%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW268+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:11 PM UTC 2026
% Result : ContradictoryAxioms 9.41s 1.93s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 13
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 48 ( 24 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 89 ( 59 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 76 ( 35 ~; 27 |; 6 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 66 ( 8 sgn 36 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_smult__0__left,axiom,
! [X14,X6] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X6)
=> c_Polynomial_Osmult(X6,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X6),X14) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X6)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_smult__0__left) ).
fof(fact_add__poly__code_I2_J,axiom,
! [X14,X6] :
( class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X6)
=> c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X6),X14,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X6))) = X14 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_add__poly__code_I2_J) ).
fof(fact_synthetic__div__unique,axiom,
! [X65,X13,X21,X14,X6] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X6)
=> ( c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X6),X14,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X6,X21,X13)) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(X6,X65,X13)
=> ( X13 = c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X6,X14,X21)
& X65 = hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X6,X14),X21) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_synthetic__div__unique) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0,axiom,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add,axiom,
class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add) ).
fof(fact__096_B_By_O_Apoly_A_IpCons_Ac_Acs_J_A0_A_061_Apoly_A_IpCons_Ac_Acs_J_Ay_096,axiom,
! [X4] : hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X4),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact__096_B_By_O_Apoly_A_IpCons_Ac_Acs_J_A0_A_061_Apoly_A_IpCons_Ac_Acs_J_Ay_096) ).
fof(fact_smult__0__right,axiom,
! [X20,X6] :
( class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X6)
=> c_Polynomial_Osmult(X6,X20,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X6))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X6)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_smult__0__right) ).
fof(fact_ext,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( ! [X3] : hAPP(X2,X3) = hAPP(X1,X3)
=> X2 = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_ext) ).
fof(fact_poly__eq__iff,axiom,
! [X7,X8,X6] :
( ( class_Rings_Oidom(X6)
& class_Int_Oring__char__0(X6) )
=> ( c_Polynomial_Opoly(X6,X8) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(X6,X7)
<=> X8 = X7 ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_poly__eq__iff) ).
fof(fact_pCons_Oprems,axiom,
~ ? [X12] :
( c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X12,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))
& X12 != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_pCons_Oprems) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Oidom,axiom,
class_Rings_Oidom(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Oidom) ).
fof(arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Int_Oring__char__0,axiom,
class_Int_Oring__char__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Int_Oring__char__0) ).
fof(fact_c0,axiom,
v_c____ != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_c0) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X717,X718] :
( c_Polynomial_Osmult(X718,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X718),X717) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X718))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X718) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_smult__0__left])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1380,X1381] :
( c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1381),X1380,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1381))) = X1380
| ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1381) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_add__poly__code_I2_J])])]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X1521,X1522,X1523,X1524,X1525] :
( ( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1525)
| c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1525),X1524,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1525,X1523,X1522)) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1525,X1521,X1522)
| X1522 = c_Polynomial_Osynthetic__div(X1525,X1524,X1523) )
& ( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1525)
| c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1525),X1524,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1525,X1523,X1522)) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X1525,X1521,X1522)
| X1521 = hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1525,X1524),X1523) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_synthetic__div__unique])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(X1),X2) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(X1)
| c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1),X2,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
class_Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Groups_Ocomm__monoid__add]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X98] : hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X98),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact__096_B_By_O_Apoly_A_IpCons_Ac_Acs_J_A0_A_061_Apoly_A_IpCons_Ac_Acs_J_Ay_096]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X2)
| c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X2),X3,c_Polynomial_Osmult(X2,X4,X5)) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(X2,X1,X5)
| X1 = hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(X2,X3),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
c_Polynomial_Osmult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
c_Groups_Oplus__class_Oplus(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X709,X710] :
( c_Polynomial_Osmult(X710,X709,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X710))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X710))
| ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X710) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_smult__0__right])])]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X95,X96] :
( X96 = X95
| hAPP(X96,esk1_2(X95,X96)) != hAPP(X95,esk1_2(X95,X96)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_ext])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X1,X2)),c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)) = X1,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]),c_0_17])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Ocomm__semiring__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Osmult(X1,X2,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( hAPP(X1,esk1_2(X2,X1)) != hAPP(X2,esk1_2(X2,X1))
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),X1) = v_c____,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
c_Polynomial_Osmult(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))) = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_32,plain,
! [X101,X102,X103] :
( ( ~ class_Rings_Oidom(X103)
| ~ class_Int_Oring__char__0(X103)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(X103,X102) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(X103,X101)
| X102 != X101 )
& ( ~ class_Rings_Oidom(X103)
| ~ class_Int_Oring__char__0(X103)
| X102 = X101
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(X103,X102) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(X103,X101) ) ),
inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_poly__eq__iff])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
( hAPP(X1,esk1_2(X1,c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)))) != v_c____
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)) = X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
hAPP(c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))),X2) = X1,
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_31]),c_0_23]),c_0_17])])]) ).
fof(c_0_35,plain,
~ ? [X12] :
( c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X12,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))
& X12 != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_pCons_Oprems]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
( ~ class_Rings_Oidom(X1)
| ~ class_Int_Oring__char__0(X1)
| c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,X2) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(X1,X3)
| X2 = X3 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))) = c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34])]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
class_Rings_Oidom(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Rings_Oidom]) ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
class_Int_Oring__char__0(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Complex__Ocomplex__Int_Oring__char__0]) ).
fof(c_0_40,plain,
v_c____ != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_c0]) ).
fof(c_0_41,plain,
! [X112] :
( c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X112,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))
| X112 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_35])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
( c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____)) != c_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X1)
| c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))) = X1 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38]),c_0_39])]) ).
fof(c_0_43,plain,
v_c____ != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____) != c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,X1,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex)))
| X1 = c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Polynomial_Opoly(tc_Complex_Ocomplex))) = c_Polynomial_OpCons(tc_Complex_Ocomplex,v_c____,v_cs____),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
v_c____ != c_Groups_Ozero__class_Ozero(tc_Complex_Ocomplex),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_43]) ).
cnf(c_0_47,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SWW268+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:44:40 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 9.41/1.93 % Version: 3.5.1
% 9.41/1.93 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.41/1.93 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1590746 completed with status 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 9.41/1.93 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.41/1.93 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.41/1.93 % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.41/1.93 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 9.41/1.93 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S4d with 113s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI with 113s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with pid 1590770 completed with status 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI
% 9.41/1.93 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 9.41/1.93 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 9.41/1.93 % No SInE strategy applied
% 9.41/1.93 % Search class: FGHSM-SSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 9.41/1.93 % Scheduled 13 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S2mI with 113s (1) cores
% 9.41/1.93 % Preprocessing time : 0.031 s
% 9.41/1.93 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.41/1.93
% 9.41/1.93 % Proof found!
% 9.41/1.93 % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 9.41/1.93 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.41/1.93 % Parsed axioms : 1212
% 9.41/1.93 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Initial clauses : 1605
% 9.41/1.93 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 78
% 9.41/1.93 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1527
% 9.41/1.93 % Processed clauses : 6596
% 9.41/1.93 % ...of these trivial : 106
% 9.41/1.93 % ...subsumed : 3216
% 9.41/1.93 % ...remaining for further processing : 3274
% 9.41/1.93 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 569
% 9.41/1.93 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Backward-subsumed : 29
% 9.41/1.93 % Backward-rewritten : 37
% 9.41/1.93 % Generated clauses : 16535
% 9.41/1.93 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 13100
% 9.41/1.93 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 9.41/1.93 % Paramodulations : 15942
% 9.41/1.93 % Factorizations : 12
% 9.41/1.93 % NegExts : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Equation resolutions : 609
% 9.41/1.93 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Total rewrite steps : 10743
% 9.41/1.93 % ...of those cached : 9403
% 9.41/1.93 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Propositional check models : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 9.41/1.93 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 9.41/1.93 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 9.41/1.93 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 9.41/1.93 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 9.41/1.93 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 9.41/1.93 % Current number of processed clauses : 1837
% 9.41/1.93 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 505
% 9.41/1.93 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 11
% 9.41/1.93 % Negative unit clauses : 153
% 9.41/1.93 % Non-unit-clauses : 1168
% 9.41/1.93 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 9147
% 9.41/1.93 % ...number of literals in the above : 20068
% 9.41/1.93 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Current number of archived clauses : 1297
% 9.41/1.93 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 173056
% 9.41/1.93 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 117337
% 9.41/1.93 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1653
% 9.41/1.93 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1932
% 9.41/1.93 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 2
% 9.41/1.93 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2229
% 9.41/1.93 % BW rewrite match successes : 264
% 9.41/1.93 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Condensation successes : 0
% 9.41/1.93 % Termbank termtop insertions : 422688
% 9.41/1.93 % Search garbage collected termcells : 20778
% 9.41/1.93
% 9.41/1.93 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.41/1.93 % User time : 1.115 s
% 9.41/1.93 % System time : 0.046 s
% 9.41/1.93 % Total time : 1.161 s
% 9.41/1.93 % Maximum resident set size: 10168 pages
% 9.41/1.93
% 9.41/1.93 % -------------------------------------------------
% 9.41/1.93 % User time : 6.207 s
% 9.41/1.93 % System time : 0.260 s
% 9.41/1.93 % Total time : 6.467 s
% 9.41/1.93 % Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
% 9.41/1.93 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------