↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SWW391+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 03:10:26 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.51s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   45 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   45 (  18   ~;  16   |;   5   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;  10 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  11   !;   4   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conj_2,conjecture,
    ! [X28,X29] :
      ( ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,X28),X29))
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X28),X29)) )
     => ? [X308,X309] :
          ( ! [X39] :
              ( ! [X40] :
                  ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X308,X40),X29))
                 => hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X309,X40),X39)) )
             => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q_H,X28),X39))
                | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,X28),X39)) ) )
          & c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),X308),v_c),X309)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_2) ).

fof(conj_0,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),v_c),v_Q)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

fof(conj_1,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P_H),v_c),v_Q_H)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_1) ).

fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X28,X29] :
        ( ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,X28),X29))
          | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X28),X29)) )
       => ? [X308,X309] :
            ( ! [X39] :
                ( ! [X40] :
                    ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X308,X40),X29))
                   => hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X309,X40),X39)) )
               => ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q_H,X28),X39))
                  | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,X28),X39)) ) )
            & c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),X308),v_c),X309)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))) ) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_2]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X312,X313,X315] :
      ( ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),X312),v_c),X313)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q_H,esk1_0),esk3_2(X312,X313))) )
      & ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),X312),v_c),X313)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,esk1_0),esk3_2(X312,X313))) )
      & ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),X312),v_c),X313)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))))
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X313,X315),esk3_2(X312,X313)))
        | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X312,X315),esk2_0)) )
      & ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,esk1_0),esk2_0))
        | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,esk1_0),esk2_0)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),X1),v_c),X2)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,esk1_0),esk3_2(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P),v_c),v_Q)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_0]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),X1),v_c),X3)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X1,X2),esk2_0))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(X3,X2),esk3_2(X1,X3))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,esk1_0),esk3_2(v_P,v_Q))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,X1),esk2_0))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q,X1),esk3_2(v_P,v_Q))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),X1),v_c),X2)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool))))
    | ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q_H,esk1_0),esk3_2(X1,X2))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Ohoare__derivs(t_a,v_G,hAPP(hAPP(c_Set_Oinsert(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a)),hAPP(hAPP(hAPP(c_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple_Otriple(t_a),v_P_H),v_c),v_Q_H)),c_Orderings_Obot__class_Obot(tc_fun(tc_Hoare__Mirabelle_Otriple(t_a),tc_HOL_Obool)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[conj_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,esk1_0),esk2_0))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,esk1_0),esk2_0)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P,esk1_0),esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q_H,esk1_0),esk3_2(v_P_H,v_Q_H))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    ( ~ hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,X1),esk2_0))
    | hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_Q_H,X1),esk3_2(v_P_H,v_Q_H))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    hBOOL(hAPP(hAPP(v_P_H,esk1_0),esk2_0)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SWW391+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 09:50:41 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/1.42  % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.51/1.42  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/1.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.51/1.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.51/1.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.42  % new_bool_3 with pid 1602420 completed with status 0
% 2.51/1.42  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 2.51/1.42  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/1.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.51/1.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.51/1.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.51/1.42  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.51/1.42  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 2.51/1.42  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.51/1.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.42  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1602423 completed with status 0
% 2.51/1.42  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 2.51/1.42  % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.51/1.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.51/1.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.51/1.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 2.51/1.42  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 2.51/1.42  % Search class: FGHSM-FSLM32-DFFFFFNN
% 2.51/1.42  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 2.51/1.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 2.51/1.42  % Preprocessing time       : 0.013 s
% 2.51/1.42  
% 2.51/1.42  % Proof found!
% 2.51/1.42  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.51/1.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.51/1.42  % Parsed axioms                        : 5230
% 2.51/1.42  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 4650
% 2.51/1.42  % Initial clauses                      : 865
% 2.51/1.42  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 38
% 2.51/1.42  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 827
% 2.51/1.42  % Processed clauses                    : 5602
% 2.51/1.42  % ...of these trivial                  : 214
% 2.51/1.42  % ...subsumed                          : 4041
% 2.51/1.42  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1347
% 2.51/1.42  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1422
% 2.51/1.42  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.51/1.42  % Backward-subsumed                    : 40
% 2.51/1.42  % Backward-rewritten                   : 77
% 2.51/1.42  % Generated clauses                    : 55471
% 2.51/1.42  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 46919
% 2.51/1.42  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.51/1.42  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 6
% 2.51/1.42  % Paramodulations                      : 54022
% 2.51/1.42  % Factorizations                       : 10
% 2.51/1.42  % NegExts                              : 0
% 2.51/1.42  % Equation resolutions                 : 1449
% 2.51/1.42  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.51/1.42  % Total rewrite steps                  : 14123
% 2.51/1.42  % ...of those cached                   : 10977
% 2.51/1.42  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.51/1.42  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.51/1.42  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.51/1.42  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.51/1.42  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.51/1.42  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.51/1.42  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.51/1.42  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.51/1.42  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.51/1.42  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.51/1.42  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.51/1.42  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.51/1.42  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1152
% 2.51/1.42  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 324
% 2.51/1.42  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 21
% 2.51/1.42  %    Negative unit clauses             : 123
% 2.51/1.42  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 684
% 2.51/1.42  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40000
% 2.51/1.42  % ...number of literals in the above   : 114522
% 2.51/1.42  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.51/1.42  % Current number of archived clauses   : 118
% 2.51/1.42  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 69554
% 2.51/1.42  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 52647
% 2.51/1.42  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2605
% 2.51/1.42  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4815
% 2.51/1.42  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 257
% 2.51/1.42  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 8286
% 2.51/1.42  % BW rewrite match successes           : 186
% 2.51/1.42  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.51/1.42  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.51/1.42  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1306182
% 2.51/1.42  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 55303
% 2.51/1.42  
% 2.51/1.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.51/1.42  % User time                : 0.660 s
% 2.51/1.42  % System time              : 0.044 s
% 2.51/1.42  % Total time               : 0.705 s
% 2.51/1.42  % Maximum resident set size: 13132 pages
% 2.51/1.42  
% 2.51/1.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.51/1.42  % User time                : 0.919 s
% 2.51/1.42  % System time              : 0.064 s
% 2.51/1.42  % Total time               : 0.983 s
% 2.51/1.42  % Maximum resident set size: 12544 pages
% 2.51/1.42  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------