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X6)),X5) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_comm__semiring__1__class_Onormalizing__semiring__rules_I9_J) ).
fof(fact_plus__nat_Oadd__0,axiom,
! [X4] : c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat),X4) = X4,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_plus__nat_Oadd__0) ).
fof(fact_zero__neq__one,axiom,
! [X6] :
( class_Rings_Ozero__neq__one(X6)
=> c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X6) != c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_zero__neq__one) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1,axiom,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1) ).
fof(fact_power__one,axiom,
! [X4,X6] :
( class_Groups_Omonoid__mult(X6)
=> hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X6),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X6)),X4) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_power__one) ).
fof(fact_comm__semiring__1__class_Onormalizing__semiring__rules_I12_J,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X6)
=> hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X6),X5),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X6)) = X5 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_comm__semiring__1__class_Onormalizing__semiring__rules_I12_J) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Omonoid__mult,axiom,
class_Groups_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Omonoid__mult) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ozero__neq__one,axiom,
class_Rings_Ozero__neq__one(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ozero__neq__one) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X3,X81] : hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X3),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X3),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))) != hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X81),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X81),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X3,X81] : hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X3),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X3),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))) != hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X81),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X81),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
! [X2945,X2946] : hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2945),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2945),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2946),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2946),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X688] : c_Nat_OSuc(X688) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X688,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_Suc__eq__plus1]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X200,X201] :
( hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X201),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X201)),X200) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X201)
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X201) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_comm__semiring__1__class_Onormalizing__semiring__rules_I9_J])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Nat_OSuc(c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
c_Nat_OSuc(X1) = c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,X1,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X1030] : c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat),X1030) = X1030,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_plus__nat_Oadd__0]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X6] :
( class_Rings_Ozero__neq__one(X6)
=> c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X6) != c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X6) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_zero__neq__one]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1)),X2) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))))) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat))))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Nat_Onat,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Nat_Onat),X1) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X1037,X1038] :
( hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1038),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1038)),X1037) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1038)
| ~ class_Groups_Omonoid__mult(X1038) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_power__one])])]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X1008,X1009] :
( hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1009),X1008),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1009)) = X1008
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1009) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_comm__semiring__1__class_Onormalizing__semiring__rules_I12_J])])]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X1001] :
( c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1001) != c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1001)
| ~ class_Rings_Ozero__neq__one(X1001) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),X1) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)))) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X2),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ class_Groups_Omonoid__mult(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(X1),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1)),X2) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
class_Groups_Omonoid__mult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Omonoid__mult]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__1(X1)
| hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(X1),X2),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1)) = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1) != c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(X1)
| ~ class_Rings_Ozero__neq__one(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
class_Rings_Ozero__neq__one(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ozero__neq__one]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),c_Groups_Ominus__class_Ominus(tc_Nat_Onat,v_k____,c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Nat_Onat)))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Power_Opower__class_Opower(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),X1) = c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Groups_Otimes__class_Otimes(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1),c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
c_Groups_Oone__class_Oone(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]),c_0_36]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWW256+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.45 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.45 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:46:52 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.45 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 94.32/14.40 % Version: 3.5.1
% 94.32/14.40 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 94.32/14.40 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1963200 completed with status 0
% 94.32/14.40 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 94.32/14.40 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 94.32/14.40 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 94.32/14.40 % No SInE strategy applied
% 94.32/14.40 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 94.32/14.40 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting G-E--_008_C45_F1_PI_SE_Q4_CS_SP_S4SI with 113s (1) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting G-E--_207_C01_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_S5PRR_S0Y with 113s (1) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting G-E--_208_B07CMA_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 113s (1) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1963208 completed with status 0
% 94.32/14.40 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 94.32/14.40 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 94.32/14.40 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 94.32/14.40 % No SInE strategy applied
% 94.32/14.40 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 94.32/14.40 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 94.32/14.40 % Preprocessing time : 0.042 s
% 94.32/14.40 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 94.32/14.40
% 94.32/14.40 % Proof found!
% 94.32/14.40 % SZS status Theorem
% 94.32/14.40 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 108.24/14.40 % Parsed axioms : 1284
% 108.24/14.40 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Initial clauses : 1723
% 108.24/14.40 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 51
% 108.24/14.40 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1672
% 108.24/14.40 % Processed clauses : 37230
% 108.24/14.40 % ...of these trivial : 652
% 108.24/14.40 % ...subsumed : 29303
% 108.24/14.40 % ...remaining for further processing : 7275
% 108.24/14.40 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 6087
% 108.24/14.40 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Backward-subsumed : 328
% 108.24/14.40 % Backward-rewritten : 123
% 108.24/14.40 % Generated clauses : 425451
% 108.24/14.40 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 389645
% 108.24/14.40 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 44
% 108.24/14.40 % Paramodulations : 419306
% 108.24/14.40 % Factorizations : 15
% 108.24/14.40 % NegExts : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Equation resolutions : 6145
% 108.24/14.40 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Total rewrite steps : 257279
% 108.24/14.40 % ...of those cached : 234378
% 108.24/14.40 % Propositional unsat checks : 1
% 108.24/14.40 % Propositional check models : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 108.24/14.40 % Propositional encoding time : 0.463
% 108.24/14.40 % Propositional solver time : 0.326
% 108.24/14.40 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 108.24/14.40 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 108.24/14.40 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 108.24/14.40 % Current number of processed clauses : 5312
% 108.24/14.40 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 699
% 108.24/14.40 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 65
% 108.24/14.40 % Negative unit clauses : 744
% 108.24/14.40 % Non-unit-clauses : 3804
% 108.24/14.40 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 352038
% 108.24/14.40 % ...number of literals in the above : 857998
% 108.24/14.40 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Current number of archived clauses : 1827
% 108.24/14.40 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1173411
% 108.24/14.40 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 901598
% 108.24/14.40 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9809
% 108.24/14.40 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 97753
% 108.24/14.40 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % BW rewrite match attempts : 30260
% 108.24/14.40 % BW rewrite match successes : 1277
% 108.24/14.40 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Condensation successes : 0
% 108.24/14.40 % Termbank termtop insertions : 10506214
% 108.24/14.40 % Search garbage collected termcells : 20330
% 108.24/14.40
% 108.24/14.40 % -------------------------------------------------
% 108.24/14.40 % User time : 13.151 s
% 108.24/14.40 % System time : 0.405 s
% 108.24/14.40 % Total time : 13.556 s
% 108.24/14.40 % Maximum resident set size: 10184 pages
% 108.24/14.40
% 108.24/14.40 % -------------------------------------------------
% 108.24/14.40 % User time : 64.730 s
% 108.24/14.40 % System time : 1.944 s
% 108.24/14.40 % Total time : 66.673 s
% 108.24/14.40 % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 108.24/14.40 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------