%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : SWW387+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:12:05 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 43.20s 8.79s
% Output : CNFRefutation 43.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 26 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 50 ( 18 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 36 ( 21 ~; 10 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 3 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 18 ( 18 usr; 10 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 31 ( 2 sgn 19 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_5,conjecture,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_5) ).
fof(fact_singleton__conv2,axiom,
! [X6,X5] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X5),hAPP(c_fequal,X6)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X5),X6),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X5,tc_HOL_Obool))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_singleton__conv2) ).
fof(fact_Collect__def,axiom,
! [X29,X5] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X5),X29) = X29,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_Collect__def) ).
fof(fact_MGF,axiom,
! [X7] :
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
=> ( c_Com_OWT__bodies
=> ( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X7))
=> c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X7)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_MGF) ).
fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).
fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).
fof(fact_option_Osimps_I2_J,axiom,
! [X92,X5] : c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X5) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X5),X92),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_option_Osimps_I2_J) ).
fof(fact_WT_OBody,axiom,
! [X12] :
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X12) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
=> hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X12))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_WT_OBody) ).
fof(conj_3,hypothesis,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),v_y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_3) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_5]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X3952,X3953] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X3953),hAPP(c_fequal,X3952)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X3953),X3952),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X3953,tc_HOL_Obool))),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_singleton__conv2]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X3628,X3629] : hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X3629),X3628) = X3628,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[fact_Collect__def]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X328] :
( c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X328)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool))))
| ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X328))
| ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_MGF])])]) ).
fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X1),hAPP(c_fequal,X2)) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X1),X2),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X1,tc_HOL_Obool))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
hAPP(c_Set_OCollect(X1),X2) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| ~ c_Com_OWT__bodies
| ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ostate__not__singleton,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
c_Com_OWT__bodies,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X92,X5] : c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X5) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X5),X92),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_option_Osimps_I2_J]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
hAPP(c_fequal,X1) = hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(X2),X1),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(X2,tc_HOL_Obool))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate)),hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X1)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X12] :
( hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X12) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom)
=> hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X12))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_WT_OBody]) ).
fof(c_0_25,plain,
! [X2520,X2521] : c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X2521) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X2521),X2520),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(c_fequal,hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,X1))
| c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(tc_Com_Ostate,c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(tc_Com_Ostate),tc_HOL_Obool)),hAPP(c_fequal,hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_OMGT,X1))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_22]) ).
fof(c_0_28,plain,
! [X2620] :
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X2620)))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X2620) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_24])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
c_Option_Ooption_ONone(X1) != hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(X1),X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn) = hAPP(c_Option_Ooption_OSome(tc_Com_Ocom),v_y),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
~ hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,v_pn))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( hBOOL(hAPP(c_Com_OWT,hAPP(c_Com_Ocom_OBODY,X1)))
| hAPP(c_Com_Obody,X1) = c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,hypothesis,
hAPP(c_Com_Obody,v_pn) != c_Option_Ooption_ONone(tc_Com_Ocom),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : SWW387+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.48 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.48 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.22/0.48 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:50:51 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.49 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.49 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.54 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 43.20/8.79 % Version: 3.5.1
% 43.20/8.79 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 43.20/8.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 2277032 completed with status 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 43.20/8.79 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 43.20/8.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 43.20/8.79 % No SInE strategy applied
% 43.20/8.79 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 43.20/8.79 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1499 seconds (1499 total)
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 150s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 135s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 135s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 135s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 2277043 completed with status 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Result found by G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 43.20/8.79 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSLSMSSSNFFN.
% 43.20/8.79 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 1500s (5) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 43.20/8.79 % No SInE strategy applied
% 43.20/8.79 % Search class: FGHSM-SMLM33-DFFFFFNN
% 43.20/8.79 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1499 seconds (1499 total)
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 135s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 150s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting U----_206e_00_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 135s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting SAT001_CA_MinMin_p005000_rr with 135s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Starting G-E--_208_B07_F1_S5PRR_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 135s (1) cores
% 43.20/8.79 % Preprocessing time : 0.309 s
% 43.20/8.79 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 43.20/8.79
% 43.20/8.79 % Proof found!
% 43.20/8.79 % SZS status Theorem
% 43.20/8.79 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 43.20/8.79 % Parsed axioms : 5249
% 43.20/8.79 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Initial clauses : 7531
% 43.20/8.79 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 231
% 43.20/8.79 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7300
% 43.20/8.79 % Processed clauses : 9538
% 43.20/8.79 % ...of these trivial : 197
% 43.20/8.79 % ...subsumed : 1322
% 43.20/8.79 % ...remaining for further processing : 8019
% 43.20/8.79 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 571
% 43.20/8.79 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Backward-subsumed : 45
% 43.20/8.79 % Backward-rewritten : 441
% 43.20/8.79 % Generated clauses : 4318
% 43.20/8.79 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4082
% 43.20/8.79 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 31
% 43.20/8.79 % Paramodulations : 3780
% 43.20/8.79 % Factorizations : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % NegExts : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Equation resolutions : 605
% 43.20/8.79 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Total rewrite steps : 7962
% 43.20/8.79 % ...of those cached : 5832
% 43.20/8.79 % Propositional unsat checks : 2
% 43.20/8.79 % Propositional check models : 2
% 43.20/8.79 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 43.20/8.79 % Propositional encoding time : 0.110
% 43.20/8.79 % Propositional solver time : 0.042
% 43.20/8.79 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 43.20/8.79 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 43.20/8.79 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 43.20/8.79 % Current number of processed clauses : 1130
% 43.20/8.79 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 545
% 43.20/8.79 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 4
% 43.20/8.79 % Negative unit clauses : 100
% 43.20/8.79 % Non-unit-clauses : 481
% 43.20/8.79 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7274
% 43.20/8.79 % ...number of literals in the above : 17634
% 43.20/8.79 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Current number of archived clauses : 6442
% 43.20/8.79 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3484896
% 43.20/8.79 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1481650
% 43.20/8.79 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1072
% 43.20/8.79 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29226
% 43.20/8.79 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 100504
% 43.20/8.79 % BW rewrite match attempts : 41388
% 43.20/8.79 % BW rewrite match successes : 9265
% 43.20/8.79 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Condensation successes : 0
% 43.20/8.79 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1455639
% 43.20/8.79 % Search garbage collected termcells : 98955
% 43.20/8.79
% 43.20/8.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 43.20/8.79 % User time : 7.558 s
% 43.20/8.79 % System time : 0.238 s
% 43.20/8.79 % Total time : 7.796 s
% 43.20/8.79 % Maximum resident set size: 42884 pages
% 43.20/8.79
% 43.20/8.79 % -------------------------------------------------
% 43.20/8.79 % User time : 28.301 s
% 43.20/8.79 % System time : 0.972 s
% 43.20/8.79 % Total time : 29.273 s
% 43.20/8.79 % Maximum resident set size: 12544 pages
% 43.20/8.79 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------