↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW333+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:35 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.77s 122.94s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.77s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  17 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   6   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   85 (  36 sgn  30   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(help_c__COMBS__1,axiom,
    ! [X154,X4,X6,X8,X169,X22] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X22,X169,X8),X6),X4),X154) = hAPP(hAPP(X6,X154),hAPP(X4,X154)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',help_c__COMBS__1) ).

fof(help_c__COMBB__1,axiom,
    ! [X154,X4,X6,X169,X8,X22] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X22,X8,X169),X6),X4),X154) = hAPP(X6,hAPP(X4,X154)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',help_c__COMBB__1) ).

fof(fact_n__not__Suc__n,axiom,
    ! [X16] : X16 != hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X16),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_n__not__Suc__n) ).

fof(fact_the_Osimps,axiom,
    ! [X35,X17] : hAPP(c_Option_Othe(X17),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X17),X35)) = X35,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_the_Osimps) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X170,X171,X172,X173,X174,X175] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X175,X174,X173),X172),X171),X170) = hAPP(hAPP(X172,X170),hAPP(X171,X170)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBS__1]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X170,X171,X172,X173,X174,X175] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X175,X174,X173),X172),X171),X170) = hAPP(X172,hAPP(X171,X170)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBB__1]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X17] : X17 != hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X17),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_n__not__Suc__n]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),hAPP(X5,X6)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(X4,hAPP(X5,X6)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    X1 != hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),X7)),X8),X9) = hAPP(X7,hAPP(X9,hAPP(X8,X9))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Nat_OSuc)),X7),X8) != hAPP(X8,hAPP(X7,X8)),
    inference(pm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X36,X37] : hAPP(c_Option_Othe(X37),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X37),X36)) = X36,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_the_Osimps]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Nat_OSuc)),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X7,X8,X9),X10),X11)),X12) != hAPP(X12,hAPP(X10,hAPP(X11,X12))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    hAPP(c_Option_Othe(X1),hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1),X2)) = X2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBS(X1,X2,X3),hAPP(c_COMBB(X4,X5,X6),c_Nat_OSuc)),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBB(X7,X8,X9),c_Option_Othe(X10)),c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X10))),X11) != hAPP(X11,X11),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    $false,
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWW333+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 08:42:37 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.10/24.12  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.10/24.13  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.10/24.13  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.10/24.14  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.25/47.14  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.25/47.15  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.25/47.17  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.25/47.17  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.42/70.16  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.42/70.17  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.42/70.18  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.42/70.19  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.57/93.18  eprover: eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminatingCPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.57/93.18  
% 1.57/93.20  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.57/93.21  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.72/116.20  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.72/116.21  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.72/116.22  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.72/116.23  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.77/122.94  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 1.77/122.94  
% 1.77/122.94  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.77/122.94  # OLD status Res
% 1.77/122.94  # Preprocessing time       : 0.906 s
% 1.77/122.94  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_773c90a94152ea2e8c9d3df9c4b1eb6152c40c03 for 23 seconds:
% 1.77/122.94  
% 1.77/122.94  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.77/122.94  # OLD status Res
% 1.77/122.94  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,,100,1.0)
% 1.77/122.94  # Preprocessing time       : 0.169 s
% 1.77/122.94  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_75515770aeb32f68e33e9fbd9dff93f5a2e34f2e for 23 seconds:
% 1.77/122.94  
% 1.77/122.94  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.77/122.94  # OLD status Res
% 1.77/122.94  # Preprocessing time       : 0.937 s
% 1.77/122.94  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_6c565d2524e660970ec2a72c26d577f665a55420 for 23 seconds:
% 1.77/122.94  
% 1.77/122.94  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.77/122.94  # OLD status Res
% 1.77/122.94  # Preprocessing time       : 1.038 s
% 1.77/122.94  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_750456fc664a9e0b97096ad0f5110b1ead7d782b for 23 seconds:
% 1.77/122.94  
% 1.77/122.94  # Failure: Resource limit exceeded (time)
% 1.77/122.94  # OLD status Res
% 1.77/122.94  # Preprocessing time       : 0.742 s
% 1.77/122.94  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_a9abcacdf80c460fdc9fe242616d68da2308faf5 for 23 seconds:
% 1.77/122.94  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.1,,02,500,1.0)
% 1.77/122.94  # Preprocessing time       : 0.177 s
% 1.77/122.94  
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof found!
% 1.77/122.94  # SZS status Theorem
% 1.77/122.94  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof object total steps             : 17
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof object clause steps            : 9
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof object formula steps           : 8
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof object conjectures             : 0
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 0
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 0
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof object generating inferences   : 5
% 1.77/122.94  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 0
% 1.77/122.94  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 1.77/122.94  # Parsed axioms                        : 5209
% 1.77/122.94  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4708
% 1.77/122.94  # Initial clauses                      : 771
% 1.77/122.94  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 42
% 1.77/122.94  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 729
% 1.77/122.94  # Processed clauses                    : 4185
% 1.77/122.94  # ...of these trivial                  : 42
% 1.77/122.94  # ...subsumed                          : 2854
% 1.77/122.94  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1289
% 1.77/122.94  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 75
% 1.77/122.94  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 145168
% 1.77/122.94  # Backward-subsumed                    : 37
% 1.77/122.94  # Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 1.77/122.94  # Generated clauses                    : 253295
% 1.77/122.94  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 251769
% 1.77/122.94  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.77/122.94  # Paramodulations                      : 253070
% 1.77/122.94  # Factorizations                       : 4
% 1.77/122.94  # Equation resolutions                 : 210
% 1.77/122.94  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1214
% 1.77/122.94  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 118
% 1.77/122.94  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 230
% 1.77/122.94  #    Negative unit clauses             : 99
% 1.77/122.94  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 767
% 1.77/122.94  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 98997
% 1.77/122.94  # ...number of literals in the above   : 165549
% 1.77/122.94  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.77/122.94  # Current number of archived clauses   : 53
% 1.77/122.94  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 66220
% 1.77/122.94  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 53636
% 1.77/122.94  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1884
% 1.77/122.94  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7726
% 1.77/122.94  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 4219
% 1.77/122.94  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 24485
% 1.77/122.94  # BW rewrite match successes           : 794
% 1.77/122.94  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.77/122.94  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.77/122.94  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 8136091
% 1.77/122.94  
% 1.77/122.94  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.77/122.94  # User time                : 5.915 s
% 1.77/122.94  # System time              : 0.099 s
% 1.77/122.94  # Total time               : 6.014 s
% 1.77/122.94  # Maximum resident set size: 143016 pages
% 1.77/139.21  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.77/139.23  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.77/139.23  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.77/139.23  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.77/139.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.24  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.77/139.24  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 1.77/139.25  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.26  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.26  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.26  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.26  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.26  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.26  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.27  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.27  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.27  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.27  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.27  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.27  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.27  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.27  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.28  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.28  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.28  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.28  eprover: No such file or directory
% 1.77/139.29  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 1.77/139.29  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------