↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWW367+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:23 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 126.46s 21.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 126.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   45 (  21   ~;  16   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   14 (  14 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   2 sgn  28   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_6,conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(t_a),hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn)),v_G)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_6) ).

fof(fact_le__fun__def,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X9,X7] :
      ( class_Orderings_Oord(X7)
     => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X9,X7)),X2),X1))
      <=> ! [X3] : hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X7),hAPP(X2,X3)),hAPP(X1,X3))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_le__fun__def) ).

fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),v_G),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).

fof(arity_HOL__Obool__Orderings_Oord,axiom,
    class_Orderings_Oord(tc_HOL_Obool),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',arity_HOL__Obool__Orderings_Oord) ).

fof(fact_insert__subset,axiom,
    ! [X15,X11,X10,X9] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X9,tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X9),X10),X11)),X15))
    <=> ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X9,tc_HOL_Obool)),X11),X15))
        & hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X9),X10),X15)) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_insert__subset) ).

fof(fact_imageI,axiom,
    ! [X2,X7,X11,X10,X9] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X9),X10),X11))
     => hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X7),hAPP(X2,X10)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X9,X7,X2),X11))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_imageI) ).

fof(conj_4,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),v_pn),v_U)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_4) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(t_a),hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn)),v_G)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_6]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X611,X612,X613,X614,X615] :
      ( ( ~ class_Orderings_Oord(X614)
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X613,X614)),X612),X611))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X614),hAPP(X612,esk4_4(X611,X612,X613,X614))),hAPP(X611,esk4_4(X611,X612,X613,X614)))) )
      & ( ~ class_Orderings_Oord(X614)
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X614),hAPP(X612,X615)),hAPP(X611,X615)))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X613,X614)),X612),X611)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_le__fun__def])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(t_a),hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn)),v_G)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ class_Orderings_Oord(X2)
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X1,X2)),X3),X4))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X2),hAPP(X3,X5)),hAPP(X4,X5))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),v_G),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    class_Orderings_Oord(tc_HOL_Obool),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[arity_HOL__Obool__Orderings_Oord]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(t_a),hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn)),v_G)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X487,X488,X489,X490] :
      ( ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X490,tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X490),X489),X488)),X487))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X490,tc_HOL_Obool)),X488),X487))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X490),X489),X487)) )
      & ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X490,tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X490),X489),X488)),X487))
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X490,tc_HOL_Obool)),X488),X487)) )
      & ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X490,tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X490),X489),X488)),X487))
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X490),X489),X487)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_insert__subset])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ class_Orderings_Oord(X1)
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(X1),hAPP(X2,esk4_4(X3,X2,X4,X1))),hAPP(X3,esk4_4(X3,X2,X4,X1))))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X4,X1)),X2),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_HOL_Obool),hAPP(v_G,X1)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U),X1))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(t_a,tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(t_a),hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn)),v_G)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool)),X4),X3))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),X2),X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1),X2),X4)),X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_Orderings_Oord__class_Oless__eq(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool)),v_G),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_12])]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X424,X425,X426,X427,X428] :
      ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X425),hAPP(X424,X427)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X428,X425,X424),X426)))
      | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X428),X427),X426)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_imageI])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(t_a),hAPP(v_mgt__call,v_pn)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(tc_Com_Opname,t_a,v_mgt__call),v_U))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X1),X2),X3))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(X4),hAPP(X5,X2)),hAPP(c_Set_Oimage(X1,X4,X5),X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(c_member(tc_Com_Opname),v_pn),v_U)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SWW367+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.48  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.48  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.48  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.48  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.48  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.48  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.48  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.19/0.48  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:49:43 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.48  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.48  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.56  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.56  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 126.46/21.49  % Version: 3.5.1
% 126.46/21.49  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 126.46/21.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2555661 completed with status 0
% 126.46/21.49  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 126.46/21.49  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 126.46/21.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 126.46/21.49  % No SInE strategy applied
% 126.46/21.49  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 126.46/21.49  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1498 seconds (1498 total)
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 135s (1) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 135s (1) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 135s (1) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2555669 completed with status 0
% 126.46/21.49  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 126.46/21.49  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 126.46/21.49  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 126.46/21.49  % No SInE strategy applied
% 126.46/21.49  % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 126.46/21.49  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1498 seconds (1498 total)
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 150s (1) cores
% 126.46/21.49  % Preprocessing time       : 0.329 s
% 126.46/21.49  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 126.46/21.49  
% 126.46/21.49  % Proof found!
% 126.46/21.49  % SZS status Theorem
% 126.46/21.49  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 126.46/21.49  % Parsed axioms                        : 5230
% 126.46/21.49  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 126.46/21.49  % Initial clauses                      : 7605
% 126.46/21.49  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 245
% 126.46/21.49  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7360
% 126.46/21.49  % Processed clauses                    : 13104
% 126.46/21.49  % ...of these trivial                  : 346
% 126.46/21.49  % ...subsumed                          : 2149
% 126.46/21.49  % ...remaining for further processing  : 10609
% 126.46/21.49  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1097
% 126.46/21.49  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 126.46/21.49  % Backward-subsumed                    : 63
% 126.46/21.49  % Backward-rewritten                   : 232
% 126.46/21.49  % Generated clauses                    : 180838
% 126.46/21.49  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 170544
% 126.46/21.49  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 126.46/21.49  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 26
% 126.46/21.49  % Paramodulations                      : 179749
% 126.46/21.49  % Factorizations                       : 10
% 126.46/21.49  % NegExts                              : 0
% 126.46/21.49  % Equation resolutions                 : 1145
% 126.46/21.49  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 126.46/21.49  % Total rewrite steps                  : 51419
% 126.46/21.49  % ...of those cached                   : 40247
% 126.46/21.49  % Propositional unsat checks           : 3
% 126.46/21.49  %    Propositional check models        : 2
% 126.46/21.49  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 126.46/21.49  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 126.46/21.49  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 126.46/21.49  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 126.46/21.49  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 126.46/21.49  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.974
% 126.46/21.49  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.589
% 126.46/21.49  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 126.46/21.49  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 126.46/21.49  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 126.46/21.49  % Current number of processed clauses  : 3869
% 126.46/21.49  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1105
% 126.46/21.49  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 29
% 126.46/21.49  %    Negative unit clauses             : 148
% 126.46/21.49  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2587
% 126.46/21.49  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 166246
% 126.46/21.49  % ...number of literals in the above   : 499422
% 126.46/21.49  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 126.46/21.49  % Current number of archived clauses   : 6279
% 126.46/21.49  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4460786
% 126.46/21.49  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1965797
% 126.46/21.49  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1560
% 126.46/21.49  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26653
% 126.46/21.49  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 126.46/21.49  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 38618
% 126.46/21.49  % BW rewrite match successes           : 636
% 126.46/21.49  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 126.46/21.49  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 126.46/21.49  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 6848514
% 126.46/21.49  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 102629
% 126.46/21.49  
% 126.46/21.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 126.46/21.49  % User time                : 18.594 s
% 126.46/21.49  % System time              : 0.559 s
% 126.46/21.49  % Total time               : 19.153 s
% 126.46/21.49  % Maximum resident set size: 42592 pages
% 126.46/21.49  
% 126.46/21.49  % -------------------------------------------------
% 126.46/21.49  % User time                : 84.436 s
% 126.46/21.49  % System time              : 2.225 s
% 126.46/21.49  % Total time               : 86.660 s
% 126.46/21.49  % Maximum resident set size: 12288 pages
% 126.46/21.49  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------