↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.CAX-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWW330+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:11:58 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : ContradictoryAxioms 87.66s 19.83s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 87.66s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   54 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  22   ~;  15   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   7  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   4 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   59 (   4 sgn  37   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_order__less__not__sym,axiom,
    ! [X30,X31,X28] :
      ( class_Orderings_Opreorder(X28)
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X28),X31),X30))
       => ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X28),X30),X31)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_order__less__not__sym) ).

fof(fact_lessI,axiom,
    ! [X27] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_Nat_Onat),X27),hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X27))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_lessI) ).

fof(arity_Nat__Onat__Orderings_Opreorder,axiom,
    class_Orderings_Opreorder(tc_Nat_Onat),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Nat__Onat__Orderings_Opreorder) ).

fof(fact_finite__nat__set__iff__bounded,axiom,
    ! [X126] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Nat_Onat),X126))
    <=> ? [X138] :
        ! [X3] :
          ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Nat_Onat),X3),X126))
         => hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_Nat_Onat),X3),X138)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_finite__nat__set__iff__bounded) ).

fof(fact_rangeI,axiom,
    ! [X22,X19,X2,X7] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X7),hAPP(X2,X19)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X22,X7,X2),c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(X22,tc_HOL_Obool))))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_rangeI) ).

fof(fact_finite__imageI,axiom,
    ! [X106,X22,X124,X7] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X7),X124))
     => hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X22),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X7,X22,X106),X124))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_finite__imageI) ).

fof(fact_finite__code,axiom,
    ! [X21,X7] :
      ( class_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X7)
     => hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X7),X21)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_finite__code) ).

fof(arity_Product____Type__Ounit__Finite__Set_Ofinite,axiom,
    class_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_Product____Type__Ounit__Finite__Set_Ofinite) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X30,X31,X28] :
      ( class_Orderings_Opreorder(X28)
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X28),X31),X30))
       => ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X28),X30),X31)) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_order__less__not__sym]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X2426,X2427,X2428] :
      ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X2428),X2426),X2427))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X2428),X2427),X2426))
      | ~ class_Orderings_Opreorder(X2428) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X2380] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_Nat_Onat),X2380),hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X2380))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_lessI]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X1),X3),X2))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(X1),X2),X3))
    | ~ class_Orderings_Opreorder(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_Nat_Onat),X1),hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X1))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    class_Orderings_Opreorder(tc_Nat_Onat),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Nat__Onat__Orderings_Opreorder]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X4529,X4531,X4532,X4533] :
      ( ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Nat_Onat),X4532))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_Nat_Onat),esk86_2(X4532,X4533)),X4533)) )
      & ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Nat_Onat),X4532))
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Nat_Onat),esk86_2(X4532,X4533)),X4532)) )
      & ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_Nat_Onat),X4531),esk85_1(X4529)))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Nat_Onat),X4531),X4529))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Nat_Onat),X4529)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_finite__nat__set__iff__bounded])])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X1)),X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Nat_Onat),X2),X1))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Nat_Onat),X1))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless(tc_Nat_Onat),X2),esk85_1(X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X6703,X6704,X6705,X6706] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X6706),hAPP(X6705,X6704)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X6703,X6706,X6705),c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(X6703,tc_HOL_Obool))))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_rangeI]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Nat_Onat),X1))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,esk85_1(X1))),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),hAPP(X2,X3)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X4,X1,X2),c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(X4,tc_HOL_Obool))))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1496,X1497,X1498,X1499] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1497),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X1499,X1497,X1496),X1498)))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1499),X1498)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_finite__imageI])])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1530,X1531] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1531),X1530))
      | ~ class_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1531) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_finite__code])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Nat_Onat),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X1,tc_Nat_Onat,c_Nat_OSuc),c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1),X2))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X3),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X1,X3,X4),X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ class_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1)
    | hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1),X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    class_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Product__Type_Ounit),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_Product____Type__Ounit__Finite__Set_Ofinite]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(X1),c_Orderings_Otop__class_Otop(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    hBOOL(hAPP(c_Finite__Set_Ofinite(tc_Product__Type_Ounit),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    $false,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWW330+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.41  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.41  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.41  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.41  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.41  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.41  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.41  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/5.41  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:48:15 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/5.41  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/5.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 87.66/19.83  % Version: 3.5.1
% 87.66/19.83  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 87.66/19.83  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 706081 completed with status 0
% 87.66/19.83  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 87.66/19.83  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 87.66/19.83  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 87.66/19.83  % No SInE strategy applied
% 87.66/19.83  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 87.66/19.83  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1499 seconds (1499 total)
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 135s (1) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 135s (1) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 135s (1) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 706089 completed with status 0
% 87.66/19.83  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 87.66/19.83  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 87.66/19.83  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 87.66/19.83  % No SInE strategy applied
% 87.66/19.83  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 87.66/19.83  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1499 seconds (1499 total)
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 87.66/19.83  % Preprocessing time       : 0.333 s
% 87.66/19.83  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 87.66/19.83  
% 87.66/19.83  % Proof found!
% 87.66/19.83  % SZS status ContradictoryAxioms
% 87.66/19.83  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 87.66/19.83  % Parsed axioms                        : 5225
% 87.66/19.83  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 87.66/19.83  % Initial clauses                      : 7588
% 87.66/19.83  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 236
% 87.66/19.83  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7352
% 87.66/19.83  % Processed clauses                    : 12093
% 87.66/19.83  % ...of these trivial                  : 312
% 87.66/19.83  % ...subsumed                          : 1851
% 87.66/19.83  % ...remaining for further processing  : 9930
% 87.66/19.83  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 908
% 87.66/19.83  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 87.66/19.83  % Backward-subsumed                    : 41
% 87.66/19.83  % Backward-rewritten                   : 245
% 87.66/19.83  % Generated clauses                    : 107595
% 87.66/19.83  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 100532
% 87.66/19.83  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 87.66/19.83  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 25
% 87.66/19.83  % Paramodulations                      : 106689
% 87.66/19.83  % Factorizations                       : 8
% 87.66/19.83  % NegExts                              : 0
% 87.66/19.83  % Equation resolutions                 : 963
% 87.66/19.83  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 87.66/19.83  % Total rewrite steps                  : 30631
% 87.66/19.83  % ...of those cached                   : 23293
% 87.66/19.83  % Propositional unsat checks           : 2
% 87.66/19.83  %    Propositional check models        : 2
% 87.66/19.83  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 87.66/19.83  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 87.66/19.83  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 87.66/19.83  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 87.66/19.83  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 87.66/19.83  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.150
% 87.66/19.83  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.051
% 87.66/19.83  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 87.66/19.83  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 87.66/19.83  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 87.66/19.83  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3208
% 87.66/19.83  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1039
% 87.66/19.83  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 15
% 87.66/19.83  %    Negative unit clauses             : 176
% 87.66/19.83  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1978
% 87.66/19.83  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 94437
% 87.66/19.83  % ...number of literals in the above   : 272804
% 87.66/19.83  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 87.66/19.83  % Current number of archived clauses   : 6269
% 87.66/19.83  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4516733
% 87.66/19.83  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2194475
% 87.66/19.83  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1281
% 87.66/19.83  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 48629
% 87.66/19.83  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 87.66/19.83  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 37463
% 87.66/19.83  % BW rewrite match successes           : 618
% 87.66/19.83  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 87.66/19.83  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 87.66/19.83  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 3447894
% 87.66/19.83  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 102645
% 87.66/19.83  
% 87.66/19.83  % -------------------------------------------------
% 87.66/19.83  % User time                : 12.999 s
% 87.66/19.83  % System time              : 0.370 s
% 87.66/19.83  % Total time               : 13.369 s
% 87.66/19.83  % Maximum resident set size: 42852 pages
% 87.66/19.83  
% 87.66/19.83  % -------------------------------------------------
% 87.66/19.83  % User time                : 58.415 s
% 87.66/19.83  % System time              : 1.529 s
% 87.66/19.83  % Total time               : 59.944 s
% 87.66/19.83  % Maximum resident set size: 12544 pages
% 87.66/19.83  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------