%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW386+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:26 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 21.42s 4.04s
% Output : CNFRefutation 21.42s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 25 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 53 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 39 ( 22 ~; 12 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 10 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 34 ( 3 sgn 19 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_4,conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_4) ).
fof(fact_singleton__conv2,axiom,
! [X6,X5] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X5),hAPP(c_fequal,X6)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X5),X6),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X5,tc_HOL_Obool))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_singleton__conv2) ).
fof(fact_Collect__def,axiom,
! [X27,X5] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X5),X27) = X27,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_Collect__def) ).
fof(fact_MGF,axiom,
! [X7] :
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
=> ( c_Com_OWT__bodies
=> ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X7))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X7)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_MGF) ).
fof(fact_option_Osimps_I2_J,axiom,
! [X41,X5] : c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X5) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X5),X41),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_option_Osimps_I2_J) ).
fof(fact_WT_OBody,axiom,
! [X12] :
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X12) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
=> hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X12))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_WT_OBody) ).
fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).
fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),v_y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_3) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_4]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X11647,X11648] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X11648),hAPP(c_fequal,X11647)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X11648),X11647),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X11648,tc_HOL_Obool))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_singleton__conv2]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X11613,X11614] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X11614),X11613) = X11613,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_Collect__def]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X335] :
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X335)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool))))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X335))
| ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_MGF])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X41,X5] : c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X5) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X5),X41),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_option_Osimps_I2_J]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X12] :
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X12) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
=> hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X12))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_WT_OBody]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X1),hAPP(c_fequal,X2)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1),X2),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X1),X2) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
! [X463,X464] : c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X464) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X464),X463),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_14])]) ).
fof(c_0_23,plain,
! [X435] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X435)))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X435) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1),X2),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool))) = hAPP(c_fequal,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X1) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1),X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(c_fequal,hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(c_fequal,hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X1))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),X2)
| hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),v_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) != hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn)
| hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1))) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : SWW386+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.05/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.05/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.05/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.05/0.31 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.05/0.31 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.05/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.05/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:50:23 UTC 2026
% 0.05/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.05/0.31 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.34 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.34 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 21.42/4.04 % Version: 3.5.1
% 21.42/4.04 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 21.42/4.04 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 2110388 completed with status 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 21.42/4.04 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 21.42/4.04 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 21.42/4.04 % No SInE strategy applied
% 21.42/4.04 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 21.42/4.04 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 151s (1) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 136s (1) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 2110396 completed with status 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 21.42/4.04 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 21.42/4.04 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 21.42/4.04 % No SInE strategy applied
% 21.42/4.04 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 21.42/4.04 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 151s (1) cores
% 21.42/4.04 % Preprocessing time : 0.134 s
% 21.42/4.04 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 21.42/4.04
% 21.42/4.04 % Proof found!
% 21.42/4.04 % SZS status Theorem
% 21.42/4.04 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 21.42/4.04 % Parsed axioms : 5248
% 21.42/4.04 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Initial clauses : 7574
% 21.42/4.04 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 233
% 21.42/4.04 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7341
% 21.42/4.04 % Processed clauses : 9879
% 21.42/4.04 % ...of these trivial : 256
% 21.42/4.04 % ...subsumed : 1545
% 21.42/4.04 % ...remaining for further processing : 8078
% 21.42/4.04 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 598
% 21.42/4.04 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Backward-subsumed : 36
% 21.42/4.04 % Backward-rewritten : 212
% 21.42/4.04 % Generated clauses : 6782
% 21.42/4.04 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5909
% 21.42/4.04 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 28
% 21.42/4.04 % Paramodulations : 6214
% 21.42/4.04 % Factorizations : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % NegExts : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Equation resolutions : 634
% 21.42/4.04 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Total rewrite steps : 8090
% 21.42/4.04 % ...of those cached : 6387
% 21.42/4.04 % Propositional unsat checks : 2
% 21.42/4.04 % Propositional check models : 2
% 21.42/4.04 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 21.42/4.04 % Propositional encoding time : 0.061
% 21.42/4.04 % Propositional solver time : 0.017
% 21.42/4.04 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 21.42/4.04 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 21.42/4.04 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 21.42/4.04 % Current number of processed clauses : 1422
% 21.42/4.04 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 652
% 21.42/4.04 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 21.42/4.04 % Negative unit clauses : 94
% 21.42/4.04 % Non-unit-clauses : 674
% 21.42/4.04 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8560
% 21.42/4.04 % ...number of literals in the above : 20894
% 21.42/4.04 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Current number of archived clauses : 6207
% 21.42/4.04 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4484584
% 21.42/4.04 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1824413
% 21.42/4.04 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1256
% 21.42/4.04 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23772
% 21.42/4.04 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % BW rewrite match attempts : 27290
% 21.42/4.04 % BW rewrite match successes : 496
% 21.42/4.04 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Condensation successes : 0
% 21.42/4.04 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1425072
% 21.42/4.04 % Search garbage collected termcells : 100789
% 21.42/4.04
% 21.42/4.04 % -------------------------------------------------
% 21.42/4.04 % User time : 3.371 s
% 21.42/4.04 % System time : 0.124 s
% 21.42/4.04 % Total time : 3.495 s
% 21.42/4.04 % Maximum resident set size: 42688 pages
% 21.42/4.04
% 21.42/4.04 % -------------------------------------------------
% 21.42/4.04 % User time : 13.620 s
% 21.42/4.04 % System time : 0.521 s
% 21.42/4.04 % Total time : 14.141 s
% 21.42/4.04 % Maximum resident set size: 12288 pages
% 21.42/4.04 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------