%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW342+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:10:36 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.96s 2.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 4 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 5 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 1 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_1,conjecture,
! [X14,X15] :
( v_P(X14,X15)
=> ! [X16] :
( c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X15,v_n,X16)
=> v_P(X14,X16) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',conj_1) ).
fof(fact_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J,axiom,
! [X6,X4,X5] :
( c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X5,X4,X6)
=> X6 = X5 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',fact_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X14,X15] :
( v_P(X14,X15)
=> ! [X16] :
( c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X15,v_n,X16)
=> v_P(X14,X16) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_1]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9] :
( ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X9,X8,X7)
| X7 = X9 ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_evaln__elim__cases_I1_J])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
( v_P(esk1_0,esk2_0)
& c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,esk2_0,v_n,esk3_0)
& ~ v_P(esk1_0,esk3_0) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( X1 = X2
| ~ c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,X2,X3,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
c_Natural_Oevaln(c_Com_Ocom_OSKIP,esk2_0,v_n,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ v_P(esk1_0,esk3_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
esk3_0 = esk2_0,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
v_P(esk1_0,esk2_0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : SWW342+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.04/0.15 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Jun 6 10:06:09 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.96/2.15 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.96/2.15 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.96/2.15 # Preprocessing time : 0.239 s
% 0.96/2.15
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof found!
% 0.96/2.15 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.96/2.15 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof object total steps : 11
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof object conjectures : 8
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof object clause conjectures : 5
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof object initial formulas used : 2
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.96/2.15 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.96/2.15 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.96/2.15 # Parsed axioms : 5206
% 0.96/2.15 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 5105
% 0.96/2.15 # Initial clauses : 170
% 0.96/2.15 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 16
% 0.96/2.15 # Initial clauses in saturation : 154
% 0.96/2.15 # Processed clauses : 155
% 0.96/2.15 # ...of these trivial : 5
% 0.96/2.15 # ...subsumed : 42
% 0.96/2.15 # ...remaining for further processing : 108
% 0.96/2.15 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.96/2.15 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.96/2.15 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.96/2.15 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.96/2.15 # Generated clauses : 377
% 0.96/2.15 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 343
% 0.96/2.15 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.96/2.15 # Paramodulations : 369
% 0.96/2.15 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.96/2.15 # Equation resolutions : 8
% 0.96/2.15 # Current number of processed clauses : 102
% 0.96/2.15 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 0.96/2.15 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.96/2.15 # Negative unit clauses : 9
% 0.96/2.15 # Non-unit-clauses : 79
% 0.96/2.15 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 339
% 0.96/2.15 # ...number of literals in the above : 1117
% 0.96/2.15 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.96/2.15 # Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.96/2.15 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 848
% 0.96/2.15 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 777
% 0.96/2.15 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 30
% 0.96/2.15 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 105
% 0.96/2.15 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.96/2.15 # BW rewrite match attempts : 10
% 0.96/2.15 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.96/2.15 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.96/2.15 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.96/2.15 # Termbank termtop insertions : 150027
% 0.96/2.15
% 0.96/2.15 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.96/2.15 # User time : 0.243 s
% 0.96/2.15 # System time : 0.008 s
% 0.96/2.15 # Total time : 0.251 s
% 0.96/2.15 # Maximum resident set size: 13828 pages
% 0.98/24.14 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.98/24.15 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.16 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.17 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.18 Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.18 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.19 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.20 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.98/24.21 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.98/24.21 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.98/24.21 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------