↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWW334+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 135.70s 25.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 135.70s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   46 (  11 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   29 (  14   ~;  10   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   19 (  19 usr;  10 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   64 (   6 sgn  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(fact_Collect__mem__eq,axiom,
    ! [X20,X8] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X8),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X8,tc_fun(X8,tc_HOL_Obool),tc_HOL_Obool),c_member(X8)),X20)) = X20,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_Collect__mem__eq) ).

fof(fact_Collect__def,axiom,
    ! [X6,X8] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X8),X6) = X6,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_Collect__def) ).

fof(help_c__COMBC__1,axiom,
    ! [X154,X4,X6,X8,X169,X22] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X22,X169,X8),X6),X4),X154) = hAPP(hAPP(X6,X154),X4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',help_c__COMBC__1) ).

fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
    ! [X3] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),X3),v_Procs))
     => c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,v_na,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P(X3)),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X3))),v_Q(X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_3) ).

fof(conj_4,conjecture,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_na),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P(v_x)),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_x)),v_Q(v_x))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_4) ).

fof(fact_Body__triple__valid__Suc,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X8,X7,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X8),X6),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X5))),X4))
    <=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X8,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X7),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X8),X6),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X5)),X4)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_Body__triple__valid__Suc) ).

fof(fact_mem__def,axiom,
    ! [X20,X48,X8] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X8),X48),X20))
    <=> hBOOL(hAPP(X20,X48)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_mem__def) ).

fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),v_x),v_Procs)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X6590,X6591] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X6591),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X6591,tc_fun(X6591,tc_HOL_Obool),tc_HOL_Obool),c_member(X6591)),X6590)) = X6590,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_Collect__mem__eq]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X6579,X6580] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X6580),X6579) = X6579,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_Collect__def]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X17485,X17486,X17487,X17488,X17489,X17490] : hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X17490,X17489,X17488),X17487),X17486),X17485) = hAPP(hAPP(X17487,X17485),X17486),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[help_c__COMBC__1]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X1),hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool),tc_HOL_Obool),c_member(X1)),X2)) = X2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X1),X2) = X2,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    ! [X17523] :
      ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,v_na,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P(X17523)),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X17523))),v_Q(X17523)))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),X17523),v_Procs)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_3])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,X2,X3),X4),X5),X6) = hAPP(hAPP(X4,X6),X5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_COMBC(X1,tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool),tc_HOL_Obool),c_member(X1)),X2) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_na),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P(v_x)),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_x)),v_Q(v_x))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_4]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X325,X326,X327,X328,X329] :
      ( ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X329,X328,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X329),X327),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X326))),X325))
        | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X329,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X328),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X329),X327),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X326)),X325)) )
      & ( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X329,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X328),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X329),X327),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X326)),X325))
        | ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X329,X328,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X329),X327),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X326))),X325)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_Body__triple__valid__Suc])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),X1),v_Procs))
    | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,v_na,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P(X1)),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1))),v_Q(X1))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),X2),X3) = hAPP(X3,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_na),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P(v_x)),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_x)),v_Q(v_x))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X414,X415,X416] :
      ( ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X416),X415),X414))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(X414,X415)) )
      & ( hBOOL(hAPP(X414,X415))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X416),X415),X414)) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_mem__def])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X1,X2,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X1),X3),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X4))),X5))
    | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(X1,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,X2),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(X1),X3),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X4)),X5)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(v_Procs,X1))
    | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,v_na,hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P(X1)),hAPP(c_Option_Othe(tc_Com_Ocom),hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1))),v_Q(X1))) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_na),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P(v_x)),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_x)),v_Q(v_x))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),X2),X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),v_x),v_Procs)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(v_Procs,X1))
    | c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_na),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P(X1)),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)),v_Q(X1))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple__valid(t_a,hAPP(c_Nat_OSuc,v_na),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P(v_x)),hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_x)),v_Q(v_x))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(v_Procs,v_x)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cdclpropres,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28,c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWW334+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.48  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.48  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.48  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.48  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.48  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.49  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.49  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.22/0.49  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:43:27 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.49  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.49  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.57  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.57  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 135.70/25.27  % Version: 3.5.1
% 135.70/25.27  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 135.70/25.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2021391 completed with status 0
% 135.70/25.27  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 135.70/25.27  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 135.70/25.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 135.70/25.27  % No SInE strategy applied
% 135.70/25.27  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 135.70/25.27  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1499 seconds (1499 total)
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 135s (1) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 135s (1) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 135s (1) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2021399 completed with status 0
% 135.70/25.27  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 135.70/25.27  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 135.70/25.27  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 135.70/25.27  % No SInE strategy applied
% 135.70/25.27  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 135.70/25.27  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1499 seconds (1499 total)
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 135.70/25.27  % Preprocessing time       : 0.332 s
% 135.70/25.27  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 135.70/25.27  % SatCheck found unsatisfiable ground set
% 135.70/25.27  
% 135.70/25.27  % Proof found!
% 135.70/25.27  % SZS status Theorem
% 135.70/25.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 135.70/25.27  % Parsed axioms                        : 5209
% 135.70/25.27  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 135.70/25.27  % Initial clauses                      : 7489
% 135.70/25.27  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 249
% 135.70/25.27  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7240
% 135.70/25.27  % Processed clauses                    : 12626
% 135.70/25.27  % ...of these trivial                  : 283
% 135.70/25.27  % ...subsumed                          : 2343
% 135.70/25.27  % ...remaining for further processing  : 10000
% 135.70/25.27  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2696
% 135.70/25.27  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 135.70/25.27  % Backward-subsumed                    : 18
% 135.70/25.27  % Backward-rewritten                   : 408
% 135.70/25.27  % Generated clauses                    : 136374
% 135.70/25.27  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 127133
% 135.70/25.27  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 135.70/25.27  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 23
% 135.70/25.27  % Paramodulations                      : 133657
% 135.70/25.27  % Factorizations                       : 8
% 135.70/25.27  % NegExts                              : 0
% 135.70/25.27  % Equation resolutions                 : 2772
% 135.70/25.27  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 135.70/25.27  % Total rewrite steps                  : 43206
% 135.70/25.27  % ...of those cached                   : 34181
% 135.70/25.27  % Propositional unsat checks           : 3
% 135.70/25.27  %    Propositional check models        : 2
% 135.70/25.27  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 1
% 135.70/25.27  %    Propositional clauses             : 129275
% 135.70/25.27  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 11295
% 135.70/25.27  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 3
% 135.70/25.27  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 135.70/25.27  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.972
% 135.70/25.27  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.103
% 135.70/25.27  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 135.70/25.27  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.822
% 135.70/25.27  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.051
% 135.70/25.27  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3305
% 135.70/25.27  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1005
% 135.70/25.27  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 28
% 135.70/25.27  %    Negative unit clauses             : 326
% 135.70/25.27  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1946
% 135.70/25.27  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 125970
% 135.70/25.27  % ...number of literals in the above   : 372338
% 135.70/25.27  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 135.70/25.27  % Current number of archived clauses   : 6242
% 135.70/25.27  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3935913
% 135.70/25.27  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1879059
% 135.70/25.27  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1113
% 135.70/25.27  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 53671
% 135.70/25.27  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 135.70/25.27  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 42356
% 135.70/25.27  % BW rewrite match successes           : 800
% 135.70/25.27  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 135.70/25.27  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 135.70/25.27  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 6346780
% 135.70/25.27  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 99194
% 135.70/25.27  
% 135.70/25.27  % -------------------------------------------------
% 135.70/25.27  % User time                : 14.449 s
% 135.70/25.27  % System time              : 0.453 s
% 135.70/25.27  % Total time               : 14.902 s
% 135.70/25.27  % Maximum resident set size: 42640 pages
% 135.70/25.27  
% 135.70/25.27  % -------------------------------------------------
% 135.70/25.27  % User time                : 94.740 s
% 135.70/25.27  % System time              : 2.236 s
% 135.70/25.27  % Total time               : 96.976 s
% 135.70/25.27  % Maximum resident set size: 12544 pages
% 135.70/25.27  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------