↑ Up

hopCoP---0.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : hopCoP---0.1
% Problem  : SWW399-1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v5.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 25 05:04:17 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.49s 0.56s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named conclusion_1)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(13,plain,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[conclusion_1]) ).

cnf(l0,plain,
    ~ heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

cnf(7,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(next(X0,X1),sep(lseg(X1,X2),X3)))
    | X0 = X1
    | heap(sep(lseg(X0,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[unfolding_2]) ).

cnf(l1,plain,
    ( ~ heap(sep(next(x1,nil),sep(lseg(nil,nil),emp)))
    | x1 = nil
    | heap(sep(lseg(x1,nil),emp)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

cnf(12,plain,
    heap(sep(next(x1,nil),emp)),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[premise_2]) ).

cnf(l31,plain,
    heap(sep(next(x1,nil),emp)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

cnf(0,plain,
    sep(X0,sep(X1,X2)) = sep(X1,sep(X0,X2)),
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[associative_commutative]) ).

cnf(l9,plain,
    sep(next(x1,nil),sep(lseg(nil,nil),emp)) = sep(lseg(nil,nil),sep(next(x1,nil),emp)),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[0]) ).

cnf(1,plain,
    sep(lseg(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[normalization]) ).

cnf(l34,plain,
    sep(lseg(nil,nil),sep(next(x1,nil),emp)) = sep(next(x1,nil),emp),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    nil != x1,
    inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[premise_1]) ).

cnf(l36,plain,
    nil != x1,
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

cnf(final,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ground_refutation,[status(thm)],[l0,l1,l31,l9,l34,l36]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.07  % Problem  : SWW399-1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v5.2.0.
% 0.02/0.07  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/execute.py 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.25  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.25  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.25  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.25  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.25  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.25  % DateTime : Tue Jul 22 13:36:49 EDT 2025
% 0.07/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 1
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 3
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 4
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 5
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 2
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 6
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 7
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 8
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 9
% 0.07/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 10
% 0.10/0.26  % launching worker at depth: 11
% 0.10/0.31  % launching worker at depth: 12
% 2.49/0.56  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 2.49/0.56  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------